Drainage of the right liver under EUS guidance: A bridge technique allowing drainage of the right liver through the left liver into the stomach or jejunum.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: EUS-guided biliary drainage is now comparable to percutaneous drainage. This technique can be used in cases of complex drainage of the hilum, mainly for salvage therapy to drain the left liver. In cases of inaccessible papilla or altered anatomy, EUS-guided biliary drainage for hilar stenosis of the liver could be used as the first approach. However, this technique has limited applicability for the right liver. In this feasibility study, we reported drainage of the right liver using the bridge technique and hepaticogastrostomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was based on a prospective registry from January 2013 to February 2017. Patients with inaccessible papilla due to altered anatomy or duodenal invasion and drainage under EUS guidance and bridge technique without previous biliary drainage were included in the study. The bridge technique was used to place an uncovered biliary stent between the right and left liver. The left liver was drained with a hepaticogastrostomy. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in the study. Stenosis was Type II for nine, IIIA for two, and Type IV for one patient. Technical and clinical success was 100% and 83%, respectively. Morbidity was 33% (four patients), including three with abdominal pain managed conservatively and one with a percutaneous salvage drainage. Postoperative mortality was 8% (uncontrolled sepsis). The mean survival was 6 months. Chemotherapy could be administered in 70% (seven) patients in cases of clinical success. CONCLUSION: The bridge technique under EUS guidance could be a first alternative for draining malignant hilar stenosis in cases of the inaccessible papilla.

Precut papillotomy: a risky technique not only for experts but also for average endoscopists skilled in ERCP.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the success and complication rates of early precut papillotomy in difficult biliary cannulations performed by an average endoscopist skilled in ERCP. METHODS: We studied 146 consecutive ERCPs during a 27-month period. Precutting was instituted if cannulation failed after 10-15 min. Standard papillotomy was performed in the rest. The analysis was divided into initial period (1st year) and subsequent period (following 15 months). RESULTS: The success rate of cannulation was 95% (139/146). Standard papillotomy was performed in 103/146 (71%) patients. In the remainder, cannulation was successful after precutting in 36/43 (84%) patients. The complication rate was 10% (8/103 in the standard vs. 7/43 in the precut group, P = 0.14). All complications of the standard group were mild. In the precut group, there were three moderate to severe complications. There were no differences between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: Precut papillotomy can be an effective and relatively safe procedure when performed by an average endoscopist skilled in ERCP. Although the complication rate of precutting tended to be higher than standard papilotomy, this was reasonable since it increased the success of selective biliary cannulation in 25% of cases. Complication rates did not improve with experience.