Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Angle Orthod ; 87(3): 466-472, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27824255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of diameter and orthodontic loading of a screw-type implantable device on bone remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screw-shaped devices of four distinct diameters, 1.6, 2, 3, and 3.75 mm, were placed into edentulous sites in five skeletally mature beagle dogs (n = 14/dog) following premolar extraction. Using a split-mouth design, devices on one side were loaded using calibrated 2N coil springs. Epifluorescent bone labels were administered intravenous prior to sacrifice. Bone-implant sections (∼ 70 µm) were evaluated to quantify bone formation rate (BFR), and other histomorphometric variables were assessed in the implant supporting bone. RESULTS: The mean BFR ranged from 10.93 percent per year to 38.91 percent per year. BFR in the bone adjacent to the device was lower for the loaded 1.6-mm screws when compared with the nonloaded 1.6-mm screws (P < .01) and the loaded 2.0-, 3.0-, and 3.75-mm diameter screws (P < .01). No significant differences in BFR were noted, regardless of loading condition, between the 2.0-, 3.0-, and 3.75-mm diameter screws. CONCLUSIONS: We detected a dramatic reduction in bone remodeling. Although orthodontic loading of 2N did not alter bone remodeling associated with screws with a 2.0-mm diameter or larger, it did decrease bone remodeling adjacent to a loaded 1.6-mm screw. The long-term effect of this diminished remodeling should be further investigated.


Subject(s)
Bone Remodeling/physiology , Bone Screws , Dental Stress Analysis , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Animals , Dogs , Male , Models, Animal , Surface Properties , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...