Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Journal of Stroke ; : 401-410, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-900659

ABSTRACT

Background@#and Purpose In real-world practice, the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is uncertain in stroke patients with very favorable or poor prognostic profiles at baseline. We studied the effectiveness of MT versus medical treatment stratifying by different baseline prognostic factors. Methods Retrospective analysis of 2,588 patients with an ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion nested in the population-based registry of stroke code activations in Catalonia from January 2017 to June 2019. The effect of MT on good functional outcome (modified Rankin Score ≤2) and survival at 3 months was studied using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis in three pre-defined baseline prognostic groups: poor (if pre-stroke disability, age >85 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] >25, time from onset >6 hours, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 3), good (if NIHSS <6 or distal occlusion, in the absence of poor prognostic factors), or reference (not meeting other groups’ criteria). @*Results@# Patients receiving MT (n=1,996, 77%) were younger, had less pre-stroke disability, and received systemic thrombolysis less frequently. These differences were balanced after the IPTW stratified by prognosis. MT was associated with good functional outcome in the reference (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 4.4), and especially in the poor baseline prognostic stratum (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.6 to 5.9), but not in the good prognostic stratum. MT was associated with survival only in the poor prognostic stratum (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.3). @*Conclusions@# Despite their worse overall outcomes, the impact of thrombectomy over medical management was more substantial in patients with poorer baseline prognostic factors than patients with good prognostic factors.

2.
Journal of Stroke ; : 401-410, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-892955

ABSTRACT

Background@#and Purpose In real-world practice, the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is uncertain in stroke patients with very favorable or poor prognostic profiles at baseline. We studied the effectiveness of MT versus medical treatment stratifying by different baseline prognostic factors. Methods Retrospective analysis of 2,588 patients with an ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion nested in the population-based registry of stroke code activations in Catalonia from January 2017 to June 2019. The effect of MT on good functional outcome (modified Rankin Score ≤2) and survival at 3 months was studied using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis in three pre-defined baseline prognostic groups: poor (if pre-stroke disability, age >85 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] >25, time from onset >6 hours, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 3), good (if NIHSS <6 or distal occlusion, in the absence of poor prognostic factors), or reference (not meeting other groups’ criteria). @*Results@# Patients receiving MT (n=1,996, 77%) were younger, had less pre-stroke disability, and received systemic thrombolysis less frequently. These differences were balanced after the IPTW stratified by prognosis. MT was associated with good functional outcome in the reference (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 4.4), and especially in the poor baseline prognostic stratum (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.6 to 5.9), but not in the good prognostic stratum. MT was associated with survival only in the poor prognostic stratum (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.3). @*Conclusions@# Despite their worse overall outcomes, the impact of thrombectomy over medical management was more substantial in patients with poorer baseline prognostic factors than patients with good prognostic factors.

3.
Shima Shahjouei; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Ghasem Farahmand; Eric Koza; Ashkhan Mowla; Alireza Vafaei Sadr; Arash Kia; Alaleh Vaghefi Far; Stefania Mondello; Achille Cernigliaro; Annemarei Ranta; Martin Punter; Faezeh Khodadadi; Mrina Sabra; Mahtab Ramezani; Soheil Naderi; Oluwaseyi Olulana; Durgesh Chaudhary; Aicha Lyoubi; Bruce Campbell; Juan F Arenillas; Daniel Bock; Joan Montaner; Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh Neshin; Diana Aguiar de Sousa; Mattew Tenser; Ana Aires; Mercedes De Lera Alfonso; Orkhan Alizada; Elsa Azevedo; Nitin Goyal; Zabihollah Babaeepour; Gelareh Banihashemi; Leo H Bonati; Carlo Cereda; Jason J Chang; Miljenko Crnjakovic; GianMarco De Marchis; Massimo del Sette; Seyed Amir Ebrahimadeh; Mehdi Farhoudi; Ilaria Gandoglia; Bruno Goncalves; Christoph Griessenauer; Mehmet Murat Hanci; Aristeidis H. Katsanos; Christos Krogias; Ronen Leker; Lev Lotman; Jeffrey Mai; Shailesh Male; konark Malhotra; Branko Malojcic; Tresa Mesquita; Asadollah Mirghasemi; Hany Mohamed Aref; Zeinab Mohseni Afshar; Junsun Moon; Mika Niemela; Behnam Rezai Jahromi; Lawrence Nolan; Abhi Pandhi; Jong-Ho Park; Joao Pedro Marto; Francisco Purroy; Sakineh Ranji-Burachaloo; Nuno Reis Carreira; Manuel Requena; Marta Rubiera; Seyed Aidin Sajedi; Joao SargentoFreitas; Vijay Sharma; Thorsten Steiner; Kristi Tempro; Guillaume Turc; Yassaman Ahmadzadeh; Mostafa Almasi-Dooghaee; Farhad Assarzadegan; Arefeh Babazadeh; Humain Baharvahdat; Fabricio Cardoso; Apoorva Dev; Mohammad Ghorbani; Ava Hamidi; Zeynab Sadat Hasheminejad; Sahar Hojjat-Anasri Komachali; Fariborz Khorvash; Firas Kobeissy; Hamidreza Mirkarimi; Elahe Mohammadi-Vosough; Debdipto Misra; Alierza Noorian; Peyman Nowrouzi-Sohrabi; Sepideh Paybast; Leila Poorsaadat; mehrdad Roozbeh; Behnam Sabayan; Saeideh Salehizadeh; Alia Saberi; Mercedeh Sepehrnia; Fahimeh Vahabizad; Thomas Yasuda; Ahmadreza Hojati Marvasti; Mojdeh Ghabaee; Nasrin Rahimian; Mohammad Hosein Harirchian; Afshin Borhani-Haghighi; Rohan Arora; Saeed Ansari; Venkatesh Avula; Jian Li; Vida Abedi; Ramin Zand.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20169169

ABSTRACT

BackgroundStroke is reported as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, there is a lack of regarding comprehensive stroke phenotype and characteristics MethodsWe conducted a multinational observational study on features of consecutive acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and cerebral venous or sinus thrombosis (CVST) among SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. We further investigated the association of demographics, clinical data, geographical regions, and countries health expenditure among AIS patients with the risk of large vessel occlusion (LVO), stroke severity as measured by National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), and stroke subtype as measured by the TOAST criteria. Additionally, we applied unsupervised machine learning algorithms to uncover possible similarities among stroke patients. ResultsAmong the 136 tertiary centers of 32 countries who participated in this study, 71 centers from 17 countries had at least one eligible stroke patient. Out of 432 patients included, 323(74.8%) had AIS, 91(21.1%) ICH, and 18(4.2%) CVST. Among 23 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 16(69.5%) had no evidence of aneurysm. A total of 183(42.4%) patients were women, 104(24.1%) patients were younger than 55 years, and 105(24.4%) patients had no identifiable vascular risk factors. Among 380 patients who had known interval onset of the SARS-CoV-2 and stroke, 144(37.8%) presented to the hospital with chief complaints of stroke-related symptoms, with asymptomatic or undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among AIS patients 44.5% had LVO; 10% had small artery occlusion according to the TOAST criteria. We observed a lower median NIHSS (8[3-17], versus 11 [5-17]; p=0.02) and higher rate of mechanical thrombectomy (12.4% versus 2%; p<0.001) in countries with middle to high-health expenditure when compared to countries with lower health expenditure. The unsupervised machine learning identified 4 subgroups, with a relatively large group with no or limited comorbidities. ConclusionsWe observed a relatively high number of young, and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections among stroke patients. Traditional vascular risk factors were absent among a relatively large cohort of patients. Among hospitalized patients, the stroke severity was lower and rate of mechanical thrombectomy was higher among countries with middle to high-health expenditure.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...