Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 46: 101147, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36860590

ABSTRACT

Objective: Compare the perioperative outcomes and disease-free survival between minimally invasive and open surgery in women with stage I-II high-risk endometrial cancer. Methods: A retrospective, cohort study was performed involving twenty-four centers from Argentina. Patients with grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 2010-2018 were included. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival. Results: Of 343 eligible patients, 214 (62 %) underwent open surgery and 129 (38 %) underwent laparoscopic surgery. No significant differences were seen between the two groups with respect to greater or equal grade III Clavien-Dindo postoperative complications (11 % in the open surgery group vs 9 % minimally invasive surgery group; P = 0.34) Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival at four years (79.14 % [95 % CI 69.42- 86.08] vs 78.80 % [95 % CI 70.61-84.96]), (p = 0.25), even after creating a Cox proportional model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08 95 % CI 0.63-1.84); (p = 0.76). Conclusion: There was no difference between postoperative complications nor oncologic outcomes comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

2.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 17(4): 378-84, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23609587

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report on a series of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent an abdominal radical trachelectomy to preserve their fertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent an abdominal radical trachelectomy in 2 centers of gynecologic oncology in Argentina. Data collected included patient's age, stage, histologic subtype, tumor grade, tumor size, evidence of lymph vascular space invasion, number of lymph nodes removed, perioperative complications, as well as oncologic and obstetrical outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty patients were selected for radical trachelectomy. Five of these patients were excluded from the study: 3 for compromised margins, 1 for lymph node involvement, and 1 for vesicovaginal space involvement. Twenty-five patients underwent the procedure and were included in this report. Median age was 31 years (range = 22-40 years). Nineteen patients had stage IB1, and 6 patients had stage IA2 cervical cancer. Median tumor size was 1.2 cm (range = 0.4-3.5 cm). Median number of pelvic lymph nodes removed was 21 (range = 11-33). Median surgical time was 240 minutes (range = 210-270 minutes), and median length of hospital stay was 3.5 days (range = 3-5 days). Estimated blood loss was 350 mL (range = 200-700 mL). No intraoperative complications were reported. There were 6 postoperative complications. Three patients (12%) were able to get pregnant spontaneously with 3 live births by cesarean delivery. No recurrences were reported with a median follow-up of 29.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is a feasible procedure and a viable option for women wishing to preserve their fertility in developing countries.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/surgery , Fertility Preservation , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Pelvis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Argentina , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL