Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 120(8): 1254-1259, 2017 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28838603

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease remains the most common cause of mortality. We studied the change in outcomes for anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 1995 and 2014. Over the past 20 years, 1,658 patients presenting to our center with anterior STEMI underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 12 hours of presentation. We divided these into 4 quartiles, 1995 to 1999 (n = 312), 2000 to 2004 (n = 408), 2005 to 2009 (n = 428), and 2010 to 2014 (n = 510). Across the 4 quartiles, mean age decreased (64.4, 62, 60.3, and 60 years, p <0.01). In all groups, there was a significant rise in prevalence of smoking, hypertension, and obesity. The median length of hospital stay decreased (6, 4.4, 4.2, and 3.6 days, p <0.01), as did the median door-to-balloon time (DBT) (217, 194, 135, and 38 minutes, p <0.01). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality improved over time (14.4%, 11.8%, 8.4%, and 7.8%; and 20.5%, 16.4%, 15.9%, and 13.9%) (p = 0.01 both). Also, 3-year mortality improved (25.3%, 21.6%, 21.3%, and 16.5%, p = 0.02). After adjusting for age, gender, co-morbidities, ejection fraction, clinical shock, and mitral regurgitation, shorter DBT was associated with lower long-term mortality (compared with DBT <60 minutes; 60 to 90 minutes hazard ratio [HR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 3.00, p = 0.084; 90 to 120 minutes, HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.95, p = 0.04; >120 minutes, HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.96, p = 0.004). In conclusion, over the past 2 decades, long-term outcomes improved in patients presenting with anterior STEMI associated with shortening of DBT.


Subject(s)
Forecasting , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time-to-Treatment/trends , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ohio/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Survival Rate/trends
2.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 47(5): 805-13, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25801015

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess the variation over time in thermal comfort indices and the behavior of physiological parameters related to thermolysis, blood parameters, and semen in natura of buffalo bulls reared in tropical climate. The study was carried out in an artificial insemination station under a humid tropical climate (Afi according to Köppen). Ten water buffalo bulls (Bubalus bubalis) were used during the 5 months (April to August) of study. The environmental Temperature Humidity Index (THId) and the pen microclimate Temperature Humidity Index (THIp) were calculated. Every 25 days, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), rectal temperature (RT), and Benezra's thermal comfort index (BTCI) were assessed in the morning and in the afternoon. A blood assay was performed every month, while semen was collected weekly. THIp did not vary over the months (P > 0.05) and was higher in the afternoon than in the morning (77.7 ± 2.6 versus 81.8 ± 2.1, P < 0.05). RR, HR, and BTCI significantly increased over the months and were different between the periods of the day (P > 0.05) but within the physiological limits. RT varied between the periods of the day and decreased over the months, being the lowest in August (37.8 ± 0.7 °C), time-impacted hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, hemoglobin levels, and spermatic gross motility and vigor (P < 0.05). Thus, buffalo bulls reared under a humid tropical climate may have variations in thermal comfort during the hotter periods but are able to efficiently activate thermoregulatory mechanisms and maintain homeothermy, hence preserving their physiological and seminal parameters at normal levels.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Buffaloes/physiology , Insemination, Artificial , Semen/physiology , Animals , Body Temperature , Brazil , Buffaloes/blood , Male , Semen Preservation , Tropical Climate
4.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 62(5): 409-15, 2013 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23665371

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to ascertain causes of death and the incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related mortality within 30 days. BACKGROUND: Public reporting of 30-day mortality after PCI without clearly identifying the cause may result in operator risk avoidance and affect hospital reputation and reimbursements. Death certificates, utilized by previous reports, have poor correlation with actual cause of death and may be inadequate for public reporting. METHODS: All patients who died within 30 days of a PCI from January 2009 to April 2011 at a tertiary care center were included. Causes of death were identified through detailed chart review using Academic Research Consortium consensus guidelines and compared with reported death certificates. The causes of death were divided into cardiac and noncardiac and PCI and non-PCI-related categories. RESULTS: Of the 4,078 PCI, 81 deaths (2%) occurred within 30 days. Of these, 58% died of cardiac and 42% of noncardiac causes. However, only 42% of 30-day deaths were attributed to PCI-related complications. Patients with non-PCI-related, compared with PCI-related, death presented with a higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (15 of 47 [32%] vs. 2 of 34 [6%]; p < 0.01) and cardiac arrest (19 of 47 [40%] vs. 1 of 34 [3%]; p < 0.01). Death certificates had only 58% accuracy (95% confidence interval: 45% to 72%) for classifying patients as experiencing cardiac versus noncardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: Less than one-half of 30-day deaths are attributed to a PCI-related complication. Death certificates are inaccurate and do not report PCI-related deaths, which may represent a better marker of PCI quality.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Brain Death , Brain Injuries/mortality , Coronary Vessels/injuries , Death Certificates , Heart Arrest/mortality , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Renal Insufficiency/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Stents/adverse effects , Stroke/mortality , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/mortality , Time Factors , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 81(1): E1-8, 2013 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22508442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its impact on mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: It's unclear whether PCI provides benefit in patients with CAD outside of acute settings. We sought to determine the role of PCI and its effect on mortality in patients with similar entry criteria to prior RCTs and compare outcomes with medical treatment. METHODS: Using institutional diagnostic catheterization database of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography from 1/2004 to 1/2010, we examined records for patients with a positive stress test and >70% coronary stenosis or symptoms of angina and >80% coronary stenosis. We excluded those with acute coronary syndromes, low ejection fraction (EF), history of CABG, and CABG following index catheterization. We stratified patients by treatment and performed unadjusted and propensity matched analyses. The outcome was all-cause mortality obtained from the social security death index. RESULTS: We identified 3,375 patients using study inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65 ± 11 years and 69% (n = 2,332) were men. Mean EF was 55% ± 8%. In the unadjusted cohort, 1,265 patients received medical management and 2,110 received PCI. The unadjusted analysis revealed significantly better survival in PCI patients (P < 0.0001) (HR: 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-0.63). Propensity matching was performed for 1,580 patients and analysis showed better survival among patients receiving PCI (0 = 0.04) (HR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98). PCI continued to show better survival after excluding patients with malignancy (P = 0.03) and unstable angina (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This single center registry analysis demonstrated better survival in stable CAD patients undergoing PCI compared to medical management alone. These data suggest there may be a benefit of PCI beyond symptom relief. Future randomized trials are needed to further understand the role of PCI in broader patient populations.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Stents , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 108(1): 15-20, 2011 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21529732

ABSTRACT

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as an appealing alternative to bypass surgery for significant LMCA disease, especially in high-risk candidates. PCI for unprotected LMCA stenosis is currently designated a class IIb indication. Direct comparisons between unprotected LMCA PCI and multivessel PCI are lacking. We aimed to determine the incremental risk associated with unprotected LMCA PCI compared to multivessel PCI. We queried the Cleveland Clinic PCI database to identify patients who underwent unprotected LMCA PCI from 2003 through 2009 and compared these to patients undergoing multivessel PCI in the same period. Patients undergoing PCI for acute myocardial infarction were excluded. Mortality was derived using the Social Security Death Index. Short-term (≤30-day) mortality rates in the LMCA PCI group (n = 468, 1.9%) were similar to the death rate in the multivessel PCI group (n = 1,973, 1.3%, p = 0.3). There was no significant difference in adjusted mortality between the 2 study groups. Stratifying LMCA PCI by the number of concomitant vessel territories treated, there was no significant difference in mortality in any LMCA PCI category (LMCA only, LMCA + 1-vessel PCI, LMCA + multivessel PCI) compared to multivessel PCI. In conclusion, there was comparable short-term and long-term mortality in the LMCA PCI and multivessel PCI groups. LMCA stenting did not appear to incur incremental risk compared to multivessel PCI.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Stenosis/surgery , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Drug-Eluting Stents , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Coronary Stenosis/mortality , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Ohio/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 63(2): 135-40, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15390245

ABSTRACT

The high cost of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has made identification of patients who are at low risk for subsequent revascularization after treatment with bare metal stents (BMSs) highly desirable. Previous reports from randomized trials suffer from biases induced by restricted entry criteria and protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up. Between 1994 and 2001, 5,239 consecutive BMS patients, excluding those with coil stents, technical failure, brachytherapy, staged procedure, or stent thrombosis within 30 days, were prospectively identified from a large single-center tertiary-referral-center prospective registry for long-term follow-up. We sought to identify characteristics of patients with very low (< or = 4%) or low (4-10%) likelihood of coronary revascularization 9 months after BMS. Nine-month clinical follow-up was obtained in 98.2% of patients. Coronary revascularization was required in 13.4% and did not differ significantly by stent type. On the basis of multivariate analysis identifying 11 independent correlates and previous reports, 20 potential low-risk patient and lesion groups (228 +/- 356 patients/groups) were identified (e.g, patients with all of the following: native vessel, de novo, reference diameter > or = 3.5 mm, lesion length < 5 mm, no diabetes, not ostial in location). Actual and model-based outcomes were analyzed. No group had both predicted and observed 9-month revascularization < or = 4% (very low risk). Conversely, 19 of 20 groups had a predicted and observed revascularization rate of 4-10% (low risk). In the real-world setting, the need for intermediate-term revascularization after BMS may be lower than expected, but it may be very difficult to identify patients at very low risk. Conversely, if the benefits of DESs are attenuated in routine practice, many groups of patients treated with BMSs may have nearly comparable results.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Restenosis/epidemiology , Stents , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Metals , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
9.
Am J Cardiol ; 93(11): 1389-90, A6, 2004 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15165920

ABSTRACT

To assess the potential risk of long-term steroid use in the setting of coronary angioplasty, 114 patients of 12,883 consecutively treated patients who were on long-term steroids were compared with those not taking steroids. Steroid use was not associated with increased risk of composite major ischemia events but was associated with a threefold risk (p = 0.01) of major vascular complications and a three- to fourfold risk (p = 0.026) of coronary perforation.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Coronary Vessels/injuries , Databases, Factual , Female , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prednisone/adverse effects , Risk , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Am J Cardiol ; 92(5): 582-3, 2003 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12943879

ABSTRACT

The association between peripheral vascular disease and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention was examined in the Do Tirofiban and Reopro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET). After adjustments in a multivariate model, a history of peripheral vascular disease was found to be associated with a two- to threefold increase in mortality at 1 year after coronary stent placement.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Disease/therapy , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/complications , Aged , Comorbidity , Coronary Disease/complications , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stents , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
11.
Am J Cardiol ; 91(6): 742-3, 2003 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12633814
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 89(8): 937-40, 2002 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11950431

ABSTRACT

Restenosis after stenting, in contrast to balloon angioplasty, is predominantly due to neointima formation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors diminish neointima formation in animal models of arterial injury. In an observational study, 1,598 patients who were treated from 1994 to 1997 with coronary stents and prospectively followed for clinical events were divided into 2 groups: those receiving ACE inhibitors at the time of stenting (n = 345) and those who did not (n = 1,253). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for imbalances between populations with regard to elements relevant to risk of 12-month coronary revascularization, which was the primary study end point. After adjustment, ACE inhibitor usage remained significantly protective against revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.73, p = 0.001). Protection was not observed in patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone during the same period (OR 1.06, p = 0.33), which is consistent with the results of prior randomized trials. ACE inhibitors appear to decrease late revascularization, possibly due to a reduction in restenosis after coronary stenting.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization , Stents , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...