Oxygenation With a Single Portable Pulse-Dose Oxygen-Conserving Device and Combined Stationary and Portable Oxygen Delivery Devices in Subjects With COPD.

BACKGROUND: Portable oxygen devices simplify and facilitate patient therapy. This study was designed to compare S(pO2) and patient satisfaction with a portable oxygen concentrator or a combined system consisting of a fixed device with continuous-flow oxygen dispensation and a portable device with pulse dispensation for ambulation. METHODS: This crossover trial assessed 25 subjects with COPD (92% men, mean age of 72.2 ± 7.4 y, mean FEV1 of 34.14 ± 12.51% of predicted) at 4 hospitals in Madrid. All subjects had previously used the combined system, consisting of a fixed oxygenation system and a portable system for ambulation, with 16 (64%) using stationary and portable concentrators and 9 (36%) using a stationary reservoir and portable liquid oxygen bag. Oxygenation settings at rest and while walking were determined at baseline. Subjects were maintained on the previous combined system for 1 week and then switched to the portable oxygen concentrator for 1 week. Mean S(pO2) over 24 h was calculated using the software in the oximeter, and compliance was monitored (Visionox). RESULTS: Low S(pO2) (< 90%) was significantly more frequent during use of the portable concentrator alone than with the combined system (37.1% vs 18.4%, P < .05). The portable system alone was preferred by 43% of subjects, and the combined system was preferred by 36%, whereas 21% were not sure. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects preferred using a single portable oxygenation system both at home and during ambulation. Portable systems alone, however, did not supply the same levels of oxygenation as the combination of fixed and portable systems. Before the widespread adoption of portable systems as a single device, additional studies are needed to determine best-practice protocols for adjustment of daytime and nighttime oxygenation settings. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02079753).

Monitoring breathing rate at home allows early identification of COPD exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory frequency increases during exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD). We hypothesized that this increase can be detected at home before ECOPD hospitalization. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, respiratory frequency was monitored at home daily for 3 months in 89 patients with COPD (FEV1, 42.3% ± 14.0%; reference) who were receiving domiciliary oxygen therapy (9.6 ± 4.0 h/d). RESULTS: During follow-up, 30 patients (33.7%) required hospitalization because of ECOPD. In 21 of them (70%), mean respiratory frequency increased (vs baseline) during the 5 days that preceded it (from 15.2 ± 4.3/min to 19.1 ± 5.9/min, P < .05). This was not the case in patients without ECOPD (16.1 ± 4.8/min vs 15.9 ± 4.9/min). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that 24 h before hospitalization, a mean increase of 4.4/min (30% from baseline) provided the best combination of sensitivity (66%) and specificity (93%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.79, P < .05). Two days before hospitalization, a mean increase of 2.3/min (15% change from baseline) was associated with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 77% (AUC = 0.76, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory frequency can be monitored daily at home in patients with COPD receiving domiciliary oxygen therapy. In these patients, breathing rate increases significantly days before they require hospitalization because of ECOPD. This may offer a window of opportunity for early intervention.