Defective formation of IgA memory B cells, Th1 and Th17 cells in symptomatic patients with selective IgA deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Selective IgA deficiency (sIgAD) is the most common primary immunodeficiency in Western countries. Patients can suffer from recurrent infections and autoimmune diseases because of a largely unknown aetiology. To increase insights into the pathophysiology of the disease, we studied memory B and T cells and cytokine concentrations in peripheral blood. METHODS: We analysed 30 sIgAD patients (12 children, 18 adults) through detailed phenotyping of peripheral B-cell, CD8+ T-cell and CD4+ T-cell subsets, sequence analysis of IGA and IGG transcripts, in vitro B-cell activation and blood cytokine measurements. RESULTS: All patients had significantly decreased numbers of T-cell-dependent (TD; CD27+) and T-cell-independent (TI; CD27-) IgA memory B cells and increased CD21low B-cell numbers. IgM+IgD- memory B cells were decreased in children and normal in adult patients. IGA and IGG transcripts contained normal SHM levels. In sIgAD children, IGA transcripts more frequently used IGA2 than controls (58.5% vs. 25.1%), but not in adult patients. B-cell activation after in vitro stimulation was normal. However, adult sIgAD patients exhibited increased blood levels of TGF-ß1, BAFF and APRIL, whereas they had decreased Th1 and Th17 cell numbers. CONCLUSION: Impaired IgA memory formation in sIgAD patients is not due to a B-cell activation defect. Instead, decreased Th1 and Th17 cell numbers and high blood levels of BAFF, APRIL and TGF-ß1 might reflect disturbed regulation of IgA responses in vivo.These insights into B-cell extrinsic immune defects suggest the need for a broader immunological focus on genomics and functional analyses to unravel the pathogenesis of sIgAD.

Deficiencia selectiva de inmunoglobulina A: manifestaciones clínicas, hallazgos de laboratorio y diagnóstico preciso / Selective Immunoglobulin A deficiency: clinical manifestations, laboratory findings and accurate diagnosis

Resumen La inmunoglobulina A (IgA) es el isotipo de anticuerpo más abundante en los humanos y fundamentalmente participa en la defensa contra las infecciones y el desarrollo de la tolerancia inmune en las mucosas. La deficiencia de IgA es la inmunodeficiencia más frecuente en humanos, pero comúnmente es asintomática y transitoria. Para diagnosticarla, se cuantifica la concentración de IgA en sangre y se evalúa la magnitud de su disminución. De acuerdo con esta evaluación se clasifica en deficiencia parcial (DPIgA) o deficiencia total (DTIgA). Adicionalmente, si solo se afectan los niveles de IgA sin alteraciones de otras inmunoglobulinas séricas como IgM e IgG o subclases de inmunoglobulina G, entonces se denomina como deficiencia selectiva de IgA (DSIgA). La deficiencia selectiva de IgA es de mayor relevancia clínica y considerada un error innato de la inmunidad, aunque su etiología aún es desconocida y clínicamente se asocia a infecciones de los tractos respiratorio y gastrointestinal, alergias y manifestaciones autoinmunes. Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos científicos en PubMed, Scopus, SciELO y Redalyc sobre la deficiencia selectiva de inmunoglobulina A, con el objetivo de realizar una revisión temática sobre las manifestaciones clínicas, el diagnóstico y el adecuado manejo clínico de los pacientes con esta inmunodeficiencia. Se propone un nuevo algoritmo clínico con el objetivo de mejorar el diagnóstico y brindar un adecuado manejo clínico de los pacientes con esta inmunodeficiencia. Un paciente con deficiencia selectiva de IgA se caracteriza por infecciones recurrentes de los tractos gastrointestinal y respiratorio, en asociación con manifestaciones alérgicas y autoinmunes en individuos mayores de cuatro años, con niveles de IgA sérica menores de 7 mg/dL y con niveles normales de IgG e IgM, y en quienes se hayan descartado defectos relacionados con los linfocitos T u otras causas de hipogammaglobulinemia. Con respecto al manejo clínico, se deben ajustar los esquemas de vacunación e implementar profilaxis antibiótica en las infecciones graves y recurrentes. Para mejorar el pronóstico se debe realizar una atención del paciente por un equipo médico interdisciplinario y un seguimiento continuo por un prolongado periodo de tiempo.

Abstract Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is the most abundant antibody isotype in humans and participates in protection against infections and the development of immune tolerance in mucous membranes. IgA deficiency is the most common immunodeficiency in humans, but it is commonly asymptomatic and transient. To diagnose it, the concentration of IgA in blood is quantified and the magnitude of its decrease is evaluated. According to this evaluation, it is classified as partial deficiency (DPIgA) or total deficiency (DTIgA). Additionally, if only IgA levels are affected without alterations in other serum immunoglobulins such as IgM and IgG or subclasses of IgG, then it is referred to as selective IgA deficiency (DSIgA). Selective IgA deficiency is of greater clinical relevance and considered an innate immunity error, although its etiology is still unknown. This immunodeficiency is clinically associated with respiratory and gas- trointestinal tract infections, allergies and autoimmune manifestations. A search of scientific articles was conducted in bibliographic databases PubMed, Scopus, SciELO and Redalyc on selective immunoglobulin A deficiency. Our objective was to perform a review on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and appropriate clinical management of patients with this immunodeficiency. A new clinical algorithm is proposed in order to improve the diagnosis and provide adequate clinical management of patients with this immunodeficiency. A patient with selective IgA deficiency is characterized by recurrent infections of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, in association with allergic and autoimmune manifestations in individuals older than four years. Serum IgA levels are less than 7 mg/dL, with normal levels of IgG and IgM, and defects related to T lymphocytes or other causes of hypogammaglobulinemia have been ruled out. Regarding clinical management, vaccination schedules should be adjusted and antibiotic prophylaxis should be implemented in severe and recurrent infections. Additionally, to improve prognosis, patient care should be performed by an interdisciplinary medical team and continuous monitoring for a prolonged period of time.

Diagnosis of gestational, congenital, and placental malaria in Colombia: comparison of the efficacy of microscopy, nested polymerase chain reaction, and histopathology.

The technical capability of different methods to diagnose Plasmodium in maternal peripheral blood, placenta, and umbilical cord blood has not been assessed in Colombia and seldom explored in other malaria-endemic regions. We designed a study to compare the technical and the operational-economical performances of light microscopy (LM), nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), and histopathology (HP). In maternal blood, LM had 41% sensitivity and 100% specificity and in placental blood, 35% and 100%, respectively, compared with nPCR. In placental tissue, LM had 33% sensitivity and 95% specificity; and nPCR 47% and 77%, respectively; compared with HP. Light microscopy had the best operational-economical qualification. We concluded that nPCR and HP performed better compared with LM, but field implementation of these two techniques remains a problem. Therefore, LM is recommended as the gold standard for diagnosis of gestational malaria and placental blood infection in the field.

Now ICT malaria Pf/Pv® frente a microscopía (gota gruesa-extendido)para diagnóstico de malaria en Urabá (Colombia) / Now ICT malaria Pf/Pv ® versus microscopy (thick-smear, thin smear) for diagnosis of malaria in Urabá (Colombia)

Problema: solo conocemos tres informes para Colombia de la prueba diagnóstica de malaria NowICT Malaria Pf/Pv ® (NowICT); esos estudios tuvieron resultados de sensibilidad y especificidad muy diferentes. Objetivo: evaluar la capacidad diagnóstica de NowICT frente a la gota gruesa para el diagnóstico de infección plasmodial en sangres periférica materna, del cordón umbilical y placentaria. Metodología: diseño paralelo y enmascarado para evaluación de una prueba diagnóstica. El tamaño de la muestra se calculó con parámetros epidemiológicos y estadísticos y fue de 131 muestras desangre periférica materna; también se examinaron sendas muestras de sangre placentaria y de cordón umbilical. Resultados: se evaluaron en total 386 muestras. La sensibilidad de NowICT para P. vivax no alcanzó70% en ninguna de las fuentes (madre, placenta, cordón). La especificidad mínima fue de 99%. Los valores para P. falciparum no se calcularon porque los casos fueron pocos. Conclusión: Now ICT malaria Pf/Pv® no es una herramienta diagnóstica útil en Colombia porque su sensibilidad para P. vivax es muy deficiente y en el país esta especie es la que predomina en la generación de malaria en humanos. Esta interpretación concuerda con las conclusiones generales de la OMS sobre el estado de desarrollo de las pruebas diagnósticas rápidas para malaria.

Problem: To date, there are only three reports from Colombia about the malaria diagnostic testNow ICT Malaria Pf / Pv ® (NowICT). The results from these studies showed major differences insensitivity and specificity. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of NowICT compared to thick smear for the diagnosis of Plasmodium infection in matched blood samples from mothers (maternal peripheral blood), umbilical cord and placenta. Methods: We used a closed (blinded/masked) and parallel design for the evaluation of a diagnostic test. The sample size was calculated with statistical and epidemiological parameters; this consisted of 131 thick smears from maternal peripheral blood. Blood samples from placenta and umbilical cord were also studied (386 samples tested in total). Results: The sensitivity of Now ICT for detection of P.vivax was below 70% in any of the samples (maternal blood, placental blood or cord blood). The specificity was greater than 99%. Values for P. falciparum infection were not calculated since too few cases were detected. Conclusions: Now ICT Malaria Pf / Pv ® is not a useful diagnostic tool in Colombia since the sensitivity for the most frequent species in the country, P. vivax, is poor. This interpretation is consistent with the WHO’s general conclusions about the state of development of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria.