Upper Extremity Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Comparative Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating injury. Restoring upper extremity function is a top priority, which can be accomplished by tendon transfer (TT) and nerve transfer (NT) surgeries. The purpose of this prospective comparative study was to assess long-term changes in UE function between surgical (TT or NT) and non-surgical groups through a comprehensive mixed methods approach. METHODS: This multicenter, cohort study compared data among three groups: those undergoing 1) no surgery 2) TT surgery, or 3) NT surgery. Quantitative data, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), was collected at baseline and long-term follow-up (6-24 months). Qualitative semi-structured interview data was also obtained from these participants and their identified caregivers at baseline, early follow-up (1 month), and long-term follow-up (6-24 months). RESULTS: Thirty-one participants had quantitative data across all timepoints: no surgery (n=14), TT (n=7), and NT (n=10). SCIM scores improved in TT and NT groups compared to the no surgery group (p<0.05). SF-36 scores did not differ among groups. Qualitative data analysis (n=168 interviews) corroborated SCIM findings: surgical participants and their caregivers reported improvement in transfers and ability to perform activities of daily living, including grooming and self-catheterization. Improved use of electronics and ability to operate a motor vehicle were also reported. Post-operative therapy was identified as a critical component of achieving gains. CONCLUSION: Both TT and NT surgery leads to quantitative and qualitative functional gains as compared to the no surgery group. This comparative information should be used to help surgeons discuss treatment options.

Comparing surgeries to restore upper extremity function in tetraplegia: Impact on function during the perioperative period.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To assess short-term changes in health outcomes in people with cervical-level spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent upper extremity (UE) reconstruction via either novel nerve transfer (NT) or traditional tendon transfer (TT) surgery with individuals who did not undergo UE surgical reconstruction. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative cohort pilot study. PARTICIPANTS: 34 participants with cervical SCI met the following inclusion criteria: age 18 or older, greater than 6 months post-injury, and mid-cervical level SCI American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B or C. SETTING: Two tertiary academic hospitals and their affiliated veterans' hospitals. METHODS: Health outcomes were assessed using two previously validated measures, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Demographic, surgical, and survey data were collected at the initial evaluation and one month postoperatively/post-baseline. RESULTS: 34 participants with cervical SCI were recruited across three cohorts: no surgery (n = 16), NT (n = 10), and TT (n = 8). The TT group had a decline in SCIM and SF-36 scores whereas the NT and no surgery groups experienced little change in independence or health status in the immediate perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons and rehabilitation providers must recognize differences in the perioperative needs of people with cervical SCI who chose to have restorative UE surgery. Future work should focus on further investigation of health outcomes, change in function, and improving preoperative counseling and cross-disciplinary management.

Skin Popping for the Hand Surgeon: A Case Report and Review.

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous injection of illicit drugs, colloquially known as skin popping, is associated with skin and soft tissue infections of the upper extremity. Sequelae of these infections often present to hand surgeons in the late stages of disease, are associated with challenging clinical scenarios, and are a significant burden to both patients and providers. The authors present an illustrative case and review the literature regarding this growing phenomenon in upper extremity surgery. METHODS: A case report detailing the surgical reconstruction of a large forearm wound in the setting of intravenous heroin use and skin popping is presented. Search terms related to upper extremity subcutaneous drug injection were used to find relevant articles in PubMed and EMBASE. A total of 488 articles were found, with 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In this case report, the patient had a long history of skin popping to the forearm and presented with a chronic wound with exposed bone. The patient was treated with serial debridement, bony fixation, intravenous antibiotics, and soft tissue coverage using an arteriovenous loop and a muscle-only latissimus flap. Literature review yielded 22 studies comprising 38 patients with 55% (11/20) women and age range of 23 to 58 years. Heroin was the most commonly used drug (50.0%). The most common presentation was soft tissue infection (6/20 patients), manifestations of noninfected wounds (5/20), and wound botulism (4/20 of patients). Seventy percent of patients presented with multiple injection sites. Surgical management was described in 18% of cases, with all but one case describing drainage and debridement techniques. Only one case of formal reconstruction using a dermal template was described. CONCLUSIONS: Skin popping infections have unique pathogenesis, presentation, and management patterns that hand surgeons must be aware of when treating these patients. A literature review revealed a relative paucity of reports regarding risk factors and surgical management of "skin popping" sequelae. If patients are reconstructive candidates, complex reconstruction requiring free tissue transfer may be warranted.

Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix for Revision Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Previously Treated with Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2).

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effectiveness of demineralized bone matrix (DBX) to close alveolar clefts in patients previously treated with bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) who remained with bone nonunion. DESIGN: This is an IRB-approved retrospective, single-center study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: We searched for all surgical encounters with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 42210 from the years 2013-2019. Included patients were diagnosed with cleft alveolus, previous BMP-2 exposure and required revision bone grafting during mixed dentition for persistent alveolar defects. INTERVENTIONS: 17 patients underwent revision alveolar bone grafting (ABG) with either DBX (n = 10) or autograft (n = 7) to repair persistent bony cleft. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary study outcome measured was alveolar bone graft revision failure described as continued alveolar nonunion. RESULTS: The median age at revision ABG was 13.1 ± 3.3 years, with a mean follow-up time of 4.9 years (1.1-9.2 years). Patients were 53% male, 47% had a unilateral cleft lip and alveolus. 58.8% of patients were treated with DBX in the cleft, 41.2% treated with autograft from iliac crest. Overall, 11.8% (n = 2) of all revisions failed, requiring a second revision. The average time to reoperation was 2.06 years, and both were re-grafted with autograft. There was no statistically significant difference between the type of bone graft source used and the failure rate obtained (P = .1544). CONCLUSIONS: DBX and autologous iliac crest bone grafts achieve similar alveolar union rates during revision ABG in patients treated with previous BMP-2 to the alveolar cleft.

Seeing Cleft Lip from a New Angle: Crowdsourcing to Determine whether Scar Severity or Lip Angle Matters More to the General Public.

BACKGROUND: Modern cleft lip surgery aims to restore symmetry and create a level, normal-appearing Cupid's bow. However, families' concerns often center on the degree of scarring. The authors hypothesized that the lip angle would be less influential than scar severity in layperson ratings. METHODS: The authors received institutional review board approval for modifying patients' postoperative photographs to create systematic variations displaying different levels of scarring and lip angle. Each child's resulting composite images were presented in pairs to internet raters using Amazon Mechanical Turk. Users selected the simulated postoperative result they felt to be most normal. The Bradley-Terry model was used to determine raters' preferences between different levels of scarring and lip angle. RESULTS: Four children with primary unilateral cleft lip repair had their postoperative photographs modified (mean age, 1.4 years; mean follow-up, 1.0 years). Twelve-hundred crowdsourced pairwise ratings were collected for each patient (4800 combined ratings). For all four children, raters preferred images with more severe scarring than those with a greater lip angle, suggesting uneven lip angle has a more negative effect on perceived appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Online crowdsourcing postoperative lip angle had a significantly greater influence on ratings of normal appearance than does the severity of scarring. Although patients may ask about scars more often, clinically, this study suggests perceptions of a cleft lip repair result may be more likely influenced by the angle of the cleft lip repair.

Quantifying Donor Deficits Following Nerve Transfer Surgery in Tetraplegia.

PURPOSE: Nerve transfer (NT) surgery can improve function in people with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the impact of donor nerve deficits remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantify donor deficits experienced by individuals with cervical SCI following NT. METHODS: This prospective single-arm, comparative study included people with SCI undergoing upper extremity NTs. Myometry was used to assess muscle strength at baseline and follow-up. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure was used to measure the ability to perform activities of daily living. RESULTS: Ten individuals underwent 20 NTs to restore elbow extension (donor, posterior deltoid; n = 2), hand opening (donor, supinator; n = 7), and hand closing (donor, brachialis; n = 11). Shoulder abduction strength decreased (-5.6% at early and -4.5% late follow-up) in the elbow extension NT. Wrist extension strength decreased at early (-46.9% ± 30.3) and increased by late (76.4% ± 154.0) follow-up in the hand opening NT. No statistically significant change in elbow flexion strength was noted in the hand closing NT. Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores did not change significantly between baseline and early postoperative follow-up; they improved at late follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Use of expendable donor nerves with redundant function to perform NT surgery has relatively little impact on strength or capacity to perform activities of daily living, even in the unique and highly vulnerable SCI population. Early, temporary loss in wrist extension strength can be seen after the supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer. This study offers quantitative data about possible diminution of donor function after NT, enabling hand surgeons to better counsel individuals contemplating upper extremity reconstruction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic I.

Pediatric Trigger Digit Presenting in the Setting of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trigger digit is a relatively rare condition with incompletely understood etiology. In our practice, we noted a series of children presenting with pediatric trigger digit after an associated local trauma to the hand, which has not been previously described. The aim of this study was to analyze the nature of presentation of trigger digits, the accuracy of initial diagnosis, and the impact on treatment strategies used. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institution's experience with pediatric trigger finger from 2001 to 2015 was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 26 affected digits were identified. Eighty-eight percent of patients were diagnosed with trigger thumb, whereas 3 patients (12%) had small finger triggering. Thirteen patients (59%) presented as outpatients, whereas 9 (41%) presented through the emergency department. All patients presenting to the emergency department were in the setting of recent minor trauma. Of this subset of patients, 67% had an incorrect initial diagnosis, leading to an average delay in treatment of 60 days. Ten patients (45% of total) were initially treated with immobilization versus surgical release of the A1 pulley. However, all but 2 of these patients required eventual A1 pulley release for persistent or recurrent triggering (88%). CONCLUSIONS: The cause of trigger digit in children remains incompletely understood and may be multifactorial. In this series, a traumatic component to presentation was found in a significant number of patients. This association with minor trauma may contribute to misdiagnosis and delay in definitive treatment. Although initial treatment with immobilization does not seem to impact surgical outcome, we found a high rate of failure with initial immobilization. Most patients required eventual surgical management, regardless of whether or not the initial presentation was associated with trauma. When performed, we found that A1 pulley release alone has safe, reliable results.

Three-dimensional printing in medicine: a systematic review of pediatric applications.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional printing (3DP) addresses distinct clinical challenges in pediatric care including: congenital variants, compact anatomy, high procedural risk, and growth over time. We hypothesized that patient-specific applications of 3DP in pediatrics could be categorized into concise, discrete categories of use. METHODS: Terms related to "three-dimensional printing" and "pediatrics" were searched on PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Initial search yielded 2122 unique articles; 139 articles characterizing 508 patients met full inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Four categories of patient-specific 3DP applications were identified: Teaching of families and medical staff (9.3%); Developing intervention strategies (33.9%); Procedural applications, including subtypes: contour models, guides, splints, and implants (43.0%); and Material manufacturing of shaping devices or prosthetics (14.0%). Procedural comparative studies found 3DP devices to be equivalent or better than conventional methods, with less operating time and fewer complications. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Medicine can be elegantly classified into four major categories: Teaching, Developing, Procedures, and Materials, sharing the same TDPM acronym. Understanding this schema is important because it promotes further innovation and increased implementation of these devices to improve pediatric care. IMPACT: This article classifies the pediatric applications of patient-specific three-dimensional printing. This is a first comprehensive review of patient-specific three-dimensional printing in both pediatric medical and surgical disciplines, incorporating previously described classification schema to create one unifying paradigm. Understanding these applications is important since three-dimensional printing addresses challenges that are uniquely pediatric including compact anatomy, unique congenital variants, greater procedural risk, and growth over time. We identified four classifications of patient-specific use: teaching, developing, procedural, and material uses. By classifying these applications, this review promotes understanding and incorporation of this expanding technology to improve the pediatric care.

Transforming assessment of speech in children with cleft palate via online crowdsourcing.

OBJECTIVE: Speech intelligibility is fundamental to social interactions and a critical surgical outcome in patients with cleft palate. Online crowdsourcing is a burgeoning technology, with potential to mitigate the burden of limited accessibility to speech-language-pathologists (SLPs). This pilot study investigates the concordance of online crowdsourced evaluations of hypernasality with SLP ratings of children with cleft palate. METHODS: Six audio-phrases each from children with cleft palate were assessed by online crowdsourcing using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), and compared to SLP's gold-standard hypernasality score on the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score (PWSS). Phrases were presented to MTurk crowdsourced lay-raters to assess hypernasality on a Likert scale analogous to the PWSS. The survey included clickable reference audio samples for different levels of hypernasality. RESULTS: 1,088 unique online crowdsourced speech ratings were collected on 16 sentences of 3 children with cleft palate aged 4-8 years, with audio averaging 6.5 years follow-up after cleft palate surgery. Patient 1 crowd-mean was 2.62 (SLP rated 2-3); Patient 2 crowd-mean 2.66 (SLP rated 3); and Patient 3 crowd-mean 1.76 (SLP rated 2). Rounded for consistency with PWSS scale, all patients matched SLP ratings. Different sentences had different accuracies compared to the SLP gold standard scores. CONCLUSION: Online crowdsourced ratings of hypernasal speech in children with cleft palate were concordant with SLP ratings, predicting SLP scores in all 3 patients. This novel technology has potential for translation in clinical speech assessments, and may serve as a valuable screening tool for non-experts to identify children requiring further assessment and intervention by a qualified speech language pathology expert.

Systematic Review: Online Crowdsourcing to Assess Perceptual Speech Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Speech is integral for human interaction and development. Speech assessments are critical in the growing child, especially in the surgical evaluation of patients undergoing cleft palate and speech surgeries. Online crowdsourcing enables layperson raters, allowing rapid and large-scale data collection. This systematic review analyzes the utility of online crowdsourcing to evaluate perceptual speech outcomes. METHODS: Terms related to "crowdsourcing" and "speech" were searched on PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PsycINFO on August 16, 2017, returning 2812 unique articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria concentrated on online crowdsourcing of perceptual speech outcomes: titles led to 140 abstracts that yielded 35 full-text articles, of which eight articles met criteria for analysis. RESULTS: All studies used Amazon Mechanical Turk for online crowd raters, and one used an additional crowdsourcing site (CrowdFlower). Disordered speech was provided by 376 speakers, for which 2203 crowd workers produced over 700,000 unique ratings. Five studies compared crowdsourced assessments to gold standards and found high concordances. Data collection time ranged from 59 min to 23 h, with worker payments ranging from $0.05 to $2.00 per task. Studies examined child pronunciation of the /r/ sound, dysarthria in Parkinson's speech, and articulation of English words produced by non-English speakers learning English. CONCLUSIONS: Online crowdsourcing for perceptual speech outcomes provides high-quality data consistent with previous speech-assessment standards in a rapid, cost-effective manner. This novel methodology incorporates lay perspective of speech intelligibility and has the potential to revolutionize surgical speech outcome assessments, including cleft palate and speech surgery.