Institutional policy consideration for medical cannabis.

With expanding legalization and cultural acceptance of cannabis, consumption among older adults in institutional care settings is increasing. State-by-state regulations vary widely and are evolving rapidly, adding layers of complexity to institutional policy and transitions of care. Owing to its current federal legal status, physicians cannot prescribe or dispense medical cannabis-they may only issue a recommendation for medical cannabis consumption. Furthermore, owing to the federally illicit status of cannabis, institutions accredited through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) may risk their CMS contracts if they accept cannabis in their facilities. Institutions should clarify their policy around the specific cannabis formulations approved for on-site storage and administration, including safe handling and appropriate storage. Inhalation dosage forms of cannabis require additional considerations in institutional settings, such as secondhand exposure prevention and adequate ventilation. As with other controlled substances, institutional policies to prevent diversion are essential, such as secure storage, staff procedures, and inventory documentation. Cannabis consumption should be included in patient medical histories, medication reconciliation, medication therapy management, and other evidence-based methods to reduce the risk of potential medication-cannabis interactions during transitions of care.

Reporting ethical protections in physical therapy research.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Efforts to make physical therapy more evidence based have increased demand for human participants, raising concerns for their safety and welfare. This study examined how often research articles in physical therapy journals report basic ethical protections. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective audit of research articles in 6 physical therapy journals between 1996 and 2001. RESULTS: Of 806 articles reviewed, 48% documented both research ethics committee approval and informed consent. Articles reporting clinical interventions had the highest reported rate (64%) of both protections. Articles reporting qualitative methods, chart reviews, and case reports had the lowest rates of documentation of both requirements: 30%, 17%, and 11%, respectively. Reported rates of both requirements in vulnerable populations were 55% for children, 48% for students, and 33% for employees. Twenty-six percent of articles included confidentiality assurances. Case reports were most likely and chart reviews were least likely to mention confidentiality: 88% and 8%, respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There is no uniform editorial policy among physical therapy journals for reporting basic ethical requirements. Physical therapy journals should standardize ethical protections and make documentation of compliance a prerequisite of publication.