ABSTRACT
Hard tissue modification by means of laser irradiation is becoming popular in dentistry, since it promotes assorted responses between the tooth and the restorative material. Some studies on the bond strength of adhesive systems to Nd:YAG irradiated teeth have shown distinctive behaviors when irradiation was applied before or after the adhesive agent. This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength of a commercial adhesive system to dentin irradiated with Nd:YAG laser after adhesive application but prior to polymerization. The experiment was conducted in vitro, using freshly extracted human teeth as samples. For the microtensile test, the teeth were separated into 4 different groups according to the energy density of laser irradiation: 0, 5, 10 and 50 J/cm2. The data was analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and LSD tests, and the results indicated that the group that was irradiated with 5 J/cm2 had significantly higher bond strength values. Adhesive penetration on the etched dentin was observed by scanning electron microscopy, where the images showed better adhesive penetration on dentinal tubules after dentin irradiation with 5 J/cm2. Based on the results of this study, it is possible to conclude that irradiation of dentin with the Nd:YAG laser at low energy densities after application of the adhesive but prior to polymerization might be positive for the adhesive restorative process.
Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin/radiation effects , Lasers , Acid Etching, Dental , Aluminum Silicates , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Dentin/ultrastructure , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Neodymium , Radiation Dosage , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , YttriumABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS: Finishing of composites may adversely influence the sealing ability of direct adhesive restorations. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine whether finishing time and techniques under wet or dry conditions affect the microleakage of 2 types of class V composite restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty class V preparations were made in the buccal surfaces of noncarious molars with the occlusal margins ending in enamel and the gingival margins in dentin. Dental adhesive (Single Bond) was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Half of the preparations were restored with a microfilled composite (Silux Plus) and the other half with a hybrid composite (Filtek Z250). Within each major composite group (n = 40), 4 subgroups (n = 10) were established based on finishing technique (diamond finishing burs or aluminum oxide discs) and finishing time (immediate or delayed by 24 hours). The specimens were stored for 24 hours in 37 degrees C water, thermocycled for 250 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for another 24 hours, and sectioned longitudinally. For both enamel and dentin margins, dye solution penetration at the tooth/composite interface was scored from 0 to 4 under stereoscopy at original magnification x 20. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test (P<.05). RESULTS: Significantly lower leakage scores were recorded for teeth restored with microfilled composite and finished under wet conditions after 24 hours (P<.01). No significant differences were found among the hybrid composite groups. CONCLUSION: For microfilled composite restorations on dentin margins, delayed wet finishing with diamond burs resulted in significantly lower microleakage scores than all other finishing protocols. Hybrid composite restorations had equivalent levels of microleakage regardless of the finishing method.
