ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: The goal of the present study was to systematically evaluate the effect of a booster vaccination with the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA; Pfizer-BioNTech®) vaccine on maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max), potential signs of (peri)myocarditis, and sports participation. Methods: Recreational athletes who were scheduled to undergo booster vaccination were evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography, serum measurements of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hsCRP) and high-sensitivity troponin I, and a bicycle cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with serum lactate evaluation before the booster vaccine administration. Seven days postvaccination the test battery was repeated. Additionally, the subjects were asked to fill in a questionnaire on side effects and a subjective evaluation of their relative training volume and intensity as compared to the weeks before vaccination. Results: A group of 42 analysed athletes showed a statistically significant 2.7% decrease in VO2 max after vaccination (mean standard error of mean pre: 48.6 (1.4) ml/kg/min; post: 47.3 (1.4) ml/kg/min; p = 0.004). A potentially clinically relevant decrease of 8.6% or more occurred in 8 (19%) athletes. Other CPET parameters and lactate curves were comparable. We found no serological or echocardiographic evidence of (peri)myocarditis. A slight but significant increase in hsCRP was noted 1 week after vaccination. Side effects were mild and sports participation was generally unchanged or mildly decreased after vaccination. Conclusion: In our population of recreational endurance athletes, booster vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine resulted in a statistically significant decrease in VO2max 7 days after vaccination. The clinical impact hereof needs to be further determined. No major adverse events were observed.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: It is recommended that cancer survivors incorporate physical activity into their daily lives after in-hospital rehabilitation. However, there is a lack of training programmes focusing on the specific needs of cancer survivors. TriaGO! - an 8-month intervention study of aerobic endurance training for cancer survivors - was therefore examined. The training programme aims to meet the participants' physical needs and provide socio-emotional support, in the form of an exercise programme that challenges participants to aim to compete in an Olympic- distance triathlon (1,000 m swimming, 45 km cycling, 10 km running) after 8 months' of training. METHODS: The TriaGO! training programme was provided to in-hospital rehabilitated cancer survivors (n = 12). Each patient invited a healthy friend or family member to train with them (a so called buddy (n = 12)). The 8-month programme involves supervised training sessions, combining cycling, swimming and running, which progress in frequency, duration and intensity. Physical health was measured at the start, 4 and 8 months, using objective parameters of aerobic fitness, muscular fitness and body composition. RESULTS: A total of 22 out of 24 participants successfully completed the training programme and the triathlon. Both the cancer survivors and their buddies showed significant improvements in physical health. Cancer survivors showed improvements in aerobic fitness, as increases in VO2max and VO2peak of 5.5 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 0.26 ml.min-1 respectively (p <0.0001). Buddies underwent similar significant increases; 5.39 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 0.18 ml.min-1, respectively. CONCLUSION: The TriaGO! training programme introduces the concept of supervised endurance training for cancer survivors. Through measurement of ob-jective parameters, this study demonstrated that significant physical reconditioning is possible in cancer survivors. A supervised programme would be recommended for all cancer patients after in-hospital treatment, in order to facilitate the transition to incorporation of physical activity into daily life.
