Clinical Readiness: Can Providers Learn to Perform Lower Leg Fasciotomy Through a Tablet-based Augmented Reality Surgical Training Environment?

INTRODUCTION: The uses of on-demand, interactive tablet-based surgical training environments are of interest as potential resources for both the acquisition and maintenance of rarely performed, critical procedures for expeditionary surgical care. This study examined the effectiveness of a tablet-based augmented reality (AR) procedural training environment for lower leg fasciotomy with a cohort of novice surgical trainees in (1) procedural knowledge, (2) tablet-based procedural skills, (3) tablet-based procedural time, and (4) procedural performance on a cadaver. We hypothesized that engaging with the AR procedural training would increase procedural knowledge and tablet-based skills and procedural time. We hypothesized that the tablet-based AR training environment would be insufficient to acquire the ability to perform lower leg fasciotomy on a cadaver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved as exempt by the Institutional Review Board at USU. Surgical interns, sub-interns, and independent duty corpsman (n = 30) with no prior lower leg fasciotomy experience voluntarily participated. Tablet-based training activities included pre-training assessment, engagement with instruction, interactive procedural practice, and post-training assessment. Tablet-based knowledge assessment included 17 multiple choice questions covering concepts, reasoning, and judgment associated with the procedure. Tablet-based procedural completion and time were assessed within the training environment. Within 1 week of completing the tablet activities, participants were assessed by fellowship-trained trauma surgeons while performing cadaver-based lower leg fasciotomy. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests and effect size (Cohen's d). Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Tablet-based AR procedural training significantly improved procedural knowledge (P < .001), tablet-based procedural skills (P < .001), and reduced tablet-based procedural time (P < .002). Effect sizes were very large for tablet-based procedural knowledge (d = 1.75) and skills (d = 3.2) and small (d = 0.42) for procedural time. There were no significant effects of procedural knowledge, tablet-based procedural skills, or time on cadaver-based performance. No participant was able to accurately and independently complete lower leg fasciotomy procedure on a cadaver. CONCLUSIONS: Tablet-based AR procedural training improved procedural knowledge and tablet-based skills; however, those gains did not transfer to the ability to perform the procedure on a cadaver. The tablet's limited AR interface did not support the acquisition of requisite surgical technique, tissue handling, and decision-making in novice surgical trainees. Experienced surgeons may have different outcomes because their mature understanding of surgical constructs would allow extrapolation of abilities to other procedural contexts. Further investigation of the tablet-based training environments for surgical care is necessary before distributing such resources to support clinical readiness.

Development of Ventral Hernia Repair Curriculum Using the AWSSOM-a Synthetic Abdominal Wall Surgical Skills Operational Model.

INTRODUCTION: Ventral hernia repair cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly 3 billion dollars annually. Surgical repair is a critical competency for residents yet hernia recurrence rates following mesh-based repair range from 0.8% to 24%. Improving surgical techniques using cadavers is often cost-prohibited for many education programs and limited research exists using simulation models with a corresponding hernia repair curriculum in the graduate medical education setting. This pilot project aimed to develop a low cost, easily reproducible novel abdominal wall reconstruction model and pilot-test the ventral hernia repair curriculum to inform further refinement prior to formal evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This descriptive study pilot-tested the newly refined Abdominal Wall Surgical Skills Operative Model (AWSSOM) simulator for ventral hernia repair with mesh and its corresponding 2-h training curriculum for use at all levels of general surgery graduate medical education. The AWSSOM is a 3D printed synthetic anatomically realistic abdominal wall model consisting of silicone cured layers of skin, fat, rectus abdominis and a posterior rectus sheath fascia, and silicone tubules to simulate lateral neurovascular bundles. The curriculum incorporated didactic content reflecting surgical practice guidelines, hands-on practice, and faculty guidance promoting interactive critical thinking development during task performance. A pre-/post-assessment included a 10-item knowledge test, a 19-item psychomotor assessment, and 4-items confidence survey to examine changes in performance, knowledge, and confidence in competently completing the ventral hernia repair technique. Descriptive statistics were used to report the limited results of six military surgical resident participants and inform further model and curriculum refinement prior to formal evaluation. RESULTS: The five-layer AWSSOM model was manufactured in 65 h at a material cost of $87 per model frame, is reusable model, and secure base. Six surgical residents were recruited; only four completed both pre- and post-tests due to resident schedule conflicts. The average increase in knowledge was 25%, although variable changes in confidence were observed over the four program year participants. A larger sample size and a control group are needed to demonstrate curriculum effectiveness at improving knowledge, performance, and confidence in ventral hernia repair with mesh and better delineate if high scores translate to better operative skills. A key improvement requested by residents was a more secure model base for dissection and performance of the hernia repair. CONCLUSIONS: The novel abdominal wall surgical skills operative model fills an important proof of concept gap in simulation training. It is low cost with the potential to improve cognitive and psychomotor skills, as well as confidence to competently complete ventral hernia repair with mesh in the graduate medical education setting. Prior to formal effectiveness testing, our lessons learned should be addressed in both the model and curriculum. Future studies must include an adequately powered statistical evaluation with a larger sample across all levels of training.

Development and Implementation of Urologic Care Army/Air Force/Navy Provider Education, a Urologic Emergency Simulation Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Military general surgeons commonly perform urologic procedures, yet, there are no required urologic procedural minimums during general surgery residency training. Additionally, urologists are not included in the composition of forward operating surgical units. Urologic Care Army/Air Force/Navy Provider Education was created to provide military general surgeons with training to diagnose and treat frequently encountered urologic emergencies when practicing in environments without a urologist present. STUDY DESIGN: A literature review and needs assessment were conducted to identify diagnoses and procedures to feature in the course. The course included a 1-hour didactic session and then a 2-hour hands-on simulated skills session using small, lightweight, cost-effective simulators. Using a pretest-posttest design, participants completed confidence and knowledge assessments before and after the course. The program was granted educational exemption by the institutional review board. RESULTS: Twenty-seven learners participated. They demonstrated statistically significant improvement on the knowledge assessment (45.4% [SD 0.15] to 83.6% [SD 0.10], P < .01). On the confidence assessment, there were statistically significant (P ≤ .001) improvements for identifying phimosis, paraphimosis, and testicular torsion, as well as identifying indications for suprapubic catheterization, retrograde urethrogram, and cystogram. There were also statistically significant (P < .001) improvements for performing: suprapubic catheterization, dorsal penile block, dorsal slit, scrotal exploration, orchiopexy, orchiectomy, retrograde urethrogram, and cystogram. CONCLUSION: We created the first-ever urologic emergencies simulation curriculum for military general surgeons that has demonstrated efficacy in improving the diagnostic confidence, procedural confidence, and topic knowledge for the urologic emergencies commonly encountered by military general surgeons.

Upper-Extremity Vascular Exposures for Trauma: Comparative Performance Outcomes for General Surgeons and Orthopedic Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: As combat-related trauma decreases, there remains an increasing need to maintain the ability to care for trauma victims from other casualty events around the world (e.g., terrorism, natural disasters, and infrastructure failures). During these events, military surgeons often work closely with their civilian counterparts, often in austere and expeditionary contexts. In these environments, the primary aim of the surgical team is to implement damage control principles to avert blood loss, optimize oxygenation, and improve survival. Upper-extremity vascular injuries are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality resulting from exsanguination and ischemic complications; however, fatalities may be avoided if hemorrhage is rapidly controlled. In austere contexts, deployed surgical teams typically include one general surgeon and one orthopedic surgeon, neither of which have acquired the expertise to manage these vascular injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine the baseline capabilities of general surgeons and orthopedic surgeons to surgically expose and control axillary and brachial arteries and to determine if the abilities of both groups could be increased through a focused cadaver-based training intervention. METHODS: This study received IRB approval at our institution. Study methods included the use of cadavers for baseline assessment of procedural capabilities to expose and control axillary and brachial vessels, followed by 1:1 procedural training and posttraining re-assessment of procedural capabilities. Inferential analyses included ANOVA/MANOVA for within- and between-group effects (P < .05). Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Study outcomes demonstrated significant differences between the baseline performance abilities of the two groups, with general surgeons outperforming orthopedic surgeons. Before training, neither group reached performance benchmarks for overall or critical procedural abilities in exposing axillary and brachial vessels. Training led to increased abilities for both groups. There were statistically significant gains for overall procedural abilities, as well as for critical procedural elements that are directly associated with morbidity and mortality. These outcomes were consistent for both general and orthopedic surgeons. Effect sizes ranged between medium (general surgeons) and very large (orthopedic surgeons). CONCLUSION: There was a baseline capability gap for both general surgeons and orthopedic surgeons to surgically expose and control the axillary and brachial vessels. Outcomes from the course suggest that the methodology facilitates the acquisition of accurate and independent vascular procedural capabilities in the management of upper-extremity trauma injuries. The impact of this training for surgeons situated in expeditionary or remote contexts has direct relevance for caring for victims of extremity trauma. These outcomes underscore the need to train all surgeons serving in rural, remote, expeditionary, combat, or global health contexts to be able to competently manage extremity trauma and concurrent vascular injuries to increase the quality of care in those settings.

Early implementation of Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery training using a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum.

BACKGROUND: After the American Board of Surgery announcement of the Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum requirement in 2014, we implemented a dedicated endoscopy rotation at the post graduate year (PGY)2 level including a simulation curriculum for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery skills. Here we evaluate the outcomes of this implementation. METHODS: Beginning in 2015, we developed a clinical endoscopy and simulation-based rotation to prepare for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery testing. Originally, our curriculum was based on the published Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories curriculum using the GI Mentor and transitioned to a mastery learning curriculum using the Endoscopy Training System in 2016. We evaluated the success of the curriculum in terms of first-time pass rates, training time required, and comparison to previously published benchmarks based on clinical experience. RESULTS: Since 2015, a total of 37 general surgery residents in our program were Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery tested (PGY2 = 24, PGY3 = 4, PGY5 = 9); 84% (31) completed the Endoscopy Training System curriculum. At the time of testing, 73% (27) had performed <25 esophagogastroduodenoscopies, and 46% had performed <25 colonoscopies. Ninety-two percent (34) spent 10 hours or less completing the curriculum. The first-time pass rate for those completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum was 97% vs 67% for those not completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum (P = .01). For residents completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum, total Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery scores were discernibly higher (472 vs 389, P < .01), as were 3/5 task scores (Nav1 80 vs 67, P = .02; Loop2 36 vs 8, P = .02; Retro3 89 vs 71, P = .02). Despite clinical inexperience (<25 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and <50 colonoscopies), PGY2s yielded a mean score of 454 and a pass rate of 92%. This was similar to PGY5s (427, 89%; P = .3) and compares to benchmark data of endoscopists with >300 cases. CONCLUSION: Early implementation of flexible endoscopy training with a simulation-based curriculum results in Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance equal to a clinical experience not often gained during surgical residency. Often requiring <10 hours, this represents a fantastic return on investment for this training.

Piloting the FIRE: A Novel Error Management Training Simulation Curriculum for Fasciotomy Instruction.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated poor performance of lower extremity fasciotomy (LEF), highlighted by missed and/or inadequately released compartments. Incorporating error management training (EMT) into surgical simulation has been promoted as a way to gain deeper understanding of procedural errors and overall performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate LEF performance using a Fasciotomy Improvement through Recognition of Errors (FIRE) simulation training curriculum to train novice surgical trainees. METHODS: A mastery learning-based EMT curriculum was developed, and surgical residents were enrolled and pretested with a multiple-choice question (MCQ) written test, and a simulated fasciotomy using a lower leg model. Each trainee then watched a 15-minute narrated presentation followed by 2 rounds of fasciotomy error recognition and management training exercises to a mastery standard. During each round, trainees performed hands-on assessment of unique premade fasciotomy leg models containing a variable number of procedural errors. They were required to identify and propose corrective action for all errors. Serial rounds of remediation were implemented until the mastery standard was attained on both error identification rounds. All trainees were post-tested with the same MCQ and another simulated fasciotomy. RESULTS: All 14 residents had minimal experience with only 0.3 ± 0.6 fasciotomies performed prior to instruction. There were 3 ± 1.6 missed or inadequately released compartments on the pretest. Residents examined 14 ± 2.5 legs, including 2 ± 2.5 legs during remediation to attain mastery. All residents demonstrated significant improvement following the FIRE of Error curriculum for the MCQ (57% ± 16% vs 78% ± 13%; p = 0.01; Cohen's d = 1.4), fasciotomy score (10 ± 7.1 vs 28 ± 1.9; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 3.6), and achieving a complete fasciotomy (14% ± 36% vs 93% ± 27%; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.5). Only a single cumulative compartment was missed on post-testing. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a mastery learning-based EMT curriculum for fasciotomy simulation training results in significant improvement in fasciotomy technique without reliance on repeated procedure performance nor clinical fasciotomy exposure. This curriculum is a highly effective option for surgical trainees lacking fasciotomy training during residency.

Fasciotomy Improvement Through Recognition of Errors Course: A Focused Needs Assessment for Error Management Training for Lower Extremity Fasciotomy Performance.

BACKGROUND: Many injuries from recent wars involve extremity trauma secondary to blasts, which predispose patients to developing extremity compartment syndrome. In military studies, 17% of fasciotomies required revision on arrival to a Role 4 hospital, and 41% of these had missed compartments, which is similar to that seen in civilian centers. While training has decreased this rate to 8%, this number is still too high. We conducted a focused needs assessment to guide the development of lower-extremity fasciotomy training. METHODS: In a predeployment assessment, 42 military surgeons performed a 2-incision, 4-compartment, lower-extremity fasciotomy on simulated lower leg models. Models were assessed for standardized and objectively-assessed major (inadequate skin or fascial incisions, missed compartments) and minor (failure to make an H-shaped incision over the lateral compartments, division of the greater saphenous vein) errors based on joint Trauma System clinical practice guidelines and approved training curricula. RESULTS: Four of 42 (9.5%) models contained no errors. Models averaged 4.3 ± 2.6 major and 0.3 ± 0.5 minor errors. 11 models (26.2%) had at least one missed compartment. The most common missed compartments were the deep posterior (17%) and anterior (14%). 29 (69%) had inadequate or poorly-placed skin incisions, with the most common being inadequate distal extension of the medial (10, 24%) and lateral (14, 33%) incisions, inadequate proximal extension of the lateral incision (6, 14%), medial incision too close to the tibia (7, 17%), and lateral incision over or behind the fibula (12, 29%). A total of 36 (86%) had inadequate fascial incisions. Inadequate fasciotomies were seen in the anterior (57%), lateral (55%), superficial (52%), and deep (34%) posterior compartments CONCLUSIONS: Performance on the models approximates what has been seen in military and civilian settings. This needs assessment will inform development of a simulation curriculum based on error-management and mastery learning theory to reduce the morbidity of lower-extremity compartment syndrome.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Emotional Intelligence in Military General Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Higher emotional Intelligence (EI) is linked to improved doctor-patient relationships, empathy, teamwork, communication skills, stress management, and leadership in medicine. This study analyzes the effects of age, postgraduate year (PGY), gender, and prior military experience on EI in military general surgery residents, and compares these to the general population and civilian surgery residents. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, observational study. Results were analyzed using independent sample t test and linear regression to compare general surgery residents with the normative population and civilian general surgery residents. SETTING: The general surgery department at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, a single-center, academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents, PGY 1 to 6, were surveyed at the beginning of academic year, in June 2016. RESULTS: There were no statistically discernable differences in global EI between male (n = 27) and female residents (n = 19), PGY, or prior military experience. Female general surgery residents show higher global EI, and both males and females scored higher in the self-control factor than the normative population. Mid-residency, there is a nonstatistically discernible dip in many factors and facets of EI. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences in EI present in the general population were not appreciated in our cohort of surgery residents, which confirms the results of previous studies. This may be due to the fact that general surgery residents are a more uniform group than the population at large. Additionally, our cohort of military surgery residents demonstrated similar global EI to civilian surgery residents. While PGY had no statistically discernable affect on global, facet, or factor EI, more studies are needed to longitudinally follow changes in EI over the course of surgery residency.

Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System.

BACKGROUND: The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam is required for American Board of Surgery certification. The purpose of this study was to develop performance standards for a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for the FES performance exam using the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). METHODS: Experienced endoscopists from multiple institutions and specialties performed each ETS task (scope manipulation (SM), tool targeting (TT), retroflexion (RF), loop management (LM), and mucosal inspection (MI)) with scores used to develop performance standards for a SBML training curriculum. Trainees completed the curriculum to determine feasibility, and effect on FES performance. RESULTS: Task specific training standards were determined (SM-121sec, TT-243sec, RF-159sec, LM-261sec, MI-180-480sec, 7 polyps). Trainees required 29.5 ± 3.7 training trials over 2.75 ± 0.5 training sessions to complete the SBML curriculum. Despite high baseline FES performance, scores improved (pre 73.4 ± 7, post 78.1 ± 5.2; effect size = 0.76, p > 0.1), but this was not statistically discernable. CONCLUSIONS: This SBML curriculum was feasible and improved FES scores in a group of high performers. This curriculum should be applied to novice endoscopists to determine effectiveness for FES exam preparation.

Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam.

INTRODUCTION: The fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) program has considerable validity evidence for its use in measuring the knowledge, skills, and abilities required for competency in endoscopy. Beginning in 2018, the American Board of Surgery will require all candidates to have taken and passed the written and performance exams in the FES program. Recent work has shown that the current ACGME/ABS required case volume may not be enough to ensure trainees pass the FES skills exam. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a simulation-based mastery-learning curriculum delivered on a novel physical simulation platform to prepare trainees to pass the FES manual skills exam. METHODS: The newly developed endoscopy training system (ETS) was used as the training platform. Seventeen PGY 1 (10) and PGY 2 (7) general surgery residents completed a pre-training assessment consisting of all 5 FES tasks on the GI Mentor II. Subjects then trained to previously determined expert performance benchmarks on each of 5 ETS tasks. Once training benchmarks were reached for all tasks, a post-training assessment was performed with all 5 FES tasks. RESULTS: Two subjects were lost to follow-up and never returned for training or post-training assessment. One additional subject failed to complete any portion of the curriculum, but did return for post-training assessment. The group had minimal endoscopy experience (median 0, range 0-67) and minimal prior simulation experience. Three trainees (17.6%) achieved a passing score on the pre-training FES assessment. Training consisted of an average of 48 ± 26 repetitions on the ETS platform distributed over 5.1 ± 2 training sessions. Seventy-one percent achieved proficiency on all 5 ETS tasks. There was dramatic improvement demonstrated on the mean post-training FES assessment when compared to pre-training (74.0 ± 8 vs. 50.4 ± 16, p < 0.0001, effect size = 2.4). The number of ETS tasks trained to proficiency correlated moderately with the score on the post-training assessment (r = 0.57, p = 0.028). Fourteen (100%) subjects who trained to proficiency on at least one ETS task passed the post-training FES manual skills exam. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation-based mastery learning curriculum using the ETS is feasible for training novices and allows for the acquisition of the technical skills required to pass the FES manual skills exam. This curriculum should be strongly considered by programs wishing to ensure that trainees are prepared for the FES exam.

Do Resident Case Logs Meet ACGME Requirements? A Comparison Between Acute Care and Elective Cases.

PURPOSE: Operative experience is at the core of general surgery residency, and recently operative volume requirements for graduating residents were increased. The ACGME has outlined 4 areas of required resident participation and documentation in order for a surgical case to be logged: determination or confirmation of the diagnosis, provision of preoperative care, selection and accomplishment of the operative procedure, and direction of the postoperative care. The purpose of this study was to examine whether general surgery residents are currently meeting the required care participation documentation standard and to examine the effect of acute care vs. elective cases on documentation. METHODS: The operative case logs of 7 PGY-3 and 7 PGY-5 general surgery residents from March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and compared to the electronic medical record (EMR) to verify documentation of resident participation in each of the 4 required areas. Chart review was also utilized to classify cases as either acute care or elective. RESULTS: A total of 339 cases were reviewed (159 PGY-3 and 180 PGY-5). Of these, 251 cases were classified as elective and 88 were classified as acute care. Overall, documentation of comprehensive care (participation in all four required areas) was found for 44% of cases, with residents reporting participation in a higher percentage of comprehensive care (all 4 domains completed) than was actually documented in the EMR (71.9% vs. 44.4%, t[13] = 2.57, p = 0.023, d = 1.13). Comprehensive care was documented more frequently in elective cases than acute care cases (49.7% vs. 38.3%), and there was less discrepancy between perceived and documented comprehensive care within elective cases (67% vs. 49.7%, t[13] = 1.17, p = 0.27) than acute care cases (80.9% vs. 38.3%, t[13] = 4.40, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite ACGME requirements, the majority of cases logged by general surgery residents do not have documentation by the operating resident in the EMR verifying provision of comprehensive care. Elective cases were more likely to meet documentation requirements than acute care cases, and we purport that this is possibly secondary to restricted work hours. We expect that other programs would find similar compliance in the documentation of comprehensive care. These results question whether the requirement for documenting comprehensive care to log a surgical case is practical in surgical residency training, particularly with an increasing demand for operative volume in the setting of limited work hours.

Laparoscopy for Colon Cancer.

The use of laparoscopy has become widespread across many surgical specialties. Its utility as treatment for colon cancer was initially met with hesitancy due to concern for port site and wound recurrences; however, this was later disproven by large retrospective series. Subsequently, there have been multiple, large, prospective, randomized studies evaluating laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer. All studies yielded similar results and showed no statistical difference in overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence. Additionally, these studies revealed similar operative outcomes with respect to complication rates, perioperative mortality, and conversion to open colectomy, as well as equivalent oncologic resections. Overall in the laparoscopic colectomy groups, hospital stays were shorter, and often times patients required less narcotics postoperatively, but laparoscopic operative times were longer. With adequate training, the use of laparoscopy can be safely employed for patients with colon cancer.

Cost Comparison of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Training Completed With Standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment versus Low-Cost Equipment.

OBJECTIVE: Training for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skills test can be expensive. Previous work demonstrated that training on an ergonomically different, low-cost platform does not affect FLS skills test outcomes. This study compares the average training cost with standard FLS equipment and medical-grade consumables versus training on a lower cost platform with non-medical-grade consumables. DESIGN: Subjects were prospectively randomized to either the standard FLS training platform (n = 19) with medical-grade consumables (S-FLS), or the low-cost platform (n = 20) with training-grade products (LC-FLS). Both groups trained to proficiency using previously established mastery learning standards on the 5 FLS tasks. The fixed and consumable cost differences were compared. SETTING: Training occurred in a surgical simulation center. PARTICIPANTS: Laparoscopic novice medical student and resident physician health care professionals who had not completed the national FLS proficiency curriculum and who had performed less than 10 laparoscopic cases. RESULTS: The fixed cost of the platform was considerably higher in the S-FLS group (S-FLS, $3360; LC-FLS, $879), and the average consumable training cost was significantly higher for the S-FLS group (S-FLS, $1384.52; LC-FLS, $153.79; p < 0.001). The LC-FLS group had a statistically discernable cost reduction for each consumable (Gauze $9.24 vs. $0.39, p = 0.002; EndoLoop $540.00 vs. $40.60, p < 0.001; extracorporeal suture $216.45 vs. $25.20, p < 0.001; intracorporeal suture $618.83 vs. $87.60, p < 0.001). The annual fixed and consumable cost to train 5 residents is $10,282.60 in the S-FLS group versus $1647.95 in the LC-FLS group. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the average cost to train a single trainee to proficiency using a lower fixed-cost platform and non-medical-grade equipment results in significant financial savings. A 5-resident program will save approximately $8500 annually. Residency programs should consider adopting this strategy to reduce the cost of FLS training.

Outcomes of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) mastery training standards applied to an ergonomically different, lower cost platform.

OBJECTIVE: Using previously established mastery learning standards, this study compares outcomes of training on standard FLS (FLS) equipment with training on an ergonomically different (ED-FLS), but more portable, lower cost platform. METHODS: Subjects completed a pre-training FLS skills test on the standard platform and were then randomized to train on the FLS training platform (n = 20) or the ED-FLS platform (n = 19). A post-training FLS skills test was administered to both groups on the standard FLS platform. RESULTS: Group performance on the pretest was similar. Fifty percent of FLS and 32 % of ED-FLS subjects completed the entire curriculum. 100 % of subjects completing the curriculum achieved passing scores on the post-training test. There was no statistically discernible difference in scores on the final FLS exam (FLS 93.4, ED-FLS 93.3, p = 0.98) or training sessions required to complete the curriculum (FLS 7.4, ED-FLS 9.8, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that when applying mastery learning theory to an ergonomically different platform, skill transfer occurs at a high level and prepares subjects to pass the standard FLS skills test.

Impact of Connective Tissue Disease on Oncologic Breast Surgery and Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The impact of connective tissue disease (CTD) on outcomes following breast surgery and reconstruction is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of both CTDs and systemic immunomodulatory therapy on outcomes following breast surgery and reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients from 2005 to 2010 with an active CTD who underwent breast surgery with or without reconstruction. Surgical events were assigned to 1 of 4 groups: ablative surgery alone, autologous reconstruction, implant reconstruction, and revision surgery. Logistic regression was utilized to examine the relationship between complications and type of surgery, CTD diagnosis, and immunomodulatory therapy. Four non-CTD control groups were then compiled for outcome comparison. The a priori P-value was set at P < 0.05, and all tests were 2 sided. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with CTD underwent112 procedures. Diagnoses included psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (n = 12), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 10), lupus (n = 4), scleroderma (n = 3), Sjogren syndrome (n = 2), mixed CTD (n = 1), and seronegative polyarthritis (n = 1). Nineteen of 33 (58%) patients who received systemic treatment for CTD in the perioperative period were less likely to experience a minor complication compared with those without treatment (odds ratio= 0.69; P = 0.019). There were no differences in postoperative complications in patients with CTD compared with control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ablative breast surgery and reconstruction among patients with CTDs can be performed safely with low perioperative complication rates. Patients receiving systemic therapy, and continuing their regimens perioperatively, experience complication rates similar to those not requiring therapy.

Correlating patient-reported outcomes and ambulation success following microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction in comorbid patients.

INTRODUCTION: Microsurgical lower extremity flap reconstruction provides a valuable option for soft tissue reconstruction in comorbid patients. Limb salvage with flap reconstruction can result in limb length preservation. Despite this, few studies have examined the impact of salvage on patient-centered metrics in this cohort of patients. Therefore, we investigated quality of life and patient satisfaction following microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction in this high-risk patient population. Factors that resulted in improved patient-centered outcomes were also identified. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who had lower extremity free flap reconstruction (FFR) following lower extremity wounds. High-risk patients were identified as having multiple comorbidities and chronic wounds. Patients with traumatic wounds were excluded from analysis. Quality of life was evaluated with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) validated survey. Phone interviews were conducted for survey evaluations. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2010, 57 patients had lower extremity flap reconstruction that met the inclusion criteria. Average follow-up was 236.6 weeks (range, 111-461). Comorbidities included diabetes (36%), PVD (24.6%), and ESRD (7%). Limb length preservation and ambulation occurred in 82.5% (47/57). Revisional surgery occurred in 33.3% (19/57). Survey response rate was 63%. Average SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were 44.9 and 59.8 for patients able to achieve ambulation and 27.6 and 61.2 for nonambulatory patients. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical flap reconstruction is a valuable reconstructive option in high-risk patients. Quality of life is comparable with a normalized population if limb salvage is successful. Quality of life is decreased significantly when failure to ambulate occurs in this patient cohort.

Revisiting the scapular flap: applications in extremity coverage for our U.S. combat casualties.

BACKGROUND: Combat injuries commonly result in massive bony and soft-tissue destruction within the extremities. These extremity wounds often require large free tissue transfers and/or composite flaps for definitive reconstruction. In U.S. military war trauma experience, the authors' practice has found the scapular flap increasingly useful for reconstruction of complex extremity injuries. The purpose of this study is to report the authors' experience using the scapular flap in extremity reconstruction and evaluate the indications for use in the authors' patient population. METHODS: All consecutive limb salvage cases requiring free flaps from 2009 to 2012 at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center were reviewed retrospectively. Scapular flap cases were identified. Data collected included Injury Severity Score, flap characteristics, and complications. RESULTS: Twelve scapular free flaps were performed for extremity reconstruction for combat-related trauma, representing 16.2 percent of all microsurgical reconstructions during that period. Cases included eight traditional scapular flaps, two osteocutaneous scapular flaps, one chimeric latissimus/scapular flap, and one chimeric parascapular/scapular/scapula bone flap. The complication rate was 17 percent, consisting of one flap hematoma and one donor-site dehiscence. Complication rates were similar between scapular flaps, other fasciocutaneous flaps, and muscle flaps. CONCLUSIONS: In a decade of war trauma, the authors' practice has found the scapular flap useful for reconstruction of complex extremity injuries. This flap is uniquely suited to the authors' patients, given the severity of their injuries and rehabilitation needs. The scapular flap continues to have various indications in injuries seen within the authors' military population that may be applicable to the authors' civilian patient counterparts. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.