Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 184(12): 1608-12, 2001 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11740738

ABSTRACT

In a nonrandomized study of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), a cross-sectional evaluation of subjects who were the source of human immunodeficiency (HIV) exposure was performed to characterize partners of index subjects seeking nonoccupational PEP against HIV. Among 401 index subjects, 64 (16%) recruited a source subject. Those in a steady relationship and those who knew that the source subject was HIV antibody positive were more likely to recruit their source subject. Source subjects reported high rates of past (78%) and current (69%) antiretroviral use; 46% of those using antiretroviral drugs had detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. Antiretroviral resistance was detected in many source subjects who reported any use of antiretrovirals and was rare among source subjects who reported no history of antiretroviral use. Clinicians often make treatment decisions on the basis of incomplete knowledge of the source subject's HIV status or antiretroviral treatment history. The treatment history, particularly nonuse of a class of antiretroviral drugs, can be used to predict drug resistance.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Contact Tracing , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Sexual Behavior , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Female , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-1/immunology , Humans , Male , RNA, Viral/blood
2.
J Infect Dis ; 183(5): 707-14, 2001 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11181146

ABSTRACT

The feasibility of providing postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) after sexual or injection drug use exposures to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was evaluated. PEP was provided within 72 h to individuals with exposures from partners known to have or to be at risk for HIV infection. PEP consisted of 4 weeks of antiretroviral medications and individually tailored risk-reduction and medication-adherence counseling. Among 401 participants seeking PEP, sexual exposures were most common (94%; n=375). Among sexual exposures, receptive (40%) and insertive (27%) anal intercourse were the most common sexual acts. The median time from exposure to treatment was 33 h. Ninety-seven percent of participants were treated exclusively with dual reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and 78% completed the 4-week treatment. Six months after the exposure, no participant developed HIV antibodies, although a second PEP course for a subsequent exposure was provided to 12%. PEP, after nonoccupational HIV exposure, is feasible for persons at risk for HIV infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/prevention & control , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Contact Tracing , Counseling , Didanosine/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Nelfinavir/therapeutic use , Patient Compliance , Risk Factors , Risk-Taking , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/drug therapy , Time Factors , Zidovudine/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...