ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that the implementation of service guideline recommendations can significantly reduce the number of suicides in mental healthcare. Important barriers to suicide prevention guideline implementation are a lack of professionals' knowledge and competence towards the suicide prevention guideline.
AIM: To assess professionals' knowledge of, competence in, and adherence to the suicide prevention guideline in twelve Dutch specialist mental healthcare institutions.
METHOD: In this study, professionals working at crisis teams and outpatient care teams from each of the 12 participating mental healthcare institutions in the network of supranet Care were invited to fill in a questionnaire examining professionals' knowledge of, competence in, and adherence to the suicide prevention guideline (N = 400). Results were analyzed with multilevel regression analysis and adjusted for confounding.
RESULTS: Although professionals scored high on knowledge, competence, and adherence towards the guideline, they did not know to what extent the guideline was implemented within their own team. Outpatient care teams scored significantly lower on professionals' knowledge and reported lower levels of competence. Furthermore, we found significantly higher scores on adherence to the guideline for professionals in crisis teams compared to outpatient care teams. Healthcare professionals also reported practice variation within and across Dutch mental healthcare institutions. CONCLUSIONS Practice variation within and across teams and mental healthcare institutions is undesirable. To reduce this variation, professionals and mental healthcare institutions should share best-practices and learn from each other how the quality of care for suicidal patients can be optimized.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Suicide Prevention , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Suicidal Ideation , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Suicide is a major public health problem, and it remains unclear which processes link suicidal ideation and plans to the act of suicide. Growing evidence shows that the majority of suicidal patients diagnosed with major depression or bipolar disorder report repetitive suicide-related images and thoughts (suicidal intrusions). Various studies showed that vividness of negative as well as positive intrusive images may be reduced by dual task (e.g. eye movements) interventions taxing the working memory. We propose that a dual task intervention may also reduce frequency and intensity of suicidal imagery and may be crucial in preventing the transition from suicidal ideation and planning to actual suicidal behaviour. This study aims a) to evaluate the effectiveness of an Eye Movement Dual Task (EMDT) add-on intervention targeting suicidal imagery in depressed patients, b) to explore the role of potential moderators and mediators in explaining the effect of EMDT, and c) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EMDT. METHODS: We will conduct a multi-center randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the effects of EMDT in combination with usual care (n = 45) compared to usual care alone (n = 45). Participants will fill in multiple online batteries of self-report questionnaires as well as complete a semi-structured interview (Intrusion Interview), and online computer tasks. The primary outcome is the frequency and intrusiveness of suicidal imagery. Furthermore, the vividness, emotionality, and content of the suicidal intrusions are evaluated; secondary outcomes include: suicidal behaviour and suicidal ideation, severity of depression, psychological symptoms, rumination, and hopelessness. Finally, potential moderators and mediators are assessed. DISCUSSION: If proven effective, EMDT can be added to regular treatment to reduce the frequency and vividness of suicidal imagery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on October 17th, 2018 at the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre ( NTR7563 ).
