Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock despite a lack of evidence regarding its effect on mortality. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock for whom early revascularization was planned were randomly assigned to receive early ECLS plus usual medical treatment (ECLS group) or usual medical treatment alone (control group). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 30 days. Safety outcomes included bleeding, stroke, and peripheral vascular complications warranting interventional or surgical therapy. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients underwent randomization, and 417 patients were included in final analyses. At 30 days, death from any cause had occurred in 100 of 209 patients (47.8%) in the ECLS group and in 102 of 208 patients (49.0%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.19; P = 0.81). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 12) in the ECLS group and 5 days (interquartile range, 3 to 9) in the control group (median difference, 1 day; 95% CI, 0 to 2). The safety outcome consisting of moderate or severe bleeding occurred in 23.4% of the patients in the ECLS group and in 9.6% of those in the control group (relative risk, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.95); peripheral vascular complications warranting intervention occurred in 11.0% and 3.8%, respectively (relative risk, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31 to 6.25). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with planned early revascularization, the risk of death from any cause at the 30-day follow-up was not lower among the patients who received ECLS therapy than among those who received medical therapy alone. (Funded by the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation and others; ECLS-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03637205.).

Association between adverse effects under azathioprine therapy and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase activity in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) catalyzes the pyrophosphohydrolysis of inosine triphosphate to inosine monophosphate. Recently, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the ITPA gene, associated with decreased enzyme activity, have been reported. Some clinical studies have demonstrated that the 94C>A mutation is linked to flu-like symptoms, rash, and pancreatitis during azathioprine (AZA) therapy and to early AZA discontinuation. In this study, we investigated whether the enzyme phenotype is also related to adverse effects (AEs). METHODS: Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease who were treated with AZA (N=160; age 43±12 years) were included. Data were categorized into quartiles according to the ITPA activity. Information about the therapeutic regimen, AEs [leucopenia, increased hepatic enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase), flu-like symptoms, and pancreatitis], cotherapy, and comorbidity was obtained from the responsible clinicians and patients by using a standardized questionnaire. ITPA activity was measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography procedure. In patients with decreased ITPA activity, the 94C>A and IVS2+21A>C genotypes were determined. RESULTS: AEs were reported significantly more often for patients with low ITPA activity than for patients with high ITPA activity; the highest odds ratio for occurrence of AEs was found to be below a threshold of 59.9 µmol/(gHb·h) [hemoglobin (Hb)]. Decreased ITPA activities [particularly <89.2 µmol/(gHb·h)] were frequently accompanied by leucopenias, whereas very low enzyme activities [<37.3 µmol/(gHb·h)] were associated with a higher incidence of increased liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate a relationship between low ITPA activity and AEs and support the idea that the determination of ITPA phenotype might be an appropriate alternative to genotyping.