Project ECHO in Psychiatric Workforce Development: the Example of a Perinatal Mental Health ECHO.

OBJECTIVE: Perinatal mental health and substance use disorders (PMHSUD) often go unrecognized and untreated. This study examined the use of the Project ECHO model to teach obstetric, primary care, and mental health clinicians about screening, diagnosis, and treatment of PMHSUD. METHODS: Participants in 3 years of the University of Washington's Moms' Access Project (MAP) ECHO program (2019-2022) completed pre- and post-program surveys. Nine participants in year 1 completed qualitative interviews. Dedoose was used for qualitative analysis of interviews. RESULTS: Of 136 participants, 62.5% (15/24) completed both pre- and post-surveys in year 1, 56% (28/50) in year 2, and 32.2% (20/62) in year 3. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they were glad to have participated (96.8%; 60/62) and that they had used information learned in the program in treating a patient (95.1%; 58/61). In all years, respondents endorsed increased confidence regarding learning objectives of the program. Qualitative interviews following year 1 yielded themes of hierarchy of competence, motivation versus results of participation, connection, and politics of change: position and practice type. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported the feasibility, acceptability, and self-reported effectiveness of the ECHO model for workforce development in PMHSUD.

Health care costs related to home spirometry in the eICE randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Home spirometry with regular symptom assessment is one strategy to track lung health to intervene early in episodes of pulmonary exacerbations (PE). In a multi-center randomized controlled trial home spirometry and symptom tracking demonstrated no significant differences regarding the primary clinical endpoint, FEV1, compared to usual care, but did identify differences in healthcare utilization. We used data from the Early Intervention in Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbation (eICE) study to evaluate whether home monitoring of PE is a cost-minimizing intervention in the context of this randomized trial. METHODS: We reviewed healthcare resource utilization of all 267 eICE participants, including outpatient visits, antibiotics and hospitalizations. Prices were identified in the IBM/Watson MarketScanⓇ Commercial Claims and Encounters Databases and averaged over the 2014-2017 period. Using total healthcare utilization costs, we generated summary statistics by intervention and protocol arm (total cost, mean cost, standard deviation). We performed Welch Two Sample t-tests to determine if total costs and cost by type of utilization differed significantly between groups. RESULTS: Outpatient visit costs were significantly higher by 13% in the Early Intervention (EI) than in the usual care (UC) arm ($3,345 vs. $2,966). We found no significant differences in outpatient antibiotic, hospitalization, or total health care costs between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of the eICE trial, outpatient visits were significantly higher in those with experimental home spirometry care, but that did not translate into statistically significant differences of overall health care costs between the two arms.