Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun ; 77(Pt 2): 83-85, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33614130

ABSTRACT

The structure of the title compound, C29H26N4O6, exhibits a folded conformation with the three arms all on the same side of the tertiary N atom. The two phthalimide units make a dihedral angle of 12.18 (12)° and the dihedral angles between the benzyl plane and the phthalimide units are 68.08 (7) and 67.71 (7)°. The crystal packing features π-π inter-actions.

3.
Am J Surg ; 214(6): 1075-1079, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28939251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We compared endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for managing choledocholithiasis found at time of cholecystectomy. METHODS: One hundred and five LCBDE (2005-2015) were compared to 195 LC/ERCP (2014-2015) from the Southern California Kaiser Permanente database. RESULTS: LC/ERCP was more effective at clearing the CBD (98% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.01); but required more procedures per patient (mean ± standard deviation, 1.1 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.12, p < 0.001). Morbidity, hospital length of stay and readmission were not different (P > 0.05). Four patients failed ERCP, while 12 patients failed LCBDE and had subsequent ERCP (10) or CBD exploration (2). All patients with RYGB had successful LCBDE. CONCLUSION: LC/ERCP is better than LCBDE in clearing CBD stones, but has similar morbidity and is an effective alternative for patients with RYGB.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Choledocholithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Laparoscopy , California , Common Bile Duct/surgery , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Am J Surg ; 212(6): 1121-1125, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27871681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines exist for postoperative antibiotic use in acute appendicitis that is perforated, gangrenous, or simple/uncomplicated, there are less data about its use in suppurative appendicitis. Here, we targeted this subgroup of patients to determine whether postoperative antibiotic administration affects incidence of intra-abdominal abscess formation. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 1,192 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis at Kaiser Permanente Fontana Hospital between August 2010 and August 2013. Suppurative appendicitis was described for 143 (12%) patients. Fifty-two patients received postoperative antibiotics for at least 1 week on discharge home, 91 did not. RESULTS: Of 143 patients with suppurative appendicitis, 1 (1.9%) who received postoperative antibiotics came back with an intra-abdominal abscess within 1 month. Of the 91 patients in the no antibiotic group, 1 (1.1%) came back with an intra-abdominal abscess. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of postoperative antibiotic in the setting of suppurative appendicitis has no effect on the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation. Routine postoperative antibiotics may not be necessary in this patient population, and more evidence is needed to justify its use.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Postoperative Care , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Appendicitis/pathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Laparoscopy , Male , Retrospective Studies , Suppuration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...