Shared decision-making in routine breast cancer care in Germany-A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Many preference-sensitive decisions have to be made in breast cancer care and little is known about the decision-making processes between breast cancer patients and the different health care professionals engaged in their treatment. METHODS: All female breast cancer patients who underwent surgery in four German breast centers between 07/2016 and 12/2018 were invited to fill in a survey. The decision-making process was evaluated using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and a German measure to assess satisfaction with care (ZAPA). The higher the total score (0-100), the higher the experienced degree of participation and satisfaction, respectively. Participants were asked to separately rate consultations with their inpatient hospital doctors, outpatient gynecologists, outpatient oncologists and primary care providers. An overall mean score for the degree of participation and the satisfaction with care was calculated for each patient across all consultations assessed. Differences between the 4 treating physician groups were analyzed as well. RESULTS: Of 1068 approached patients, 563 with a mean age of 62 and a standard deviation (SD) of 12.2 years filled in the survey (response rate: 53%). The overall SDM-Q-9 score was 73.8 (SD: 20.8). Older patients stated a higher level of participation than younger, different physician groups were rated quite similarly. Overall satisfaction with care was 87.4 (SD: 15.5). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients reported to have experienced a high level of shared decision-making (SDM) and were quite satisfied with their treatment. However, we do not know whether non-responders might have had different experiences.

Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Some countries have implemented stand-alone human papillomavirus (HPV) testing while others consider cotesting for cervical cancer screening. We compared both strategies within a population-based study. METHODS: The MARZY cohort study was conducted in Germany. Randomly selected women from population registries aged ≥30 years (n = 5,275) were invited to screening with Pap smear, liquid-based cytology (LBC, ThinPrep), and HPV testing (Hybrid Capture2, HC2). Screen-positive participants [ASC-US+ or high-risk HC2 (hrHC2)] and a random 5% sample of screen-negatives were referred to colposcopy. Post hoc HPV genotyping was conducted by GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA with reverse line blotting. Sensitivity, specificity (adjusted for verification bias), and potential harms, including number of colposcopies needed to detect 1 precancerous lesion (NNC), were calculated. RESULTS: In 2,627 screened women, cytological sensitivities (Pap, LBC: 47%) were lower than HC2 (95%) and PCR (79%) for CIN2+. Cotesting demonstrated higher sensitivities (HC2 cotesting: 99%; PCR cotesting: 84%), but at the cost of lower specificities (92%-95%) compared with HPV stand-alone (HC2: 95%; PCR: 94%) and cytology (97% or 99%). Cotesting versus HPV stand-alone showed equivalent relative sensitivity [HC2: 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.21; PCR: 1.07, 95% CI, 1.00-1.27]. Relative specificity of Pap cotesting with either HPV test was inferior to stand-alone HPV. LBC cotesting demonstrated equivalent specificity (both tests: 0.99, 95% CI, 0.99-1.00). NNC was highest for Pap cotesting. CONCLUSIONS: Cotesting offers no benefit in detection over stand-alone HPV testing, resulting in more false positive results and colposcopy referrals. IMPACT: HPV stand-alone screening offers a better balance of benefits and harms than cotesting.See related commentary by Wentzensen and Clarke, p. 432.

Modification of human platelet adhesion on biomaterial surfaces by protein preadsorption under static and flow conditions.

Biomaterial-induced thrombosis remains one of the main complications of vascular implant devices. Preadsorbed proteins on the biomaterial/blood interface will modify the adhesion and activation of platelets (PTLs) during the initial contact-phase. Our results clearly show that PTL-adherence on biomaterials is influenced not only by protein preadsorption, but also by flow conditions. The covalent coating of TCPS and glass by phosphorylcholine (PC) induces a significant decrease of PTL adhesion but leads to a slight, but nevertheless significant activation of PTL, which was detected by the induction of P-selectin expression using FACS analysis. Methodologically, the visualization of PTL adhesion gave more reliable results for measurement of PTL adhesion than the cell-enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for P-selectin. Human citrated plasma caused an inhibition of PTL. It is probable, that the contained sodium citrate may inhibit PTL adhesion by its calcium ion-binding capacity. The flow experiment as dynamic system is in our view absolutely essential for the evaluation of biomaterials for vascular prosthesis, and is in accordance with the international standards. The results of the experiments also suggest that investigations under static and flow conditions are needed to determine the influence of protein adsorption on mixed blood cell populations, for example, on PTL and PMN mixtures/co-cultures in order to achieve a better simulation of the in vivo situation.

Nuclear expression of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease increases with progression of ovarian carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE alias Ref-1) is a key enzyme in the base excision repair pathway. Besides its function in DNA repair, APE serves to maintain several transcription factors in an active reduced state such as c-Fos, c-Jun, NF-kappaB, p53 and HIF-1alpha, all of which have been shown to play a role in tumorigenesis. Because of the importance of APE in maintaining genomic stability and gene regulation, we examined whether APE expression is associated with survival and histopathological parameters of patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Tissue sections of primary epithelial ovarian carcinomas from 141 patients were immunostained using a monoclonal antibody directed against APE. RESULTS: Nuclear expression of APE was clearly associated with progression of ovarian carcinomas. Patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III and IV showed a higher nuclear APE expression level than patients with FIGO stages I and II (P < 0.0001). Similarly, nuclear APE expression was associated with histological grading (grade 1 vs. 2 vs. 3; P = 0.025). In contrast, cytoplasmic and stromal APE expression were not associated with progression. The fraction of APE-positive nuclei (P = 0.0185), the intensity of nuclear staining (P = 0.0496) and a combination of both (P = 0.0070) were associated with survival of ovarian cancer patients, as evidenced by a univariable proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariable analysis, adjusted to FIGO stage, histological grade and type as well as residual tumor after surgery showed that APE is not independent from "classical" prognostic factors of ovarian cancer. An unexpected observation was the inverse correlation between nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of APE. Tumors with strong cytoplasmic APE reactivity showed a higher fraction of APE-negative nuclei than tumors with weak or negative cytoplasmic APE expression (P = 0.045). This suggests that nuclear translocation of APE is impaired during ovarian carcinogenesis. In conclusion, we have shown that nuclear APE expression increases during tumor progression. This suggests that increased base excision repair capacity and/or APE-mediated activation of transcription factors may contribute to more aggressive proliferation of ovarian carcinomas.