ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) followed by Radiotherapy (RT) (RFA-RT) produces better palliation in terms of pain than RT alone in patients with osteolytic bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with solitary bone metastases and a pain score of least 5 or more on the VAS scale were selected. Fifteen patients were treated with RFA-RT (20 Gy delivered in 5 fractions of 4 Gy over 1 week) and were compared with a matched group (30 subjects) treated by RT. RESULTS: A complete response in terms of pain relief at 12 weeks was documented in 16.6% (5/30) and 53.3% (8/15) of the subjects treated by RT or RFA-RT, respectively (p = 0.027). The overall response rate at 12 weeks was 93.3% (14 patients) in the group treated by RFA-RT and 59.9% (18 patients) in the group treated by RT (p = 0.048). Although recurrent pain was documented more frequently after RT (26.6%) than after RFA-RT (6.7%) the difference did not reach statistical significance. The morbidity related to RT did not significantly differ when this treatment was associated with RFA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that RFA-RT is safe and more effective than RT. The findings described here should serve as a framework around which to design future clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Palliative Care , Radiotherapy/methods , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Confidence Intervals , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Osteolysis/radiotherapy , Osteolysis/surgery , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Pain, Intractable/radiotherapy , Pain, Intractable/surgery , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival AnalysisSubject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Catheter Ablation , Osteolysis/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , PrognosisABSTRACT
The hypothesis being tested in this study is that hypofractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and not lower in terms of oncological outcome than conventional radiotherapy. Forty patients with histologically proven glottic cancer were included in the analysis. Twenty-two were treated by hypofractionated radiotherapy (3D-HFRT) (25 fractions of 2.4 Gy delivered daily to a total dose of 60 Gy). This group was retrospectively compared to 18 subjects who met the same inclusion criteria and who were treated with conventional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) (33 fractions of 2 Gy delivered daily to a total dose of 66 Gy). One year after RT treatment in 10 patients (5 in the arm-1 and 5 in the arm-2) mild dysphonia persisted. The other patients achieved a complete recovery of the overall quality of voice with no significant difference documented between the two groups. At 3 years the local control rate was 100% for the patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy and 96% for the patients treated with conventional regimen. The statistical analysis did not show any significant difference in local control between the two groups (p=0.45). No significant acute and late toxicity was documented in both groups. Subjects with early glottic cancer seem to experience comparable levels of morbidity irrespective whether they were treated by hypofractionated or conventional conformal therapy without any worsening of the tumor local control. Thus, we provide clinical evidence to justify trends already emerging toward hypofractionated regimens in early glottic cancer.
Subject(s)
Dysphonia/etiology , Glottis/pathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Vocal Cords/radiation effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Glottis/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vocal Cords/physiopathology , Voice Quality/radiation effectsABSTRACT
To value the late genitourinary (GU) morbidity in men treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen for prostate cancer. Patients with intermediate risk factors according to D'Amico's criteria were selected. The hypofractionated schedule consisted of 15 fractions of 3.63 Gy delivered three times per week for a total dose of 54.3 Gy. Significant changes in storage-symptoms were not found. A significant transient worsening in the score of late effects of normal tissue late effects normal tissue task force (LENT)-subjective, objective, management, analytic (SOMA) urinary-function domain was observed at 12 months with subsequent improvement at 28 months. The assessment of voiding-symptoms and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) showed that no significant difference was measurable at 12 and 28 months. For PVR, a transient increase at 12 months with a subsequent decrease at 28 months was measured. No significant increase in alpha-blockers usage and in the percentage of men with pathological nonintubated uroflowmetry (NIF) was observed at 12 and 28 months. Finally, patients did not perceive any clinical worsening in their quality of life (QoL) as attested by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)-QoL. Our study seems to suggest that our hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule for the treatment of prostate cancer is safe in terms of late urinary morbidity. Further study will be required to confirm our results.
