Dose-ranging trial with a recombinant urokinase (urokinase alfa) for occluded central venous catheters in oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Recombinant urokinase (r-UK) is a high-molecular-weight urokinase produced in transfected, non-human, mammalian cells. A Phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of one or two instillations of three intraluminal concentrations of r-UK (5,000; 15,000; and 25,000 IU/mL) with a placebo for reestablishment of total function to occluded central venous access devices (CVADs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred eight patients with CVAD withdrawal or total occlusion were enrolled and randomized to treatment; 104 patients received at least one instillation of study drug and 101 patients completed treatment. All but one patient had cancer. RESULTS: All three concentrations of r-UK were significantly superior to placebo in restoring total CVAD function (patency of all occluded lumens) after one or two instillations of study medication (25,000 IU/mL r-UK, 68% vs. placebo, 28% [P =.007]; 15,000 IU/mL r-UK, 69% vs. placebo, 24% [P =.004]; 5,000 IU/mL r-UK, 70% vs. placebo, 28% [P =.003]). Comparisons of the three r-UK concentrations indicated no difference after one or two instillations with regards to patency restoration. Treatment-emergent hemorrhagic events occurring within 72 hours after study drug exposure were experienced by four patients (17%) in the 25,000 IU/mL r-UK group, two patients (7%) in the 15,000 IU/mL r-UK group, no patients in the 5,000 IU/mL r-UK group, and no patients in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety results of this study support further evaluation of a 5,000 IU/mL concentration of r-UK for treatment of occluded CVADs in adult and pediatric patients from 1 year of age.

The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of an alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with a poor pathologic response to a preoperative doxorubicin-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer received three cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VACP) every 21 days followed by surgery. Patients with less than 1 cm(3) residual tumor at mastectomy received an additional five cycles of VACP. Those with more than 1 cm(3) residual tumor were randomly assigned to receive an additional five cycles of VACP or five cycles of vinblastine, methotrexate with calcium leucovorin rescue, and fluorouracil (VbMF). RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were evaluable. Overall clinical response was seen in 83.4% after three cycles of VACP, whereas the pathologic complete response was 12.2%. One hundred six patients were randomly assigned to VACP or VbMF. Those receiving VbMF achieved higher relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those who received additional VACP, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. Initial stage of tumor, clinical complete response, and pathologic complete response were all associated with statistically superior survival rates. CONCLUSION: Clinical and pathologic response to preoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy predicted for improved survival in women with operable breast cancer. For those with a poor response to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy, treatment with VbMF was associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS compared with those continuing with the doxorubicin regimen.

Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease.

We conducted a single-institution study to determine whether local therapy plus six cycles of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) followed by 5 years of tamoxifen is superior to local treatment alone in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease (stage IV-NED breast cancer). Patients with breast cancer were eligible if they had histologic proof of a locoregional or distant recurrence that had been curatively resected, irradiated, or both and had no other evidence of disease. Patients who had received prior anthracycline therapy were not eligible. All patients received six cycles of intravenous FAC, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. After completion of chemotherapy, patients whose tumors had not previously demonstrated resistance to tamoxifen and had positive or unknown estrogen receptor status received tamoxifen 20 mg by mouth daily for 5 years. Patients in this study were compared with a historical control population (patients with stage IV-NED breast cancer who never received systemic therapy) as well as with the patients in two previously reported trials of chemotherapy for stage IV-NED disease. Forty-seven patients were registered, but only 45 were evaluable. There was a highly statistically significant difference ( p < 0.001) in OS and DFS among the four groups, with patients in our most recent study having the best OS and DFS at 3 years compared with the control group (84% vs. 55% and 66% vs. 11%, respectively). When patients in all four groups were analyzed together in search of prognostic factors, we found that patients whose primary tumors had negative axillary lymph nodes had a statistically significant improvement in OS and DFS ( p < 0.01) compared with patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. No survival differences were found between patients with positive and those with negative hormone receptor status. This study demonstrates a benefit in terms of OS and DFS for patients with stage IV-NED breast cancer who receive doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The benefit was greater on patients with node-negative primary tumors. In patients with stage IV-NED disease, doxorubicin-based chemotherapy should be considered standard treatment after adequate local control is achieved.