A multi-gene panel beyond BRCA1/BRCA2 to identify new breast cancer-predisposing mutations by a picodroplet PCR followed by a next-generation sequencing strategy: a pilot study.

By analyzing multiple gene panels, next-generation sequencing is more effective than conventional procedures in identifying disease-related mutations that are useful for clinical decision-making. Here, we aimed to test the efficacy of an 84 genes customized-panel in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative patients. Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this study. DNA libraries were prepared using a picodroplet PCR-based approach and sequenced with the MiSeq System. Highly putative pathogenic mutations were identified in genes other than the commonly tested BRCA1/2: 2 pathogenic mutations one in TP53 and one in MUTYH; 2 missense variants in MSH6 and ATM, respectively; 2 frameshift variants in KLLN, and ATAD2, respectively; an intronic variant in ANPEP, and 3 not functionally known variants (a frameshift variant in ATM a nonsense variant in ATM and a missense variant in NFE2L2). Our results show that this molecular screening will increase diagnostic sensitivity leading to a better risk assessment in breast cancer patients and their families. This strategy could also reveal genes that have a higher penetrance for breast and ovarian cancers by matching gene mutation with familial and clinical data, thereby increasing information about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetics and improving cancer prevention measures or therapeutic approaches.

Simultaneous PET/MRI assessment of response to cytotoxic and hormone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a preliminary report.

The aim of this study was to assess the response to cytotoxic and hormone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in four patients with locally advanced breast cancer by simultaneous PET/MRI. Four patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent simultaneous PET/MRI of the breast using a 3 T Biograph mMR before and after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (two patients were treated with hormone-therapy and two patients were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy). Morpho-structural tumoral features and tumor size were assessed; area value, metabolic (SUV and MTV) and functional (ADC, K trans, V e, k ep and iAUC) data were obtained by positioning regions of interest. A comparison of all parameters between the pre- and post-treatment PET/MRI examinations and between the two different therapeutic schedules was assessed. In patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and classified as PR, there was a significant reduction of post-treatment morphological, metabolic and functional parameters. In a patient treated with hormone therapy, classified as SD, there was an increase of all post-treatment perfusion parameters, a substantially stable ADC value and a poor reduction of lesion size and of maximum SUV (SUVmax) values; the last patient, treated with hormone therapy and classified as PR, showed a significant reduction of lesion size and SUVmax values with a reduction of perfusion parameters and substantially stable ADC values. Multiparametric evaluation with simultaneous PET/MRI could be a useful tool to assess the response to cytotoxic and hormone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Future studies in a larger cohort of patients are warranted to confirm the results of this preliminary study.

Body mass index and treatment outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in women aged 45 y or younger: Evidence from a historic cohort.

PURPOSE: Large and consistent evidence supports the role of body mass index (BMI) as a prognostic and predictive indicator in breast cancer. However, there is paucity of data specifically referred to women diagnosed at a young age across the different disease settings. We investigated the impact of BMI on treatment outcomes in 86 breast cancer patients aged 45 y or less treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) followed by surgery. METHODS: Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as the eradication of cancer from both breast and lymph nodes. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Curves were compared by long rank test for significance. Potential predictors of survival were tested in Cox models. RESULTS: We observed a pCR in 19 patients (22%). Lower values of BMI were more commonly associated with pCR (p = 0.05). Results from univariate, but not multivariate, models were somewhat supportive of higher pCR rates in leaner women (p = 0.06). None of the variables impacted DFS. OS was longer in leaner patients (medians and 95%CI: 74.6 months, 66.2-82.9 and 58.5 months, 49.6-67.4, p = 0.009). Longer OS was also related to lower T-stage, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and non triple negative (TN) subtype (p = 0.046, p = 0.024, and p = 0.015, respectively). Cox models confirmed the protective role of lower BMI (Hazard Ratios: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.12-0.71, p = 0.007), non TN subtype and adjuvant RT (p = 0.008 and p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In young breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CT followed by surgery, lower values of BMI are associated with longer OS. Our data also showed longer OS in association with a non TN molecular subtype and adjuvant RT. The modifiable nature of BMI and aggressive biologic behavior of the disease diagnosed at a young age encourage further studies to corroborate our findings.

Triple negative breast cancer: looking for the missing link between biology and treatments.

The so called "Triple Negative Breast Cancer" (TNBC) represents approximately 15-20% of breast cancers. This acronym simply means that the tumour does not express oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and does not exhibit amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene. Despite this unambiguous definition, TNBCs are an heterogeneous group of tumours with just one common clinical feature: a distinctly aggressive nature with higher rates of relapse and shorter overall survival in the metastatic setting compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. Because of the absence of well-defined molecular targets, cytotoxic chemotherapy is currently the only treatment option for TNBC. In the last decades, the use of more aggressive chemotherapy has produced a clear improvement of the prognosis in women with TNBC, but this approach results in an unacceptable deterioration in the quality of life, also if some support therapies try to relieve patients from distress. In addition, there is the general belief that it is impossible to further improve the prognosis of TNBC patients with chemotherapy alone. In view of that, there is a feverish search for new "clever drugs" able both to rescue chemo-resistant, and to reduce the burden of chemotherapy in chemo-responsive TNBC patients. A major obstacle to identifying actionable targets in TNBC is the vast disease heterogeneity both inter-tumour and intra-tumour and years of study have failed to demonstrate a single unifying alteration that is targetable in TNBC. TNBC is considered the subtype that best benefits from the neoadjuvant model, since the strong correlation between pathological Complete Response and long-term Disease-Free-Survival in these patients. In this review, we discuss the recent discoveries that have furthered our understanding of TNBC, with a focus on the subtyping of TNBC. We also explore the implications of these discoveries for future treatments and highlight the need for a completely different type of clinical trials.

Metabolic syndrome-breast cancer link varies by intrinsic molecular subtype.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer. Existing data suggest that the strength of metabolic syndrome-breast cancer link varies by intrinsic molecular subtype, but results from worldwide literature are controversial. Primary endpoint of the study was to assess whether MS is a predictor of specific breast cancer (BC) subtype. Secondary endpoint was to determine whether components of MS can individually increase the risk of specific breast cancer subtype. METHODS: Anthropometric and metabolic variables were correlated to breast cancer specific subgroups, retrospectively. Statistical significance was considered when p ≤ 0.05 and 95% CI. RESULTS: Data analysis suggests that MS per se represents a modifiable risk factor for BC in postmenopausal [OR 6.28 (95% CI 2.79-14.11) p < 0.00001]. MS per se prevalence is higher among Luminal breast cancers in postmenopausal [OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.07-2.80) p = 0.03]. Body Mass Index (BMI) alone is associated to Luminal A subtype breast cancer risk [OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.96-2.196 p = 0.2]. Waist Circumference > 88 cm has been shown to be specifically and statistically significant associated to HER-2+ breast cancer subtypes in postmenopausal [OR 2.72 (95% CI 1.69- 10.72) p = 0.01], whilst in Luminal B it was only marginally statistical associated [OR 2.21 (95% CI 0.77-2.60) p = 0.1]. Insulin resistance showed statistical significant association to HER-2+ and Luminal B tumors [OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.66-6.69) p = 0.05] and [OR 2.33 (95% CI 1.2-4.2) p = 0.006], respectively. Hence, it has emerged that BMI is weakly associated to Luminal A breast cancers in this case series, whereas visceral obesity and insulin resistance are likely to be linked to more aggressive breast cancer subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: New molecular biomarkers unveiling metabolic syndrome related breast carcinogenesis need to be detected to further stratify breast cancer risk by subtypes.

Combination of inositol and alpha lipoic acid in metabolic syndrome-affected women: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inositol has been reported to improve insulin sensitivity since it works as a second messenger achieving insulin-like effects on metabolic enzymes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inositol and alpha lipoic acid combination effectiveness on metabolic syndrome features in postmenopausal women at risk of breast cancer. METHODS: A six-month prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial was carried out on a total of 155 postmenopausal women affected by metabolic syndrome at risk of breast cancer, the INOSIDEX trial. All women were asked to follow a low-calorie diet and were assigned randomly to daily consumption of a combination of inositol and alpha lipoic acid (77 pts) or placebo (78 pts) for six months. Primary outcomes we wanted to achieve were both reduction of more than 20% of the HOMA-IR index and of triglycerides serum levels. Secondary outcomes expected were both the improvement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and the reduction of anthropometric features such as body mass index and waist-hip ratio. RESULTS: A significant HOMA-IR reduction of more than 20% was evidenced in 66.7% (P <0.0001) of patients, associated with a serum insulin level decrease in 89.3% (P <0.0000). A decrease in triglycerides was evidenced in 43.2% of patients consuming the supplement (P <0.0001). An increase in HDL cholesterol (48.6%) was found in the group consuming inositol with respect to the placebo group. A reduction in waist circumference and waist-hip ratio was found in the treated group with respect to the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Inositol combined with alpha lipoic acid can be used as a dietary supplement in insulin-resistant patients in order to increase their insulin sensitiveness. Daily consumption of inositol combined with alpha lipoic acid has a significant bearing on metabolic syndrome. As metabolic syndrome is considered a modifiable risk factor of breast tumorigenesis, further studies are required to assess whether inositol combined with alpha lipoic acid can be administered as a dietary supplement in breast cancer primary prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trial ISRCTN74096908.

The dynamic optical breast imaging in the preoperative workflow of women with suspicious or malignant breast lesions: development of a new comprehensive score.

Purpose. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DOBIComfortScan in patients with Breast Imaging Reporting suspect breast lesions (BI-RADS) 4-5 breast lesions. Materials and Methods. One-hundred and thirteen patients underwent DOBIComfortScan examination before surgery. Twelve parameters were taken into consideration to define DOBI findings. Results. Twenty-seven radical mastectomies, 47 quadrantectomies and 39 wide excisions, were performed. Overall, 65 invasive cancer, 9 in situ carcinoma and 39 nonmalignant lesions, were observed. Ten out of 12 considered parameters resulted significantly in association with histology at discriminant analysis. A summation score of 30.5 resulted to be the best cut off at ROC analysis, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 87%, respectively, and a positive predictive value of 92.2%. Finally the following DOBI-BI-RADS model was developed: malignant B5 ≥ 38 score); possibly malignant (B4 = 25 - 37 score); benign but the possibility of malignancy cannot be excluded (B3 = 20 - 24 score); benign (B2 < 20 score). Conclusion. definition of other parameters permits to improve the accuracy of this procedure. Further studies are warranted to define the potential role of DOBIComfortScan in breast cancer imaging.

Metabolic syndrome affects breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: National Cancer Institute of Naples experience.

Postmenopausal women show the highest incidence of breast cancer in the female population and are often affected by metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome (MS)--characterized by central adiposity, insulin resistance, low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), high serum triglyceride and high blood pressure--seems to be strictly correlated to breast carcinogenesis. We enrolled 777 healthy women and women with breast cancer in our nested case-control study to evaluate the association between MS and breast cancer, analyzing anthropometric parameters (weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumference), blood pressure, serum HDL-C, triglyceride, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, testosterone and uric acid levels and administering a questionnaire about physical activity, food intake, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, personal and familial history of disease. We found an higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome (30%) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients compared to healthy women (19%). None of the individual MS features was strong enough to be considered responsible for breast carcinogenesis alone. However, of the 63 postmenopausal breast cancer cases associated to MS, 30% presented three or more MS features, suggesting that the activation of multiple molecular pathways underlying MS might contribute to tumorigenesis. Our data support the hypothesis that MS may be an indicator of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. The unsettlement of the hormonal arrangement in postmenopausal, along with an increase in visceral adiposity, probably favour the hormone-dependent cell proliferation, which drives tumorigenesis. Adjustments in lifestyle with physical activity intensification and healthy diet could represent modifiable factors for the primary prevention of sporadic breast cancer.

Women survive breast cancer but fall victim to heart failure: the shadows and lights of targeted therapy.

In many cases, early-stage breast cancer is now curable, and metastatic disease can be chronic consequent to the advent of new therapeutic tools. Unfortunately, some treatments have been associated with adverse cardiovascular effects. Indeed, in many breast cancer survivors, the risk of cardiovascular disease is higher than the risk of cancer recurrence. The clinical challenge of preventing cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment has two aims, more effective life-saving treatment of patients, and prevention of morbidity and cardiovascular mortality in the short term and long term. The aim of the present study is to review the rapidly evolving therapeutic strategies designed to treat early-stage breast cancer. The review highlights the need for more data on the impact of new biological drugs (targeted therapy) on the cardiovascular apparatus. Finally, given the complexity of targeted and other novel treatments, cancer patients are best managed through a multidisciplinary approach.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination in young and elderly patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. A retrospective analysis of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group trials.

We retrospectively assessed tolerability and efficacy of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination in 259 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in three randomized SICOG trials according to their age (70 years) at study entry. Apart from age, demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. Response rate of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was similar in younger and in elderly (36% versus 30%). Chemotherapy was well tolerated, but severe neutropenia (12% versus 7%), anaemia (6.6% versus 1.8%), and vomiting (5% versus 0) were more frequent in elderly patients. Both median progression-free survival (PFS, 5.5 months versus 4.2 months), and overall survival (OS, 11.1 months versus 9.1 months) resulted slightly prolonged for younger patients. However, only stage and performance status resulted independently affecting PFS and OS. In conclusion, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine were similarly tolerated and active in younger and elderly patients. This regimen should be considered an option for the management of fit elderly patients.

Weekly dose-dense cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel administration with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support does not substantially improve prognosis in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. A SICOG phase II study.

PURPOSE: The present study was aimed at defining the antitumor activity of the cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly administration with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in chemonaive small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease (ED-SCLC). METHODS: Chemonaive ED-SCLC patients received cisplatin 30 mg/sqm, epirubicin 50 mg/sqm and paclitaxel 120 mg/sqm, weekly, with G-CSF (5 microg/kg from day 3 to 5) support, for a maximum of 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were treated, for a total of 354 cycles delivered. Eight complete (21%), and 22 partial responses (56%) were recorded, giving a 77% (95% CI = 61-89%) objective response rate (ORR). After 14 (range, 7-28)-month median follow-up, 24 deaths have occurred. Median progression-free and overall survival were 7 months and 11 months, with 1- and 2-year projected survivals of 45 and 24%, respectively. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 (10%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. Only one case of neutropenic sepsis was recorded, while hemorrhagic thrombocytopenia was never observed. Emesis, loss of appetite, mucositis and fatigue were the main nonhematological toxicities, being severe in 9, 8, 4 and 7 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly PET combination with G-CSF support represents an active therapeutic approach in chemonaive ED-SCLC patients. However, both ORR and median survival does not seem substantially better than those achievable with a standard regimen. In view of that, and in consideration of the relevant nonhematological toxicity, this approach should not be pursued outside clinical trials.

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan treatment with filgrastim support is highly active in antracycline-Paclitaxel-refractory breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and activity of combination treatment with docetaxel (DTX) and irinotecan (CPT-11), given together every other week, combined with filgrastim support, in anthracycline- and paclitaxel-pretreated breast cancer (BC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced BC patients pretreated with anthracycline- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible. DTX (80 mg/m2) and CPT-11 (100 mg/m2) were given biweekly with filgrastim support (300 microg/day on days 4-7). RESULTS: Fifty patients (48 with metastatic and 2 with locally advanced cancer) were enrolled, with a total of 318 cycles being delivered. Thirty-one patients had visceral localizations. All patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, as front-line treatment for advanced disease. Overall, fatigue and diarrhea were the main chemotherapy-related toxicities in this study, being severe in 10 (20%) and 4 (8%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 (36%) and 6 (12%) patients, respectively. Red blood cell transfusions were required in 4 patients. A total of 32 objective responses were registered (overall response rate, ORR = 64%, 95% confidence interval = 49-77%), including 8 complete responses (16%). An additional 8 patients showed stable disease. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 4-29) months, 30 patients were still alive, and 19 were progression free; median progression-free and overall survivals were 10 and 23 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly DTX/CPT-11 with G-CSF support is a well-tolerated and highly effective approach in anthracycline-/paclitaxel-pretreated patients. The very promising ORR and survival outcome observed in this subset of patients with a poor prognosis suggest that this regimen might play a major role in the management of this disease.

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan with filgrastim support in pretreated breast and non-small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DTX) has been shown to be a very active drug in both breast cancer (BC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Irinotecan (CPT-11) is also active in NSCLC, and has shown promising antitumor activity in pretreated BC. PURPOSE. To define the MTDs of these two drugs given together every other week with the use of filgrastim support in pretreated BC and NSCLC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (aged 18-70 years, performance status < or =2) with advanced NSCLC or BC who had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were candidates for this phase I study. The starting DTX and CPT-11 doses were 60 mg/m(2) and 80 mg/m(2). Doses were alternately escalated at each step by 10 mg/m(2) for both drugs. Filgrastim 300 microg/day was given subcutaneously from days 4 through 7 of each cycle. RESULTS: From April 2000, 41 patients were included in the trial (27 BC, 14 NSCLC). All BC patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel (with or without cisplatin) as first-line treatment. Of the 14 NSCLC patients, 12 had received cisplatin-based first-line therapy, and 8 patients had been pretreated with paclitaxel. The dose escalation proceeded through five dose levels up to DTX and CPT-11 doses of 80 mg/m(2) and 100 mg/m(2), respectively. Overall, ten patients showed dose-limiting toxicity during the first cycle, diarrhea in seven and neutropenia in the remaining three. Considering all 218 cycles delivered, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (34%), with only one episode of neutropenic fever, while severe diarrhea was observed in 9 patients (23%). A total of 21 objective responses were registered (four complete) for an overall response rate of 51% [95% CI 35-67]. A major response was seen in 16 of the 27 BC patients (59%) and in 5 of the 14 NSCLC patients (36%). CONCLUSIONS: DTX and CPT-11 can be safely given together biweekly at adequate doses, with filgrastim support. In view of the promising activity data in both groups, phase II studies testing this combination in pretreated BC and NSCLC patients are ongoing.

Treatment of breast cancer with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim: approaches to improving therapeutic outcome.

Chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer, and its benefit is directly related to the percentage of the planned dose that is actually administered. In all current chemotherapeutic regimens, a substantial proportion of patients have reductions and/or delays in dosage due to side effects. In about half such cases, the delays or reductions are related to neutropenia. Overall, approximately 30% of patients have a reduction to less than 85% of the planned dosage. Women aged > or = 50 years are more likely to experience a reduction or delay in dose. Dose-intense regimens (excluding myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy) which increase the dose of chemotherapy or reduce the interval between cycles, or both, are a promising approach now under investigation. The human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor filgrastim reduces the incidence of neutropenia and facilitates adherence to full dose intensity in both standard and dose-intensified regimens. A model based on the first-cycle absolute neutrophil count nadir has been developed and validated to determine which patients should receive filgrastim. A cost benefit associated with the use of filgrastim in patients with breast cancer has been realised. This may lead to a re-evaluation of the current treatment guidelines.

Chemotherapy of lung cancer in the elderly.

In the last few years it has become evident that the elderly lung cancer patient represents a peculiar individual with regard to both the tolerance to the tumor and its treatment. Age per se cannot be considered an adverse prognostic factor, however, the physiologic impairment of the functions of important organs like liver, kidney, bone marrow etc., may render more unpredictable the treatment-related toxicity, and moreover, the higher incidence of concomitant diseases which occurs with aging certainly translates in a worse survival outcome. As a consequence, a careful multidimensional evaluation (functional, emotional, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, etc.) should be preliminarily performed in patients eligible for chemotherapy treatment. Several approaches have been tested in elderly lung cancer patients. Different therapeutic attitudes exist, which first take into account the kind of histology (small cell lung cancer, SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC). Of course a more aggressive approach can be sometimes justified in an elderly SCLC patient in view of the high responsiveness of this disease, while more concerns exist about the use of aggressive chemotherapy regimen in elderly patients with NSCLC histology. In view of these considerations, more clinical trials are being planned to specifically assess the role of chemotherapy in this subset of patients.A brief review of the most important phase II and III trials conducted in elderly patients with either SCLC or NSCLC is provided here. A description of the most important still unsolved issues will be made, and an outline of the ongoing clinical trials in these patients will be provided.

A phase I-II study on a gemcitabine-cyclophosphamide-fluorouracil/folinic acid triplet combination in anthracycline- and taxane-refractory breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To define the cyclophosphamide (CTX) maximal tolerated dose when combined with fixed doses of gemcitabine, fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (leucovorin, LFA) in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. METHODS: Metastatic breast cancer patients aged < or = 75 years, with ECOG performance status 0-2, were eligible, provided that they had received previous anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for the advanced disease. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), 5-FU 425 mg/m(2), LFA 100 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of CTX, starting from 500 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The dose escalation was stopped if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in > 33% of patients of a given cohort. After the definition of DLT, a further escalation with the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; on days 3-5 and 10-12) was planned. RESULTS: Since March 1999, 69 patients have entered this trial through seven different cohorts. The dose escalation was stopped at the CTX dose of 600 mg/m(2) since 3/6 patients showed DLT. A further dose escalation was attempted in the presence of G-CSF support. A CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2) proved to be safe and was chosen for the phase II. A total of 33 patients were treated at this dose level. The treatment was fairly well tolerated, grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 38 and 16% of patients, respectively. No cases of sepsis or bleeding were registered. Four patients required a packed red blood cell transfusion. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was also uncommon, occurring in 10 patients. Three complete and 24 partial responses were recorded for an overall response rate of 38% (95% CI = 26-50). Two complete and 12 partial responses were recorded in the 33 patients treated in the phase II for an overall response rate (ORR) of 42% (95% CI = 25-61). CONCLUSIONS: The gemcitabine-CTX-5-FU/LFA combination is a well-tolerated treatment for poor-prognosis breast cancer patients with previous exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes. With the addition of G-CSF, a cumulative CTX dose of 1,600 mg/m(2) can be safely delivered every 3 weeks. The evidence of an ORR approaching 40% is very promising and justifies further evaluations in this subset of patients.