Comparison of telemetric and tail-cuff blood pressure monitoring in adrenocorticotrophic hormone-treated rats.

1. The aim of the present study was to validate a telemetric blood pressure (BP) monitoring system against tail-cuff blood pressure in both adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)- and sham-treated rats. In the statistical analyses, we first tested whether there was a detectable effect on systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 10 days treatment with ACTH compared with saline. Second, we compared results of telemetered and tail-cuff measurements and, third, we developed a novel method for estimating the relative power of the two techniques. 2. Twenty-three male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups: (i) ACTH (100 microg/kg per day, s.c; n = 12) treated; or (ii) sham treated (0.9% saline, s.c; n = 11). Systolic BP was measured by the telemetric system (sampled for 10 s every 2 min) continuously for 4 h (n = 16) or for 30 min (n = 23) and also by the indirect tail-cuff method daily (n = 23). Data were compared within and between groups; ordinary least products (OLP) regression analysis was then performed to test for bias between the two methods. Sample size/power estimations were also performed. 3. Adrenocorticotrophic hormone treatment raised telemetered SBP by 11 mmHg (P < 0.001) compared with 14 mmHg (P < 0.001) using the tail-cuff method. There was no fixed or proportional bias between the two methods of measurement, as shown by regression analysis. Power calculations indicate that a minimum sample size of six gives a power of telemetered to tail-cuff of 0.84/0.86 = 0.98. The power of 4 h versus 30 min BP measurements was 0.99/0.82 = 1.2. 4. Telemetry gave very similar results to the tail-cuff method. Telemetry allows for a longer period of measurement, giving greater power to the study so that fewer animals are needed.

Circadian blood pressure variability in adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension in the rat.

OBJECTIVES: Secondary hypertension is often characterized by loss of diurnal blood pressure variability. This study examined circadian (24 h) blood pressure variability in adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH)-induced hypertension in the Sprague-Dawley rat. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated to sham (0.9% saline, s.c.), n = (9), ACTH (0.5 microg/kg per day, s.c., n = 8) or ACTH (100 microg/kg per day, s.c., n = 7) in a room with a 12 h light/dark cycle (0600 h to 1800 h). A radio telemetry transducer was used to measure blood pressure in unrestrained animals over 3 control days (C1-C3) and 10 treatment days (T1-T10). Heart rate, systolic (SBP), mean arterial (MAP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were continuously recorded. Body weight was measured daily and serum corticosterone concentration ([B]) prior to death. RESULTS: Sham treatment had no effect on any parameters. ACTH 100 microg/kg per day increased SBP from 124+/-2 pooled control (PC) to 134+/-2 mmHg (T10), MAP from 105+/-2 to 115+/-2 mmHg and DBP from 87+/-1 to 99+/-2 mmHg and decreased heart rate from 305+/-6 to 249+/-5 beats/min and body weight from 299+/-6 (C3) to 280+/-8 g (T10) (all P' < 0.0036). Serum [B] was higher in ACTH- (881+/-44 ng/ml) than sham-treated rats (384+/-17 ng/ml, P < 0.001). There were no differences between sham treatment and ACTH 0.5 microg/kg per day. SBP, MAP, DBP and heart rate were consistently higher for ACTH 100 microg/kg per day and sham-treated animals during the dark cycle (1800 h to 0600 h) than the light cycle (0600 h to 1800 h). CONCLUSIONS: ACTH 100 microg/kg per day raises blood pressure in conscious unrestrained Sprague-Dawley rats without any change in normal diurnal rhythm.

Vasopressin V1a receptor antagonism does not reverse adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension in the rat.

1. The role of arginine vasopressin (AVP) was examined in adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH)-induced hypertension in Sprague-Dawley rats using the non-peptide AVP V1a receptor antagonist OPC 21268. 2. In an acute study, six rats were pretreated with ACTH for 11 days and direct arterial blood pressure (4 h), plasma osmolality and electrolyte concentrations were measured after OPC 21268 gavage. In a chronic study, 40 rats were randomly divided into four groups: (i) sham injection + sham gavage; (ii) ACTH + sham gavage; (iii) sham injection + OPC 21268; or (iv) ACTH + OPC-21268 for 16 days. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), water intake, urine volume (UV), urine osmolality and electrolytes, food intake, bodyweight and plasma osmolality and electrolyte concentrations were measured. 3. In the acute study, direct mean arterial blood pressure did not change with OPC 21268 (122+/-2 and 120+/-3 mmHg at 0 and 240 min, respectively). 4. In the chronic study, OPC 21268 did not affect ACTH-induced rises in blood pressure (from 125+/-2 (control) to 145+/-5 mmHg (group 4) compared with 122+/-3 (control) to 149+/-5 mmHg (group2)). Water intake and UV increased (from 29+/-2 to 83+/-6 mL/day; and from 5+/-1 to 36+/-5 mL/day, respectively) and the change in bodyweight decreased from 0+/-2 to -107+/-7 g. 5. These results suggest that AVP (at the V1a receptor) does not play a significant role in the maintenance of ACTH-induced hypertension.

The role of corticosterone in corticotrophin (ACTH)-induced hypertension in the rat.

OBJECTIVE: Corticotrophin (ACTH)-induced hypertension in the rat is prevented by L- but not D-arginine. We examined the effects of exogenous corticosterone in the male Sprague Dawley (SD) rat to determine whether ACTH-induced hypertension is mediated by corticosterone. METHODS: Exogenous corticosterone (10, 20 or 40 mg/kg per day) or sham (polyethylene glycol (PEG) 1 ml/kg per day) was injected subcutaneously in divided doses (s/c b.d.) over 15 treatment days to 40 SD rats (n = 10 each group). Subsequently, the effects of L-arginine, D-arginine or L-arginine + N-nitro-L-arginine (NOLA) on corticosterone-induced hypertension (corticosterone 20 mg/kg per day) were examined. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and metabolic parameters were measured every two days. RESULTS: Twenty and 40 mg/kg per day of corticosterone increased SBP compared with sham (P< 0.01, P< 0.05 respectively, sham versus respective group). Forty mg/kg per day of corticosterone raised serum corticosterone concentration compared with sham (502 +/- 20 versus 364 +/- 25 ng/ml, P < 0.001). L-arginine prevented the rise in SBP produced by corticosterone (131 +/- 3 to 131 +/- 2 mmHg, control versus day 10) but D-arginine did not (129 +/- 3 to 142 +/- 4 mmHg on day 8, P < 0.01). NOLA blocked the effect of L-arginine and amplified the rise in blood pressure produced by corticosterone (130 +/- 3 to 171 +/- 6 mmHg on day 10, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The haemodynamic features of ACTH-induced hypertension were reproduced by corticosterone excess, at concentrations of corticosterone similar to those in studies of exogenous ACTH administration. It is likely that ACTH-stimulated adrenal production of corticosterone accounts for the features of ACTH-induced hypertension in the rat

The role of the parathyroid glands in adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension in the rat.

The aim of this study was to determine whether parathyroidectomy (PTx) would modify hypertension secondary to adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) administration. Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly assigned to one of five groups; (i) sham (saline) treatment (NaCl 0.9% s/c 0.5 ml/kg/day), (ii) ACTH treatment (Synacthen Depot 0.5 mg/kg/day), (iii) saline/PTx/1% CaCl2 in water, (iv) ACTH/PTx/1% CaCl2 in water and (v) ACTH/1% CaCl2 in water. Tail cuff systolic blood pressure (SBP) and metabolic parameters were measured on alternate days for 4 control (C) and 11 treatment days (T0-T10). There was no change in SBP in the sham and saline/PTx/CaCl2 groups over T0-10. SBP increased in the ACTH treated groups. PTx did not modify ACTH-induced increases in SBP or metabolic effects. These results do not support a role for the parathyroids in the genesis of ACTH-induced hypertension in the rat.

Adrenocorticotrophic hormone-induced hypertension in the rat: effects of the endothelin antagonist bosentan.

1. The effects of the endothelin antagonist bosentan on adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-induced hypertension were examined in the conscious male Sprague-Dawley rat. 2. In order to confirm endothelin antagonism, 18 rats were randomly divided into two groups: receiving either (i) endothelin-1 (0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 nmol/kg, i.v.); or (ii) endothelin-1 at these doses following bosentan (100 mg/kg gavage) and mean arterial pressure recorded (study A). Subsequently, 40 male rats (320 +/- 5 g) were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10): (i) Sham (0.9% saline, s.c.) + 5% acacia gum gavage; (ii) ACTH (500 micrograms/kg per day, s.c.) + 5% acacia gum gavage; (iii) Sham injection + bosentan (100 mg/kg per day) gavage; or (iv) ACTH + bosentan. Six control days (C1-C6) were followed by 11 treatment days (T0-T10). Systolic blood pressure, water intake, urine volume, food intake and bodyweight were measured every second day (study B). 3. Bosentan significantly attenuated the endothelin-1-induced blood pressure rise at 0.125 nmol/kg (P < 0.05), but not at higher doses. 4. Bosentan at a dose which attenuated endothelin-1-induced blood pressure increase had no effect on either blood pressure or metabolic parameters in ACTH-treated rats. 5. These results suggest that endothelin does not play a major role in ACTH-induced hypertension.

Adrenocorticotrophin dose-response relationships in the rat: haemodynamic, metabolic and hormonal effects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine adrenocorticotrophin dose-response relationships for increase of blood pressure and metabolic parameters of the Sprague-Dawley rat. METHODS: We injected 120 male Sprague-Dawley rats twice daily subcutaneously for 10 days with 0.5, 1, 5, 50, 100, 200 or 500 microg/kg synthetic adrenocorticotrophin per day (all n = 10) or subjected them to sham injection (0.9% NaCl; n = 50). Systolic blood pressure, 24 h food intake, water intake, urine volume and body weight were measured. Data from a further 45 rats treated with 500 microg/kg per day adrenocorticotrophin in previous studies were included in the blood pressure analyses. After we had killed these rats, their organ weights (kidney, heart, adrenal) and plasma electrolyte, adrenocorticotrophin and serum corticosterone concentrations were measured. RESULTS: On the final day of treatment systolic blood pressure of sham-injection control rats was 123 +/- 1 mmHg (n = 50). Compared with sham treatment, a low dose of adrenocorticotrophin (1 microg/kg per day) increased systolic blood pressure from 122 +/- 1 to 130 +/- 2 mmHg (P < 0.001) without any metabolic effects, whereas a high dose of adrenocorticotrophin (500 microg/kg per day) increased systolic blood pressure from 121 +/- 1 to 150 +/- 2 mmHg (P < 0.001, n = 55) with increases in intake of water and urine volume (P < 0.001, n = 10) and a decrease in body weight (P < 0.001, n = 10). Plasma adrenocorticotrophin and serum corticosterone concentrations for the sham-injection control group were 162 +/- 12 pg/ml (36 +/- 3 pmol/l) and 376 +/- 18 ng/ml (1038 +/- 50 nmol/l), respectively. Plasma adrenocorticotrophin concentration was elevated by injections of 100 (P < 0.05), 200 (P < 0.01) and 500 microg/kg adrenocorticotrophin per day (P = 0.001). Serum corticosterone concentration was not significantly different from that of sham-injection rats with 0.5-5 microg/kg adrenocorticotrophin per day but was increased by injection of 50-500 microg/kg adrenocorticotrophin per day (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results define 1 microg/kg adrenocorticotrophin per day, administered subcutaneously, as the threshold dose for causing a rise in blood pressure in the rat Thus administration of adrenocorticotrophin increases systolic blood pressure at doses that induce minimal adrenocorticotrophin metabolic effects. Administration of a low dose of adrenocorticotrophin to the rat is a suitable model for stress-induced hypertension.