Parathyroid Allotransplantation: Report of Outcomes in 3 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypoparathyroidism is a relatively rare endocrine disorder defined as inadequate parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion leading to a clinical syndrome characterized by hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia. This condition has high morbidity; patients present with a heterogeneous range of emotional, mental, and physical symptoms. We present our experience with PTH transplantation, using parathyroid glands surgically removed in the setting of secondary hyperparathyroidism, with a description of the clinical course, immunosuppressive management, and surgical technique. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, 3 patients underwent parathyroid allotransplantation at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The 2 outcomes of interest were (1) symptomatic relief and improvement in calcium levels and (2) time to graft failure, defined as the presence of undetectable PTH levels. RESULTS: All 3 patients experienced dramatic improvement in their debilitating symptoms, even though 2 patients required repeated PTH transplantation procedures. One patient had a remarkable course with symptom resolution, normalization of PTH levels, and a great reduction in calcium supplementation. CONCLUSION: The use of hyperplastic glands from patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing 4-gland parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation represents an important source. However, a uniform definition of graft viability and prospective studies with long follow-ups are needed to address how much parathyroid tissue is optimally transplanted and the need for immunosuppression. Most patients affected by hypoparathyroidism are successfully managed by medical treatment; however, some do not respond to therapy and present debilitating symptoms related to hypocalcemia. This subgroup may benefit from parathyroid allotransplantation. Our 3 patients had remarkable improvement in their symptoms with the adoption of hyperplastic glands. Two out of 3 patients required multiple procedures to sustain symptom control.

Obesity and Kidney Transplantation-How to Evaluate, What to Do, and Outcomes.

Obesity is a growing issue that is spreading worldwide; its prevalence is ever increasing in patients with end-stage renal disease and represents a potential barrier to transplantation. The lack of unanimous guidelines exacerbates the current disparity in treatment, which can affect outcomes, leading to a significantly longer time on the waiting list. Multidisciplinary and multimodal management (encompassing several healthcare professionals such as nephrologists, transplant physicians and surgeons, primary care providers, and nurses) is of paramount importance for the optimal management of this patient population in a continuum from waitlisting to transplantation. Development of this guideline followed a standardized protocol for evidence review. In this review, we report on our clinical experience in transplantation of obese patients; strategies to manage this condition, including bariatric surgery, suitable timing for transplantation among this patient population, and clinical experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy; and simultaneous robotic kidney transplantation to achieve optimal outcomes.

Desensitizing With Temporary Donor Splenic Transplant: Hope for the Sensitized Patients on Pancreas and Kidney -Pancreas Transplant Waitlist.

BACKGROUND: Sensitized patients on a waitlist with donor specific antibodies (DSA) or positive flow cytometry cross match (FXM) to deceased donor organ have few pretransplant desensitization options due to increasing graft cold ischemia time. Herein, sensitized simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients received temporary splenic transplant from the same donor under the hypothesis that spleen would function as a DSA graveyard and provide a safe immunologic window for transplant. METHODS: We analyzed presplenic and postsplenic transplant FXM and DSA results of 8 sensitized patients who underwent simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation with temporary deceased donor spleen between November 2020 and January 2022. RESULTS: Pre-splenic transplant, 4 sensitized patients were both T-cell and B-cell FXM positive; one was only B-cell FXM positive and 3 were DSA positive/FXM negative. Post-splenic transplant, all were FXM negative. Pre-splenic transplant class I and class II DSA were detected in 3 patients, only class I DSA in 4 patients, and only class II DSA in 1 patient. Postsplenic transplant, class I DSA was eliminated in all patients. Class II DSA persisted in 3 patients; all showed a marked decrease in DSA mean fluorescence index. Class II DSA was eliminated in one patient. CONCLUSION: Donor spleen functions as a DSA graveyard and provides an immunologically safe window for kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Corrigendum: Donor Size Doesn't Impact En Bloc Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience and Review of Literature.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10731.].

Donor Size Doesn't Impact En Bloc Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience and Review of Literature.

Few transplant programs use kidneys from donors with body weight (BW)<10 kg due to higher incidence of vascular and urological complications, and DGF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the non-inferiority of pediatric en bloc kidneys from donors with BW<10 kg. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of en bloc kidney transplants from pediatric donor cohort (n = 46) from 2003 to 2021 and stratified the outcomes by donor BW (small group, donor BW<10 kg, n = 30; standard group, donor BW<10 kg, n = 16). Graft function, rate of early post-transplant complications, graft and patient survival were analyzed. Complication rates were similar between both groups with 1 case of arterial thrombosis in the smaller group. Overall graft and patient survival rates were similar between the small and the standard group (graft survival-90% vs. 100%, p = 0.09; patient survival-96.7 vs. 100%, p = 0.48). Serum creatinine at 1, 3, 5 years was no different between groups. Reoperation rate was higher in the small group (23.3% vs. 6.25%, p = 0.03). The allograft from small donors could be related to higher reoperation rate in the early post-transplant period, but not associated with lower long-term graft and patient survival.

Lasting Over Time: 20-Year Follow-Up of Living Related Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Between Identical Twins.

BACKGROUND: Twenty-year follow-up of the first reported simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant from living donor between identical twins. CASE: We present a case of a patient after the world's first simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant between identical twins. The transplant was performed because of diabetes mellitus type (DM1) related renal failure. Now in her sixties, the patient has had exceptional prolonged bi-graft function without immunosuppression. She is free from DM1 recurrence, does not take insulin, and her creatinine level has stayed with the normal limit. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant can be performed successfully with excellent long-term outcomes.

Case report: Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for focal congenital hyperinsulinism in a 5-month-old baby.

Background: In focal congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI), surgery is the gold standard of treatment, even for lesions localized in the head of the pancreas. We report the video of the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy performed in a five-month-old child with focal CHI. Operative technique: Baby was placed in the supine position with both arms outstretched to the up. After transverse supraumbilical incision and mobilization of ascending and transverse colon, exploration and multiple biopsies of the tail and the body of the pancreas ruled out multifocality. Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy was performed according to the following steps: extended Kocher maneuver, followed by retrograde cholecystectomy and common bile duct isolation; division of the gastroduodenal artery and of the gastrocolic ligament; division of the duodenum, Treitz ligament and jejunum; transection of the pancreatic body. The reconstructive time was with: pancreato-jejunostomy; hepaticojejunostomy; pilorus-preserving antecolic duodeno-jejunostomy. The anastomoses were accomplished with synthetic absorbable monofilament sutures; two drains were placed close to the biliary and pancreatic anastomoses and to the intestinal anastomosis, respectively. Total operative time was 6 h, with no blood loss and/or intra-operative complications, immediate normalization of blood glucose levels and discharge from surgical ward 19 days after surgery. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of medical unresponsive focal forms of CHI is feasible in very small children: it is mandatory to refer the baby to a high-volume centre for a multidisciplinary management involving hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgeons and experts in metabolic disease.