Recovery efficiencies of anthrax spores and ricin from nonporous or nonabsorbent and porous or absorbent surfaces by a variety of sampling methods*.

The 2001 anthrax letter cases brought into focus the need to establish the most effective environmental sampling procedures. Results are presented from two studies aimed at establishing the best procedures for everyday surfaces likely to be contaminated after the release of environmentally stable bioaggressive agents, as exemplified by anthrax spores and ricin. With anthrax spores, contact plates, with mean retrieval rates of 28-54%, performed better than other methods by a wide margin for flat nonporous, nonabsorbent surfaces. They also proved best on flat porous, absorbent materials, although recoveries were low (<7%). For both agents, dry devices (swabs, wipes, Trace Evidence Collection Filters) had universally poor retrieval efficiencies with no significant differences between them. Among moistened devices (wipes, swabs, and Sample Collection and Recovery Devices), wipes were generally best, albeit with considerable cross-over among individual readings (highest mean recoveries for anthrax spores and ricin 5.5% and 2.5%, respectively, off plastic).

Heat activation/shock temperatures for Bacillus anthracis spores and the issue of spore plate counts versus true numbers of spores.

Assessing true numbers of viable anthrax spores is complex. Optimal heat activation conditions vary with species, media and germinants. Published time/temperature combinations for Bacillus anthracis spores range from 60 degrees C for 1, post-heating counts were less than their pre-heating counterparts on between 71% and 88% of occasions. A high probability was found of viable spore counts differing significantly from counts determined microscopically, with differences of almost 1 log possible. Viable counts were lower than microscopic counts in 15 of 18 tests.