International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners global position on the use of biosimilars in cancer treatment and supportive care.

With the development of innovative cancer treatments over recent decades, the cost of cancer care has risen exponentially, limiting patient access to patented originator biotherapeutics in many countries. The introduction of biosimilars to the market has created new opportunities as well the need for changes in practice within healthcare institutions. A 'biosimilar' is a biotherapeutic product which is highly similar in terms of quality, safety and efficacy to an already licensed originator product. Although biosimilars lack clinically meaningful differences in therapeutic activity as compared to the originator product, these complex biological molecules are not considered identical chemical copies, unlike generics, and minor differences in molecular structure and inactive compounds may exist. A thorough understanding of these differences and their clinical implications is necessary for optimising medicines-use practices involving biosimilars. This position statement, developed by the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners Biosimilars Taskforce, aims to provide the global oncology pharmacy community with guidance to support decisions around biosimilar use. The 11 statements cover the regulation and evaluation of biosimilars, practical issues around local implementation, the education of healthcare staff and patients, and the requirement for ongoing pharmacovigilance and outcome monitoring.

Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: The fluoropyrimidines, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine, are commonly used chemotherapeutic agents that have been associated with coronary vasospasm. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, we identified patients at our institution who received 5-FU or capecitabine in 2018. We compared characteristics of patients who experienced cardiotoxicity with controls. We described phenotypes and outcomes of cardiotoxic cases. RESULTS: We identified 177 patients who received fluoropyrimidines. After adjudication, 4.5% of the cohort met the criteria for cardiovascular toxicity. Coronary artery disease was more common among cases than controls (38% vs. 7%, p < .05). There was also a trend toward increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in cases compared with controls. Most cardiotoxic cases had chest pain, although a minority of cases presented with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSION: Cardiotoxicity phenotypes associated with fluoropyrimidine use are not limited to coronary vasospasm. Cardiac risk factors and ischemic heart disease were highly prevalent among patients with cardiotoxicity.