Reporting and representation of race/ethnicity in published randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Although adequate representation of specific subgroups (eg, women and the elderly) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has been under intense scrutiny, there are few data on representation by race. METHODS: Using all RCTs cited by the 2007 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women (although trials were included whether or not there were female participants), we explored the extent to which information on race was reported in the baseline characteristics. Race/ethnicity categories were whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and "others." RESULTS: Overall, 156 trials were analyzed. Demographic data on race/ethnicity were reported in 55 (35%) trials and increased significantly over time (1970s, 12.5%; 1980s, 25%; 1990s, 30.5%; 2000s, 46.2%; P for trend = .011). Among the 55 trials reporting any race/ethnicity information, trial inclusion of whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and "others" was reported in 27%, 13%, 14%, 5%, and 10% of trials, respectively, and increased over time (P for trend < .05 for all). Trials enrolling subjects only in the United States or globally, including the US, were more likely to report race composition than trials that included no US sites (US only 64% vs global 62% vs non-US 21%, P < .01). Industry- and federal/foundation-funded RCTs reported race with similar frequency (industry 36% vs federal 34% vs both 24%, P = .44). When we isolated our analyses to trials that were funded by the National Institutes of Health, 12 (67%) of 18 RCTs reported race/ethnicity as a baseline characteristic. CONCLUSION: Although reporting the race/ethnic composition of study populations is increasing over time, two thirds of all RCTs supporting a recent American Heart Association () guideline failed to publish any information on race. A necessary first requirement in translating RCT evidence to patients of all races is information regarding racial demographics. Such information should be strongly encouraged in future publications.

Closing the gap: treating hypertension in women.

Hypertension is a common and readily modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Despite extensive clinical trial results and efforts to increase public awareness, it remains inadequately controlled in the general population. Women are particularly vulnerable. Recent data indicate both a growing prevalence of hypertension, particularly in the postmenopausal and African American populations, and significantly lower rates of adequate blood pressure control relative to men. Patient sex has an important influence on the nature of the disease, its management, and outcomes. This review will focus on sex-specific factors that contribute to hypertension in women, and current patterns and efficacy of treatment. In addition, we will highlight evidence-based options for antihypertensive treatment in women.

Associations of gender and etiology with outcomes in heart failure with systolic dysfunction: a pooled analysis of 5 randomized control trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to explore the gender-related differences in etiology and outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF) patients from 5 randomized trials. BACKGROUND: Each year, 550,000 new cases of HF are identified; however, there remain limited data on gender-related differences in etiology and outcomes among patients with HF with systolic dysfunction. METHODS: We analyzed data from 8,791 men and 2,851 women randomized in 5 clinical trials (PRAISE [Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation], PRAISE-2, MERIT-HF [Metoprolol Extended Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure], VEST [Vesnarinone Trial], and PROMISE [Prospective Randomized Milrinone Survival Evaluation]) to explore gender-related differences in etiology (ischemic vs. nonischemic) and outcomes (all-cause mortality and death or all-cause hospitalization). Hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated by gender and etiology. RESULTS: A total of 18% of ischemic and 31% of nonischemic patients were women. Irrespective of etiology, women were older, more ethnically diverse, and had higher systolic blood pressures, more diabetes, and severe HF symptoms, but less often smoked or had prior myocardial infarctions than men. Mean ejection fractions were similar between women (23.6%) and men (23.2%). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates varied by gender and etiology (female nonischemics, HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.85 to 0.89]; female ischemics, HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.81 to 0.85]; male nonischemics, HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.83 to 0.85]; male ischemics, HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.78 to 0.81]). After adjustment, female gender (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.85]) and nonischemic etiology (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.89]) were associated with longer survival time. Time to death or hospitalization was longer among nonischemics (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.78 to 0.89], p < 0.0001); however, female gender was not significantly associated with the composite outcome (HR 1.01 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.08]). CONCLUSIONS: Our data clarify that outcomes differ by both gender and etiology among patients with HF with systolic dysfunction. Understanding these differences may lead to better management of HF patients and improved overall prognosis.

Prevalence and management of hypertension in acute coronary syndrome patients varies by sex: observations from the Sibrafiban versus aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from ischemic Heart events postacute cOroNary sYndromes (SYMPHONY) randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension affects 1 billion individuals worldwide and is an independent risk factor for death after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS: We examined the prevalence and medical treatment of hypertension among 15,904 ACS patients randomized in the SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY trials. Analyses were performed overall and according to sex for the United States and across international practice. Multivariable models identified factors associated with use of antihypertensive medication classes and examined the association of hypertension and sex with mortality. RESULTS: In the United States, hypertension was more prevalent in women than in men, overall (63% vs 50%) and within every decile of age. Hypertensive women more often received calcium-channel blockers (35% vs 30%) and diuretics (33% vs 19%) and less often received beta-blockers (51% vs 57%). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use was similar (35% vs 34%). Women received multiple agents more frequently than did men: 2 agents, 35% vs 30%; > or = 3 agents, 16% vs 13%. Female sex independently predicted drug-class use only for diuretics. Mortality was higher in hypertensive women than in hypertensive men; after multivariable adjustment, mortality was similar without evidence of a differential association between hypertension and mortality according to sex. Although there was international variation in the use of individual classes of agents, the overall findings by sex were similar across regions. CONCLUSION: Hypertension is more prevalent in women than in men with ACS, and its medical management varies by sex, but its association with mortality is similar. Opportunities exist to improve medical therapy and outcomes in women with hypertension.