Reducing Time to Postintubation Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inadequate postintubation sedation (PIS) can lead to unplanned extubations, conscious paralysis, and overall unsafe care of patients. From 2018 to 2020, we realized at our hospital that ∼25% of children received sedation in an adequate time frame in the pediatric emergency department, with 2 unplanned dislodgements of the endotracheal tube. Our objective was to reduce time to initiating PIS from a mean of 39 minutes to less than 15 minutes in our pediatric emergency department by September 2021. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was formed in March 2020 to develop a key driver diagram and a protocol to standardize PIS. Baseline data were obtained from December 2017 through March 2020. The primary measure was time from intubation to administration of first sedation medication. Plan-do-study-act cycles informed interventions for protocol development, awareness, education, order set development, and PIS checklist. The secondary measure was unplanned extubations and the balancing measure was PIS-related hypotension requiring pressors. An X-bar and S chart were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Protocol implementation was associated with decrease in mean time to PIS from 39 minutes to 21 minutes. Following educational interventions, order set implementation, and the addition of PIS plan to the intubation checklist, there was a decrease in mean time to PIS to 13 minutes, which was sustained for 9 months without any observed episodes of PIS-related hypotension or unplanned extubations. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement methodology led to a sustained reduction in time to initiation of PIS in a pediatric emergency department.

Croup associated with COVID-19: A case series.

Background: Croup encounters substantially decreased when the pandemic first began, specifically between March and September 2020, before croup cases dramatically spiked again with the Omicron variant. There is a dearth of information concerning children at risk for severe or refractory COVID-19-associated croup and their outcomes. Objective: The objective of this case series was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of croup associated with the Omicron variant in children, with a focus on cases refractory to treatment. Methods: The case series includes children from birth to 18 years old who presented to a freestanding children's hospital emergency department in the Southeastern United States between December 1, 2021 and January 31, 2022 with a diagnosis of croup and a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes. Results: Of the total 81 patient encounters, 59 patients (72.8%) were discharged from the ED, with one patient requiring two revisits to the hospital. Nineteen patients (23.5%) were admitted to the hospital, and three of these patients represented to the hospital after discharge from the hospital. Three patients (3.7%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, none of whom represented after discharge. Conclusions: This study reveals a wide age range of presentation as well as a relatively higher rate of admission and fewer coinfections compared to pre-pandemic croup. Reassuringly, the results also show a low postadmission intervention rate as well as a low revisit rate. We discuss four refractory cases to highlight nuances for management and disposition decisions.

Designing and Conducting Scholarly Quality Improvement: A Practical Guide for Improvers Everywhere.

Successful publication of quality improvement (QI) work is predicated on the use of established QI frameworks and rigorous analytical methods that allow teams to understand the impact of interventions over time. This article is meant to help QI teams disseminate their work more broadly through publication by providing tangible methods that many journals desire in QI articles with specific examples of published works referenced throughout the article. We introduce improvement frameworks that teams should identify early and use as a foundation throughout their projects. We review vital aspects of QI projects, such as team formation, creation of a succinct and clear aim statement, defining primary, process, and balancing measures, as well as QI tools like key driver diagrams, Ishikawa (fishbone) diagrams, and Pareto charts. Finally, we highlight the importance of analyzing data over time to understand the impacts of plan-do-study-act cycles on data. Annotated run charts or, more preferably, annotated statistical process control (or Shewhart) charts are both statistically sound methods to identify significant changes over time. Deliberate planning and execution of QI projects using these concepts will lead to improved chances of QI teams finding success in their project and eventual article acceptance.

Pediatric emergency department to primary care transfer protocol: Transforming access for patients' needs.

BACKGROUND: Previous interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) overutilization from non-urgent visits have shown little success. At our hospital, we created an ED to primary care clinic (PCC) transfer protocol for non-urgent ED visits of established patients. Our study analyzed the impact of this protocol on patient encounters. METHODS: Chart reviews were conducted for a retrospective cohort of transfers from the ED to PCC from 9/01/17-8/31/18. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), cost, and need for return to the ED. Cost savings were calculated by comparing encounters with identical primary diagnoses in the ED with internal technical and professional financial data. Secondary outcomes were final diagnoses and primary care services provided. RESULTS: 374 patient encounters were transferred from ED to PCC. The five most common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection (n=80, 21.4%), dermatologic diagnoses (n=37, 9.9%), acute otitis media (n=35, 9.4%), pharyngitis (n=34, 9.1%), and influenza (n=34, 9.1%). Overall, total cost savings equaled approximately $100,000. For the top 10 diagnoses, costs were reduced from $29-$46 per $100 of ED costs and LOS was reduced by a mean of 49 min/encounter. For 9 of these 10 conditions, costs exceeded reimbursement in both settings; however, evaluation in PCC versus ED reduced the loss of revenue by 10-68%. Sixty-four encounters (17.1%) received additional primary care services. There were no safety events or inappropriate transfers. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol provided a safe, efficient method for patients to be evaluated in their medical home while reducing non-urgent emergency visits in the ED. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VI.

It Pays to be Accurate: Improving Critical Care Documentation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Clinician documentation is highly variable, and awareness of documentation requirements remains low despite post-training experience. At our hospital, critical care (CC) documentation was inconsistent. Our aim was to increase appropriate CC attestations from 51% to 90% for status asthmaticus, anaphylaxis, and diabetic ketoacidosis in the pediatric emergency department by December 2021. METHODS: A physician team developed a key driver diagram. Retrospective baseline data using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes were obtained from January 2018 to September 2020, after which data were followed prospectively in consecutive groups of 20 encounters. Statistical process control charts were used to analyze data. Nelson rules were used to detect special cause variation. Primary outcome was the inclusion of appropriate CC attestations. Interventions included education, CC attestation templates, and provider feedback. We also tracked charges for the 3 diagnoses studied. Process measures included template use. Balancing measure was refusal of payment by insurers. RESULTS: P-charts were used to analyze primary outcome and process measures. X-bar charts were used to analyze charges. Baseline data represented 706 encounters with 51% including CC documentation. Following clinician education and release of the CC template, special cause variation was detected, and centerline shifted to 88.1% (Fig 2). Average charges per encounter increased from $4527 to $5385. There was no reported refusal of payment. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully achieved improvements in CC documentation in the 3 diagnoses of interest through education and process changes in documentation, leading over $1 million in new charges over the past 15 months.

Reducing Chest Radiographs in Bronchiolitis Through High-Reliability Interventions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization in the United States, resulting in significant morbidity and health care resource use. Despite American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations against obtaining chest radiographs (CXRs) for bronchiolitis, variation in care continues. Historically, clinical practice guidelines and educational campaigns have had mixed success in reducing unnecessary CXR use. Our aim was to reduce CXR use for children <2 years with a primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis, regardless of emergency department (ED) disposition or preexisting conditions, from 42.1% to <15% of encounters by March 2020. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was created at our institution in 2012 to standardize bronchiolitis care. Given success with higher reliability interventions in asthma, similar interventions affecting workflow were subsequently pursued with bronchiolitis, starting in 2017, by using quality improvement science methods. The primary outcome was the percent of bronchiolitis encounters with a CXR. The balancing measure was return visits within 72 hours to the ED. Statistical process control charts were used to monitor and analyze data obtained from an internally created dashboard. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2020, our hospital had 12 120 bronchiolitis encounters. Preimplementation baseline revealed a mean of 42.1% for CXR use. Low reliability interventions, like educational campaigns, resulted in unsustained effects on CXR use. Higher reliability interventions were associated with sustained reductions to 23.3% and 18.9% over the last 4 years. There was no change in ED return visits. CONCLUSIONS: High-reliability workflow redesign was more effective in translating American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations into sustained practice than educational campaigns.

A closer look at ARSA activity in a patient with metachromatic leukodystrophy.

Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease mainly caused by a deficiency of arylsulfatase A activity. The typical clinical course of patients with the late infantile form includes a regression in motor skills with progression to dysphagia, seizures, hypotonia and death. We present a case of a 4-year-old female with rapidly progressive developmental regression with loss of motor milestones, spasticity and dysphagia. MRI showed volume loss and markedly abnormal deep white matter. Enzymatic testing in one laboratory showed arylsulfatase A activity in their normal range. However, extraction of urine showed a large increase in sulfatide excretion in a second laboratory. Measurement of arylsulfatase A in that laboratory showed a partial decrease in arylsulfatase A activity measured under typical conditions (about 37% of the normal mean). When the concentration of substrate in the assay was lowered to one quarter of that normally used, this individual had activity <10% of controls. The patient was found to be homozygous for an unusual missense mutation in the arylsulfatase A gene confirming the diagnosis of MLD. This case illustrates the importance of careful biochemical and molecular testing for MLD if there is suspicion of this diagnosis.

External validation of a clinical prediction rule for very low risk pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is frequently used to identify intra-abdominal injuries in children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) proposed a prediction rule to identify children with BAT who are at very low risk for clinically-important intra-abdominal injuries (CIIAI) in whom CT can be avoided. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of this prediction rule in identifying patients at very low risk for CIIAI in our pediatric trauma registry. METHODS: Retrospective review of our institutional trauma registry to identify patients with CIIAI. CIIAI included cases resulting in death, therapeutic intervention at laparotomy, angiographic embolization of intra-abdominal arterial bleeding, blood transfusion for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and administration of intravenous fluids for two or more nights for pancreatic or gastrointestinal injuries. Patients were identified using ICD diagnosis and procedure codes. Kappa was calculated to evaluate inter-reviewer agreement. RESULTS: Of 5743 patients, 133 (2.3%) had CIIAI. 60% were male and the mean age was 8 (SD 4.4) years. One patient with CIIAI met the proposed very low risk criteria, resulting in a prediction rule sensitivity of 99%, 95% CI [96-100%]. This patient also had extra-abdominal arterial bleeding requiring revascularization, offering an alternative reason for transfusion. Kappa was 0.85, 95% CI [0.82, 0.89], indicating strong inter-rater agreement. CONCLUSIONS: One out of 133 patients with CIIAI met very low risk criteria based on the PECARN prediction rule. This study supports the PECARN clinical prediction rule in decreasing CT use in pediatric patients at very low risk for CIIAI.