Does hysteroscopy facilitate tumor cell dissemination? Incidence of peritoneal cytology from patients with early stage endometrial carcinoma following dilatation and curettage (D & C) versus hysteroscopy and D & C.

BACKGROUND: In several case reports, distension and irrigation of the uterine cavity during fluid hysteroscopy was suspected to cause tumor cell dissemination into the abdominal cavity in patients with endometrial carcinoma. It was the aim of this study to compare the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology in patients who underwent dilatation and curettage (D & C) with or without previous hysteroscopy. METHODS: The authors conducted a multicentric, retrospective cohort analysis. One hundred thirteen consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma treated between 1996 and 1997 were included. Endometrial carcinoma had to be limited to the inner half or less than the inner half of the myometrium (pathologic Stage IA,B). Positive peritoneal cytology was obtained during staging laparotomy. Patients underwent D & C either with or without prior diagnostic fluid hysteroscopy. No selection or randomization was applied to the two groups. Positive peritoneal cytology, defined as malignant or suspicious, was considered the primary statistical endpoint. RESULTS: Peritoneal cytology was suspicious or positive in 10 of 113 patients (9%). The presence of suspicious or positive peritoneal cytology was associated with a history of hysteroscopy (P = 0.04) but not with myometrial invasion (P = 0.57), histologic subtype (P = 1.00) or grade (r = 0.16, P = 0.10), or the time between D & C and staging laparotomy (r = 0.04, P = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited extent of endometrial carcinoma in the current analysis, our data strongly suggest dissemination of endometrial carcinoma cells after fluid hysteroscopy. Determining whether a positive peritoneal cytology affects the prognoses of patients without further evidence of extrauterine disease will require longer follow-up.

Impact of hysteroscopy on disease-free survival in clinically stage I endometrial cancer patients.

Recent data strongly suggest tumor cell dissemination of endometrial carcinoma cells in the course of fluid hysteroscopy. In patients who had endometrial cancer which was (except for peritoneal cytology) confined to the uterus, the disease-free survival (DFS) of 135 patients who underwent hysteroscopy prior to staging laparotomy was compared with the DFS of 127 patients without hysteroscopy. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 10 patients experienced tumor recurrence. Although there was a trend towards a higher incidence of positive peritoneal cytology at laparotomy in patients who underwent hysteroscopy, this difference did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.47). For 5 years, the DFS was 92.4% in patients with hysteroscopy and 84.7% in patients without hysteroscopy before laparotomy (log-rank, P = 0.782). Our data therefore suggest a similar short-term DFS in endometrial cancer patients with and without hysteroscopy prior to laparotomy.

Endometrial cancer: accuracy of the finding of a well differentiated tumor at dilatation and curettage compared to the findings at subsequent hysterectomy.

The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy of the finding of a histologically well differentiated endometrial carcinoma at dilatation and curettage (D & C) prior to hysterectomy. A retrospective multicentric chart review of 137 endometrial cancer patients was conducted, including all patients in whom a well differentiated endometrial carcinoma had been diagnosed by D & C. Histopathologic grading as determined by D & C was compared with the grading established at the final histologic examination after hysterectomy. Seventy-eight percent of all cases in which a well differentiated tumor was diagnosed with D & C were confirmed as well differentiated endometrial carcinomas, whereas 20.4% had to be upgraded as moderately differentiated tumors after evaluation of the hysterectomy specimen. In one case in which a uterine adenocarcinoma was diagnosed by D & C, a well differentiated adenocarcinoma was found to be combined with a carcinosarcoma in the hysterectomy specimen. In order to avoid false findings of a well differentiated tumor, the histologic grade should be confirmed by intraoperative frozen section examination. This is especially important in cases in which surgical staging was not planned initially.

Influence of delayed diagnosis on established prognostic factors in endometrial cancer.

To evaluate the influence of delayed diagnosis on prognostic factors in endometrial cancer, we conducted a retrospective chart analysis based on the data of 116 postmenopausal patients with FIGO stage I-IV endometrial carcinoma. The interval from the first episode of post-menopausal vaginal bleeding to definitive, histological diagnosis (bleeding interval) was compared with tumor stage and various histomorphologic features in endometrial cancer. The mean bleeding interval was 12.7 +/- 17.8 weeks in 74 patients with FIGO stage IA, IB endometrial carcinoma and 35.2 +/- 69.3 weeks in 42 patients with stage IC-IV disease (t-test, p: 0.011). FIGO stage IA, IB disease was diagnosed in 23/26 (88%) patients with a bleeding interval <4 weeks, and in 22/34 (64%) and 29/56 (51%) patients with bleeding intervals of 4-8 weeks and >8 weeks, respectively (Chi-square 10.358, p=0.006). The correlation with histologic grade, lymph-node status, vessel invasion and histologic subtypes did not reach statistical significance. Our data confirm the clinical impression that postmenopausal vaginal bleeding is an early symptom in patients with endometrial cancer, and that advanced disease in the majority of cases might come from delayed diagnosis in women with poor compliance.

[Psychosocial prognostic factors for refertilization or IvF after tubal sterilization]. / Psychosoziale Prognosefaktoren für Refertilisierung oder IvF nach Tubensterilisation.

In a psychosomatic study we interviewed 33 women who had undergone tubal anastomosis or IvF after tubal ligation. As a control group we chose a randomised sample of 45 women after elective tubal ligation. We used a semi-structured interview and the Giessen-test as psychometric instruments. According to the leading indication for reanastomosis, we allocated women to one of 2 groups: 21 patients had found a new partner (R-partner), 12 mentioned experiences of loss (R-loss). The groups were well comparable in respect of sociodemographic items, but showed relevant differences in psychological variables, like motivation for and time for deliberation to sterilisation or age difference between partners. Women of the R-partner group were highly satisfied with tubal reanastomosis as compared to R-loss subjects. Satisfaction with the procedure was basically independent of an actual pregnancy. Women experienced the two methods in different, rather specific ways. Cluster analysis of the Giessen-test result confirmed group allocation. We conclude that experiences of loss as a leading reason for tubal reanastomosis are unfavourable prognostic factors. IvF has an unfavourable prognosis in women with the intention to restore the mutilated body image. Preoperative counselling by a psychotherapeutically trained counsellor seems mandatory.

[Coping with illness and body image following different surgical techniques in breast cancer]. / Krankheitsbewältigung und Körperbild nach unterschiedlichen Operationstechniken bei Brustkrebs.

Coping and body image were studied in 80 patients with breast cancer. We compared three groups, who had undergone different operative strategies: temporary expander prothesis (n = 19), excisional biopsy (n = 20) and modified radical mastectomy (n = 40). Instruments were: the Herschbach coping questionnaire, the Strauss and Appelt body image questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Patients after excisional biopsy showed significantly less illness-related stress than the other two groups, both in the number of all items named (p less than 0.02) and in the weighted total (p less than 0.05). Patients after modified mastectomy had chosen a different, "unfavourable" pattern of coping mechanisms than patients after expander prothesis or excisional biopsy: more resignation (p less than 0.05), less fighting and talking (p less than 0.05, respectively). In the body image questionnaire, no significant difference was found. However, in the semi-structured interview, patients after mastectomy mentioned more frequently that they avoided looking at the scar (p less than 0.05). These results underline the importance of preoperative counselling.