Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stem Cell Res ; 77: 103438, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776701

ABSTRACT

Here we present the generation of a human embryonic stem cell line with the potential to escape immune rejection upon transplantation to an alternate species, in this case sus scrofa. For in vivo detection the cells were modified by CRISPR-Cas9 to express human secreted alkaline phosphatase. To avoid immune recognition and subsequent rejection by host, genes encoding hB2M and hCIITA were knocked out and the porcine gene for CD47 was introduced. Upon editing and subsequent culture, cells maintained molecular and phenotypic pluripotent charactaristics and a normal karyotype supporting viability and functionality of the engineered cell line.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Human Embryonic Stem Cells , Animals , Humans , Human Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Human Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Swine , Cell Line
2.
Europace ; 24(12): 2015-2027, 2022 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726875

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Variants in SCN5A encoding Nav1.5 are associated with cardiac arrhythmias. We aimed to determine the mechanism by which c.638G>A in SCNA5 resulting in p.Gly213Asp (G213D) in Nav1.5 altered Na+ channel function and how flecainide corrected the defect in a family with multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions (MEPPC)-like syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five patients carrying the G213D variant were treated with flecainide. Gating pore currents were evaluated in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The 638G>A SCN5A variant was introduced to human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and subsequently differentiated to cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM). Action potentials and sodium currents were measured in the absence and presence of flecainide. Ca2+ transients were measured by confocal microscopy. The five patients exhibited premature atrial and ventricular contractions which were suppressed by flecainide treatment. G213D induced gating pore current at potentials negative to -50 mV. Voltage-clamp analysis in hiPSC-CM revealed the activation threshold of INa was shifted in the hyperpolarizing direction resulting in a larger INa window current. The G213D hiPSC-CMs had faster beating rates compared with wild-type and frequently showed Ca2+ waves and alternans. Flecainide applied to G213D hiPSC-CMs decreased window current by shifting the steady-state inactivation curve and slowed the beating rate. CONCLUSION: The G213D variant in Nav1.5 induced gating pore currents and increased window current. The changes in INa resulted in a faster beating rate and Ca2+ transient dysfunction. Flecainide decreased window current and inhibited INa, which is likely responsible for the therapeutic effectiveness of flecainide in MEPPC patients carrying the G213D variant.


Subject(s)
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , Myocytes, Cardiac , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel , Humans , Action Potentials/physiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/genetics , Flecainide/pharmacology , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/genetics , Phenotype , Sodium/metabolism
3.
CRISPR J ; 2(6): 362-369, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31860350

ABSTRACT

The current debate and policy surrounding the use of genome editing in humans typically relies on a binary distinction between therapy and human enhancement. Here, we argue that this dichotomy fails to take into account perhaps the most significant potential uses of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in humans. We argue that genetic treatment of sporadic Alzheimer's disease, breast and ovarian cancer predisposing BRCA1/2 mutations, and the introduction of human immunodeficiency virus resistance in humans should be considered within a new category of genetic protection treatments. We suggest that if this category is not introduced, life-altering research might be unnecessarily limited by current or future policy. Otherwise ad hoc decisions might be made, which introduce a risk of unforeseen moral costs, and might overlook or fail to address some important opportunities.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing/ethics , Primary Prevention/ethics , Primary Prevention/methods , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Gene Editing/methods , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/prevention & control , Genetic Therapy/ethics , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genome, Human , Humans , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...