Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy. In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 493 women were randomized 2 : 1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease, there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and chemotherapy-free survival numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (intent-to-treat population: 13.1 months; subgroup with visceral disease: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.

2.
Breast ; 54: 278-285, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242754

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite triple antiemetic therapy use for breast cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy, nausea remains a clinical challenge. We evaluated adding olanzapine (5 mg) to triple therapy on nausea control in patients at high personal risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). METHODS: This multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial randomized breast cancer patients scheduled to receive neo/adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide or platinum-based chemotherapy to olanzapine (5 mg, days 1-4) or placebo. Primary endpoint was frequency of self-reported significant nausea, repeated for all cycles of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included: duration of nausea, overall total control of CINV, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using FLIE questionnaire, use of rescue mediation and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: 218 eligible patients were randomised to placebo (105) or olanzapine (113). From days 0-5 following each cycle of chemotherapy, 41.3% (95%CI: 36.1-46.7%) of patients in the placebo group reported significant nausea compared to 27.7% (95%CI: 23.2-32.4%) in the olanzapine group (p = 0.001). Across all cycles of chemotherapy, patients receiving olanzapine experienced a statistically significant improvement in HRQoL (p < 0.001). Grade 1/2 sedation was the most commonly side effect reported at 40.8% in the placebo group vs. 54.1% with olanzapine (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients at high personal risk of CINV, the addition of olanzapine 5 mg daily to standard antiemetic therapy significantly improves the control of nausea, HRQoL, with no unexpected toxicities.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nausea/prevention & control , Olanzapine/administration & dosage , Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Quality of Life , Standard of Care , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/chemically induced , Young Adult
3.
Curr Oncol ; 22(Suppl 1): S114-22, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25848335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This systematic review addresses the question "What is the optimal targeted therapy for female patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2)-positive breast cancer?" METHODS: The medline and embase databases were searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major guideline organizations were also searched. RESULTS: Sixty publications relevant to the targeted therapy portion of the systematic review were identified. In four major trials (hera, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-31, North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831, and Breast Cancer International Research Group 006), adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year was superior in disease-free survival (dfs) and overall survival (os) to no trastuzumab; trastuzumab showed no benefit in one trial (pacs 04). A shorter duration of trastuzumab (less than 1 year compared with 1 year) was evaluated, with mixed results for dfs: one trial showed superiority (finher), one trial could not demonstrate noninferiority (phare), another trial showed equivalent results (E 2198), and one trial is still ongoing (persephone). Longer trastuzumab duration (hera: 2 years vs. 1 year) showed no improvement in dfs or os and a higher rate of cardiac events. Newer her2-targeted agents (lapatinib, pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib) have been or are still being evaluated in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials, either by direct comparison with trastuzumab alone or combined with trastuzumab. In the neoadjuvant setting (neoaltto, GeparQuinto, Neosphere), trastuzumab alone or in combination with another anti-her2 agent (lapatinib, pertuzumab) was compared with either lapatinib or pertuzumab alone and showed superior or equivalent rates of pathologic complete response. In the adjuvant setting, lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab, compared with trastuzumab alone (altto) or with placebo (teach), was not superior in dfs. The results of the completed aphinity trial, evaluating the role of dual her2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, are highly anticipated. Ongoing trials are evaluating trastuzumab as a single agent without adjuvant chemotherapy (respect) and in patients with low her2 expression (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-47). CONCLUSIONS: Taking into consideration disease characteristics and patient preference, 1 year of trastuzumab should be offered to all patients with her2-positive breast cancer who are receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Cardiac function should be regularly assessed in this patient population.

4.
Curr Oncol ; 22(Suppl 1): S67-81, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25848340

ABSTRACT

The Breast Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario identified the need for new guidelines for the adjuvant systemic therapy of early-stage breast cancer. The specific question to be addressed was "What is the optimal adjuvant systemic therapy for female patients with early-stage operable breast cancer, when patient and disease factors are considered?" A systematic review was prepared based on literature searches conducted using the medline and embase databases for the period January 2008 to March 5, 2012, and updated to May 12, 2014. Guidelines were located from that search, from the Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines, and from the Web sites of major guideline organizations. The literature located was subdivided into the broad categories of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and therapy targeted to her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Although several of the systemic therapies discussed in this guideline can be considered in the neoadjuvant setting, the review focused on trials with rates of disease-free and overall survival as endpoints and thus excluded several trials that used pathologic complete response as a primary endpoint. Based on the systematic review, the working group drafted recommendations on the use of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy; based on their professional experience, they also drafted recommendations on patient and disease characteristics and recurrence risk. The literature review and draft recommendations were circulated to a consensus panel of medical oncologists who had expertise in breast cancer and who represented the regions of Ontario. Items without initial consensus were discussed at an in-person consensus meeting held in Toronto, November 23, 2012. The final recommendations are those for which consensus was reached before or at the meeting. Some of the key evidence was revised after the updated literature search. Evidence reviews for systemic chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy for her2-positive disease are reported in separate articles in this supplement. The full three-part 1-21 evidence-based series, including complete details of the development and consensus processes, can be found on the Cancer Care Ontario Web site at https://www.cancercare.on.ca/toolbox/qualityguidelines/diseasesite/breast-ebs.

5.
Curr Oncol ; 22(Suppl 1): S82-94, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25848343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) of Cancer Care Ontario recently created an evidence-based consensus guideline on the systemic treatment of early breast cancer. The evidence for the guideline was compiled using a systematic review to answer the question "What is the optimal systemic therapy for patients with early-stage, operable breast cancer, when patient and disease factors are considered?" The question was addressed in three parts: cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine treatment, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2)-directed therapy. METHODS: For the systematic review, the medline and embase databases were searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major oncology guideline organizations were also searched. The basic search terms were "breast cancer" and "systemic therapy" (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted agents, ovarian suppression), and results were limited to randomized controlled trials (rcts), guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. RESULTS: Several hundred documents that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group meta-analyses encompassed many of the rcts found. Several additional studies that met the inclusion criteria were retained, as were other guidelines and systematic reviews. Chemotherapy was reviewed mainly in three classes: anti-metabolite-based regimens (for example, cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil), anthracyclines, and taxane-based regimens. In general, single-agent chemotherapy is not recommended for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in any patient population. Anthracycline-taxane-based polychemotherapy regimens are, overall, considered superior to earlier-generation regimens and have the most significant impact on patient survival outcomes. Regimens with varying anthracycline and taxane doses and schedules are options; in general, paclitaxel given every 3 weeks is inferior. Evidence does not support the use of bevacizumab in the adjuvant setting; other systemic therapy agents such as metformin and vaccines remain investigatory. Adjuvant bisphosphonates for menopausal women will be discussed in later work. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review constitute a comprehensive compilation of the high-level evidence that is the basis for the 2014 pebc guideline on systemic therapy for early breast cancer. Use of cytotoxic chemotherapy is presented here; the results addressing endocrine therapy and her2-targeted treatment, and the final clinical practice recommendations, are published separately in this supplement.

6.
Curr Oncol ; 22(Suppl 1): S95-S113, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25848344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) recently created an evidence-based consensus guideline on the systemic treatment of early breast cancer. The evidence for the guideline was compiled using a systematic review to answer the question "What is the optimal systemic therapy for patients with early-stage, operable breast cancer, when patient and disease factors are considered?" The question was addressed in three parts: cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine treatment, and her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-targeted therapy. METHODS: For the systematic review, the literature in the medline and embase databases was searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major oncology guideline organizations were also searched. The basic search terms were "breast cancer" and "systemic therapy" (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted agents, ovarian suppression), and results were limited to randomized controlled trials (rcts), guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. RESULTS: Several hundred documents that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved. Meta-analyses from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group encompassed many of the rcts found. Several additional studies that met the inclusion criteria were retained, as were other guidelines and systematic reviews. SUMMARY: The results of the systematic review constitute a comprehensive compilation of high-level evidence, which was the basis for the 2014 pebc guideline on systemic therapy for early breast cancer. The review of the evidence for systemic endocrine therapy (adjuvant tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and ovarian ablation and suppression) is presented here; the evidence for chemotherapy and her2-targeted treatment-and the final clinical practice recommendations-are presented separately in this supplement.

8.
Curr Oncol ; 17(4): 42-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20697513

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With the widespread use of sequential anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, clinicians are becoming rapidly aware of toxicities associated with those regimens. Despite the low incidence reported in the literature of significant arthralgia and myalgia with those regimens, it is clinically evident that a substantial proportion of patients develop such toxicities. We performed a pilot study to investigate the extent of this problem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy [doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (AC-T), doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC-D), or 5-fluourouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (FEC-D)] completed a retrospective outcomes-based survey. The survey utilized the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane Scale, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, and a modified Brief Pain Inventory. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 82 patients. Interviewees had received AC-T (43%), FEC-D (43%), and AC-D (14%). Pain as a side effect of either the anthracycline or the taxane chemotherapy was reported by 87% of patients. Most of the patients (79%) indicated that their worst pain occurred during the taxane component of treatment. Compared with paclitaxel, docetaxel was reported to cause more pain. Narcotics for pain management were required by 35 of 82 patients (43%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients receiving sequential anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer experience pain, particularly during the taxane component. Prospective patient-reported outcome assessments are needed to help individualize treatment interventions and to improve symptom management in this population.

9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 119(1): 22-5, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20591472

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There are no evidence based guidelines for the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to review our diagnostic practice, provide guidelines for clinical practice, and suggest a diagnostic strategy for validation in future prospective trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery was performed. Final diagnoses were based on expert pathology review of surgical specimens. Diagnostic strategies were defined as histologic, cytologic and clinical. Performance of these strategies in predicting final pathology was compared. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2007, 149 patients were identified. Initial diagnosis was made on the basis of: cytology (paracentesis, thoracentesis, or fine needle aspirate) 72% (108 patients); histology (core biopsy, surgery) 18% (26), clinical (Radiology and CA-125) 10% (15). The final diagnosis was consistent with invasive EOC in 96% of patients. The diagnostic accuracies of the 3 strategies were: cytology 98%, histology 92%, and clinical 87%, (p=0.04). Specific EOC subtype was identified in 59% of patients (histology 77% and cytology 55%). When available, the initial subtype corresponded to the final subtype in 85% of cases: histology 80%, cytology 86%. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer based on cytology and histology are superior to clinical factors alone. In a centre with trained gynecologic cytopathologists, a diagnosis of EOC by cytology is not significantly inferior to a diagnosis made by histology. These data are important for clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 119(1): 155-61, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19731013

ABSTRACT

Several adjuvant endocrine strategies exist for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. This study compared the effect of two sequences of aromatase inhibitor use [steroidal (exemestane) and non-steroidal (anastrozole)] on serological and pathological biomarkers when given in the neoadjuvant setting to postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Thirty women were assigned to receive exemestane 25 mg or anastrozole 1 mg each given for 8 weeks in a randomized sequence. The effect of this treatment on serum estrone sulfate and estradiol levels, as well as tumor changes in the proliferation biomarker Ki67 were evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. WHO clinical response criteria, patient preference, and quality of life were also assessed. Assessable data was available from 28 patients. There were no differences in concentration changes of serum estradiol or Ki67 between patients in the two arms. Overall clinical response rate was 68% (19/28 assessable patients) and clinical benefit was 93% (26/28 assessable patients). There was no significant difference in toxicity or quality of life scores. The majority of patients expressed a personal preference for anastrozole over exemestane. Results suggest that the order of steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors has little effect on outcome. The majority of patients express clear preferences for drug treatments.


Subject(s)
Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Biomarkers/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastrozole , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cell Proliferation , Drug Administration Schedule , Estradiol/blood , Female , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen/biosynthesis , Middle Aged , Postmenopause , Treatment Outcome
11.
Clin Exp Metastasis ; 26(8): 935-43, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19697143

ABSTRACT

The molecular mechanisms underlying the development of bone metastases in breast cancer remain unclear. Disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients are commonly identified, even in early stage disease, but their potential to initiate metastases is not known. The mechanism whereby DTCs become overt metastatic tumour cells (MTCs) is therefore, an area of considerable interest. This study explored the analysable yield of genetic material from human biopsy samples in order to describe differences in gene expression between DTCs and bone MTCs. Thirteen breast cancer patients with bone metastases underwent a CT-guided bone metastasis biopsy and a bone marrow biopsy. Tumour cells were enriched and gene expression profiling was conducted to identify differentially expressed genes. The analysable yield of sufficient RNA for microarray analysis was 60% from bone metastasis biopsies and 80% from bone marrow biopsies. A signature of 133 candidate genes differentially expressed between DTCs and MTCs was identified. Several genes relevant to breast cancer metastasis to bone (osteopontin, CTGF, parathyroid hormone receptor, EGFR) were significantly overexpressed in MTCs as compared to DTCs. Biopsies of bone metastases and bone marrow rarely yield enough tissue for robust molecular biology studies using clinical samples. The findings obtained however are interesting and seem to overlap with the bone metastasis gene expression signature described in murine xenograft models. Larger biopsy specimens or improved RNA extraction techniques may improve analysable yield and feasibility of these techniques.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/genetics , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biopsy , Bone Marrow/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Prospective Studies , RNA, Neoplasm/analysis
12.
Clin Exp Metastasis ; 26(5): 479-84, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19266291

ABSTRACT

Initiation of bisphosphonate therapy in bisphosphonate-naïve patients is known to be associated with radiological changes such as increased bone density in both osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases. It is not known, however, whether switching from a second-generation bisphosphonate to a more potent agent is associated with similar changes. This study aimed to prospectively explore radiological changes, as assessed by thoracolumbar CT scanning, in patients switching from an early generation bisphosphonate (i.e., oral clodronate or intravenous pamidronate) to intravenous zoledronic acid. Patients with progressive bone metastases despite use of an earlier generation bisphosphonate were switched to zoledronic acid as part of a study to evaluate the palliative benefit of this intervention. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scanning of the thoracolumbar spine was carried out at baseline, and repeated 4 months after commencing zoledronic acid. The effect of this change of therapy was explored in terms of bone density, as well as volume of osteolytic and osteoblastic disease. Fifteen patients were assessed. Switching of bisphosphonate therapy was associated with a significant increase in bone density, and an increase in osteoblastic volume. There was an insignificant trend towards reduced osteolytic volume. In conclusion, switching from early generation bisphosphonates to a more potent agent is associated with radiological changes similar to those seen when commencing a bisphosphonate in treatment-naïve patients. This is consistent with the observed palliative benefit. The use of QCT may be of benefit in the monitoring of bone metastases.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Adult , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Medical Oncology/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Zoledronic Acid
13.
Clin Exp Metastasis ; 26(2): 97-103, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18941910

ABSTRACT

The spinal column is the most frequent site of bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. It is important to understand how the pattern of vertebral lesions may be affected by the introduction of modern cancer therapies. The purpose of this study was to characterize changes in the radiological appearance of spinal column metastases over the past decade using highly automated Computed Tomography (CT) based computational analysis methods. Two case series studies were performed using CT scans of patients with confirmed spinal metastases secondary to breast cancer: Cohort A with CT scans acquired between 1998 and 2001 and Cohort B with CT scans acquired between 2004 and 2007. Diseased vertebrae were classified as lytic, blastic, or mixed based on CT scan intensity through an automated 3D computer algorithm. The relative incidence of lytic vertebral metastases decreased in comparing Cohort B to Cohort A (12% vs. 49%) with a corresponding increase in mixed lesions (51% vs. 18%) Significant associations were found between the percentage of lytic lesions in number of diseased vertebrae measured per patient and lack of bisphosphonate use (RR = 2.6) and for membership in Cohort A vs. Cohort B (RR = 5.9). This work highlights a change in the CT appearance of vertebral metastases from breast cancer during the past decade toward a lower proportion of lytic disease. Observation of patient therapies suggests that differences in radiological assessment may be linked, at least in part, to bisphosphonate use. These findings have important implications for both clinical practice and research strategies involving vertebral metastases.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Autoanalysis , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteolysis/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spine/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
14.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 99(3): 241-7, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16752075

ABSTRACT

Aromatase inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, approximately 22% of all cases of breast cancer in North America are diagnosed in women below the age of 50 and a substantial proportion of these women are pre-menopausal. In the pre-menopausal population with hormone receptor positive disease, research on the use of aromatase inhibitors is only beginning to emerge. In this review, the mechanism of action of aromatase inhibitors and the history of endocrine treatment for pre-menopausal breast cancer is briefly presented. Available research to date regarding efficacy and toxicity of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of pre-menopausal breast cancer and future research directions are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Estrogens/metabolism , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Premenopause , Adult , Anastrozole , Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Drug Therapy/trends , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/metabolism , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Triazoles/therapeutic use
15.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 31(1): 1-17, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15707700

ABSTRACT

Despite improvements in the management of patients with early breast cancer, the prognosis for women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains poor. The potential goals of neoadjuvant treatment for this disease include down-sizing tumours to allow breast conservation as well as the possibility of improving survival rates. Neoadjuvant treatment was initially dominated by chemotherapy, which increased rates of breast conserving surgery, but to date has demonstrated no survival benefit over standard adjuvant chemotherapy. With recent advances in endocrine therapy, and rapid and routine assessment of predictive factors of response such as estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and Her2 nu receptor status, endocrine therapy has come to the forefront of research investigating a neoadjuvant alternative to chemotherapy. Early studies of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy mainly evaluated the role of tamoxifen in the treatment of elderly postmenopausal women with LABC who were unselected for ER/PR status and were unsuitable for either surgery or chemotherapy. Response rates in these patients were found to be inferior to those traditionally obtained from trials with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Paralleling the superiority that third-generation aromatase inhibitors have shown over tamoxifen in the metastatic and adjuvant settings however, AIs have also demonstrated superiority in the neoadjuvant setting. Recent studies have shown response rates for neoadjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors in carefully selected hormone receptor positive patients to be comparable to those seen with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This is particularly important as hormone receptor positive tumours have repeatedly been shown to have lower response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than hormone receptor negative tumours. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors has therefore evolved from being an experimental effort to palliate women with LABC unsuitable for surgery or chemotherapy, to representing a viable and possibly preferred alternative for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive large tumours or LABC. Further benefits of neoadjuvant trials include allowing the study of predictive biomarkers of disease in order to provide insight into therapy resistance and sensitivity, and identifying promising systemic therapies for additional testing in larger adjuvant trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Anastrozole , Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Letrozole , Mastectomy, Segmental , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptors, Estrogen/drug effects , Survival Analysis , Tamoxifen/pharmacology , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Triazoles/therapeutic use
16.
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can ; 35(2): 90-3, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12755127

ABSTRACT

The four-volume corpus The Faith Factor, and Scientific Research on Spirituality and Health: A Consensus Report by Larson et al constitute the largest English-language review of research on spirituality and health. We have done a critique of the 329 systematic analyses of peer-reviewed research papers presented therein. The objectives were to determine if the Larson conclusions can be generalized; to document the understanding of the potential of qualitative research in assessing the spiritual domain; and to examine whether the definitions of religion and spirituality used by Larson et al correspond to those in general use. We conclude that their results cannot be generalized to other religious and cultural settings; that there is a need for more research focusing on age groups, cultures, religions, and clinical settings not adequately represented in studies to date; and that the need for more qualitative research methods justifies a detailed analysis of the use of qualitative methods in the studies reviewed by the Larson group. Finally, there is a need to establish a common vocabulary that bridges cultural and religious traditions, and facilitates clinical care, research, and teaching relating to spirituality, religion, and health.


Subject(s)
Health , Qualitative Research , Religion and Medicine , Research Design , Spirituality , Culture , Humans , Peer Review, Research
17.
Virology ; 272(1): 85-97, 2000 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10873751

ABSTRACT

Bacteriophage D3112 is a Mu-like temperate transposable phage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetic mapping and DNA sequence analysis have identified the left end of the phage genome as encoding the transposase enzyme (A) and the lysogenic (c) repressor. The c open reading frame (ORF), located at the leftmost end of the phage genome and transcribed from right to left, has four possible GTG initiation codons. Using site-directed mutagenesis, each of the four GTG codons was modified to GTA, which cannot serve as an initiation codon. Plasmids were constructed expressing either the wild-type repressor ORF or the ORFs containing the mutated GTA codons. When introduced into Pseudomonas aeruginosa, no immunity to superinfection by D3112 was observed when the second GTG had been mutated. Northern blotting analysis demonstrated that the D3112 c repressor is transcribed as a 900-nt mRNA. The promoter region was defined by transcriptional lacZ fusions and primer extension analyses to bp 972-940 from the left end of the phage genome. When the D3112 c repressor was overexpressed and purified as a fusion protein with a C-terminal six-histidine extension (cts15-His6), it showed high affinity for a 261-bp PvuII fragment localized directly upstream of the c repressor ORF. Our results indicate that although D3112 c shows higher amino acid similarity to the lambda family of repressors than it does to those of Mu and D108, it appears that its structure and function more accurately reflect an evolutionary ancestry with those from transposable coliphages Mu and D108.


Subject(s)
DNA Transposable Elements/genetics , Genes, Viral/genetics , Lysogeny/genetics , Pseudomonas Phages/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Viral Proteins/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Base Sequence , Cloning, Molecular , Codon, Initiator/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/isolation & purification , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Genes, Reporter/genetics , Lysogeny/immunology , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutation/genetics , Open Reading Frames/genetics , Operator Regions, Genetic/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Pseudomonas Phages/physiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/virology , RNA, Messenger/analysis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/chemistry , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/isolation & purification , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/chemistry , Repressor Proteins/isolation & purification , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Viral Proteins/chemistry , Viral Proteins/isolation & purification , Viral Proteins/metabolism
18.
Br J Psychol ; 89 ( Pt 2): 249-63, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9644823

ABSTRACT

Masters (1992) argued that an implicitly acquired motor skill is less likely to fail under pressure than an explicitly acquired skill. He demonstrated this by showing that induced anxiety led to differences in the golf putting performance of groups who had acquired the skill implicitly and explicitly. We replicated Masters' basic findings but our results suggest that the difference in performance under pressure is more readily explained in terms of differences between the learning and testing conditions. Our results are consistent with an explicit learning account of the putting task and we found no support for the claim that implicit and explicit learning of motor skills are differentially affected by anxiety.


Subject(s)
Awareness , Learning , Motor Skills , Stress, Psychological , Analysis of Variance , Female , Golf , Humans , Male , New South Wales , Psychological Theory
19.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 95(2): 187, 1977 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-268373
20.
J Conf Workshop ; : 14-8, 1967.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5230713
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...