MCL internal brace does not fully recapitulate normal MCL function in valgus stress.

PURPOSE: The null hypothesis is that there would be no difference in medial gapping under valgus load between the intact MCL and the ruptured MCL with an internal brace in place. METHODS: Eight pairs of cadaver knees were used (16 knees). Alternating sides, one knee from each pair was used for one of two "internal brace" constructs. The constructs involved different methods of fixation for securing FiberTape (Arthrex, Naples, FL) to both the femur and tibia in an effort to brace the MCL. The knees were then subjected to valgus stress by applying 10 N m of torque with the knee at 20 degrees of flexion. The amount of medial joint space opening was measured on radiographs. The stress testing was conducted with three MCL states: intact, grade 2 tear, and grade 3 tear. RESULTS: In the Construct I specimens, gapping increased from 0.7 mm with the MCL intact to 1.1 mm with grade 2 tearing (p < 0.01), and to 1.3 mm with grade 3 tearing (p < 0.01). In the Construct II specimens, gapping increased from 0.7 mm with the MCL intact to 1.0 mm with grade 2 tearing (p < 0.01), and to 1.1 mm with grade 3 tearing (n.s.). Construct I specimens failed primarily at the femoral attachment. All Construct II specimens survived the valgus stress testing. CONCLUSION: Construct I did not maintain tension. Construct II did maintain tension during application of valgus load, but did not restore valgus opening to the intact state. It is important for clinicians who are considering using this commercially available technique to be aware of how the construct performs under valgus stress testing compared to the intact MCL.

Allograft-Reconstructed Iliac Bone Graft Donor Site Remodels to Viable Bone and Its Feasibility for Revision Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Bone autograft options may be limited in revision spinal fusion cases. Reconstruction of the iliac bone graft (IBG) donor site with cancellous bone allograft allows for reharvest for patients who subsequently have another fusion. This study examined viability of the reconstructed IBG (RIBG) donor sites. Secondarily, we assessed the feasibility of whether the RIBG sites could be reharvested for obtaining a successful arthrodesis for a secondary fusion. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 154 consecutive lumbar revision fusions were reviewed, of which 17 cases had their IBG donor site backfilled with allograft bone at the time of their primary fusion and subsequently had secondary surgery for a pseudarthrosis repair or fusion extension. Biopsies of the RIBG and computed tomography (CT) images were obtained at the time of secondary fusion. Histology analyzed the ratio of filled to unfilled lacunae and marrow cellularity. Histology controls were from normal iliac crest. Clinically, postoperative CT and >2-year outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) evaluated the feasibility of the secondary fusion surgery using RIBG. The RIBG fusion rate and outcomes were compared with clinical control revision groups that had IBG and/or bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) used for their revision fusion. RESULTS: CT images prior to RIBG harvest found bony healing of the original graft donor site in all except 1 case. RIBG bone marrow histology found lower cellularity vs controls, but this characteristic did not appear to compromise bone viability with filled lacunae in 83% ± 14% in the RIBG group, vs 88% ± 8% for iliac controls. After revision fusion, often combined with bone growth stimulator or BMP, repeat CT demonstrated solid spinal fusions in 16 of 17 patients, whereas control revision group fusion rates were approximately 80%. Clinical improvement was significant (VAS decrease = 3.8, ODI decrease = 16.5) and comparable with the IBG revision controls. CONCLUSION: RIBG using allograft remodels into viable predominately cancellous bone and is clinically feasible for revision fusion if IBG or BMP is unavailable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Reconstructed iliac bone graft is viable and may be used as a bone graft option.

Biomechanical Stability of the Sacroiliac Joint with Differing Implant Configurations in a Synthetic Model.

BACKGROUND: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is responsible for 15%-30% of chronic low back pain and fusion is increasingly used to alleviate chronic SIJ pain in adults. However, questions remain as to the most effective implant patterns to stabilize the joint. The objective of this biomechanical study was to evaluate how different implant spacing, configuration and quantity effect range of motion (ROM) of a synthetic foam SIJ model. METHODS: Triangular SIJ fusion implants were tested in six patterns using three implants, and two patterns with two implants (n = 5/pattern). Linear, triangular, and angled (10° or 20°) implant patterns were used with spacing of 13 or 22 mm between implants. Implants were placed through a denser polyurethane foam block (0.32 g/cm3) representing the ilium and into a less dense block representing the sacrum (0.16 g/cm3) to a depth 30 mm with a 2-mm gap between blocks. Cyclic torsion and shear testing were conducted for 10,000 cycles and ROM was recorded. Pullout testing was conducted on non-cycled (n = 10) implants and individually on all implants after construct cycling. RESULTS: ROM was significantly lower for all 22-mm implant patterns compared to the 13 mm linear pattern after cyclic loading in both torsion and shear. The use of three implants provided 60% and 86% greater stability, respectively, than two implants with spacing of 22 and 13 mm. Pullout resistance followed similar trends with the lowest forces occurring in closely spaced patterns that used two implants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the use of three implants and maximizing the spacing between implants might provide greater stability to the SIJ. If implants must be placed closely, then nonlinear patterns may improve construct stability.

Mechanical Performance of Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Growing Rod Implants: Experimental and Computational Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental and computational study of posterior spinal instrumentation and growing rod constructs per ASTM F1717-15 vertebrectomy methodology for static compressive bending. OBJECTIVE: Assess mechanical performance of standard fusion instrumentation and growing rod constructs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Growing rod instrumentation utilizes fewer anchors and spans longer distances, increasing shared implant loads relative to fusion. There is a need to evaluate growing rod's mechanical performance. ASTM F1717-15 standard assesses performance of spinal instrumentation; however, effects of growing rods with side-by-side connectors have not been evaluated. METHODS: Standard and growing rod constructs were tested per ASTM F1717-15 methodology; setup was modified for growing rod constructs to allow for connector offset. Three experimental groups (standard with active length 76 mm, and growing rods with active lengths 76 and 376 mm; n = 5/group) were tested; stiffness, yield load, and load at maximum displacement were calculated. Computational models were developed and used to locate stress concentrations. RESULTS: For both constructs at 76 mm active length, growing rod stiffness (49 ±â€Š0.8 N/mm) was significantly greater than standard (43 ±â€Š0.4 N/mm); both were greater than growing rods at 376 mm (10 ±â€Š0.3 N/mm). No significant difference in yield load was observed between growing rods (522 ±â€Š12 N) and standard (457 ±â€Š19 N) constructs of 76 mm. Growing rod constructs significantly decreased from 76 mm (522 ±â€Š12 N) to 376 mm active length (200 ±â€Š2 N). Maximum load of growing rods at 76 mm (1084 ±â€Š11 N) was significantly greater than standard at 76 mm (1007 ±â€Š7 N) and growing rods at 376 mm active length (392 ±â€Š5 N). Simulations with active length of 76 mm were within 10% of experimental mechanical characteristics; stress concentrations were at the apex and cranial to connector-rod interaction for standard and growing rod models, respectively. CONCLUSION: Growing rod constructs are stronger and stiffer than spinal instrumentation constructs; with an increased length accompanied a decrease in strength. Growing rod construct stress concentration locations observed during computational simulation are consistent with clinically observed failure locations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Morphologic and biomechanical comparison of spinous processes and ligaments from scoliotic and kyphotic patients.

The spinous processes and supraspinous and interspinous ligaments (SSL and ISL, respectively) limit flexion and may relate to spinal curvature. Spinous process angles and mechanical properties of explanted human thoracic posterior SSL/ISL complexes were compared for scoliosis (n=14) vs. kyphosis (n=8) patients. The median thoracic coronal Cobb angle for scoliosis patients was 48°, and sagittal angles for kyphosis patients was 78°. Spinous processes were gripped and four strain steps of 4% were applied and held. Percent relaxation was calculated over each step, equilibrium load data were fit to an exponential equation, and a Kelvin model was fit to the load from all four curves. Failure testing was also performed. Median ligament complex dimensions from scoliosis and kyphosis patients were, respectively: ISL width=16.5mm and 16.0mm; SSL width=4.3mm and 3.8mm; ISL+SSL area=17.2mm and 25.7mm; these differences were not significant. Significant differences did exist in terms of spinous process angle vs. spine axis (47° for scoliosis and 32° for kyphosis) and SSL thickness (2.1mm for scoliosis and 3.0mm for kyphosis). Fourth-step median relaxation was 42% for scoliosis and 49% for kyphosis. Median linear region stiffness was 42N/mm for scoliosis and 51N/mm for kyphosis. Median failure load was 191N for scoliotic and 175N for kyphotic ligaments. Differences in loading, relaxation, viscoelastic and failure parameters were not statistically significant, except for a trend for greater initial rate of relaxation (T1) for scoliosis ligaments. However, we found significant morphological differences related to the spinous processes, which suggests a need for future biomechanical studies related to the musculoskeletal aspects of spinal alignment and posture.

Range of motion, sacral screw and rod strain in long posterior spinal constructs: a biomechanical comparison between S2 alar iliac screws with traditional fixation strategies.

BACKGROUND: S1 screw failure and L5/S1 non-union are issues with long fusions to S1. Improved construct stiffness and S1 screw offloading can help avoid this. S2AI screws have shown to provide similar stiffness to iliac screws when added to L3-S1 constructs. We sought to examine and compare the biomechanical effects on an L2-S1 pedicle screw construct of adding S2AI screws, AxiaLIF, L5-S1 interbody support via transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and to examine the effect of the addition of cross connectors to each of these constructs. METHODS: Two S1 screws and one rod with strain gauges (at L5/S1) were used in L2-S1 screw-rod constructs in 7 L1-pelvis specimens (two with low BMD). ROM, S1 screw and rod strain were assessed using a pure-moment flexibility testing protocol. Specimens were tested intact, and then in five instrumentation states consisting of: (I) Pedicle screws (PS) L2-S1; (II) PS + S2AI screws; (III) PS + TLIF L5/S1; (IV) PS + AxiaLIF L5/S1; (V) PS + S2AI + AxiaLIF L5/S1. The five instrumentation conditions were also tested with crosslinks at L2/3 and S1/2. Tests were conducted in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial torsion with no compressive preload. RESULTS: S2A1 produces reduced S1 screw strain for flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial torsion, as well as reduced rod strain in lateral bending and axial torsion in comparison to AxiaLIF and interbody instrumentation, at the expense of increased rod flexion-extension strain. Cross-connectors may have a role in further reduction of S1 screw and rod strain. CONCLUSIONS: From a biomechanical standpoint, the use of the S2AI technique is at least equivalent to traditional iliac screws, but offers lower prominence and ease of assembly compared to conventional sacroiliac stabilization.

Flexibility and fatigue evaluation of oblique as compared with anterior lumbar interbody cages with integrated endplate fixation.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to quantify the in vitro range of motion (ROM) of oblique as compared with anterior lumbar interbody devices, pullout resistance, and subsidence in fatigue. METHODS: Anterior and oblique cages with integrated plate fixation (IPF) were tested using lumbar motion segments. Flexibility tests were conducted on the intact segments, cage, cage + IPF, and cage + IPF + pedicle screws (6 anterior, 7 oblique). Pullout tests were then performed on the cage + IPF. Fatigue testing was conducted on the cage + IPF specimens for 30,000 cycles. RESULTS: No ROM differences were observed in any test group between anterior and oblique cage constructs. The greatest reduction in ROM was with supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Peak pullout forces were 637 ± 192 N and 651 ± 127 N for the anterior and oblique implants, respectively. The median cage subsidence was 0.8 mm and 1.4 mm for the anterior and oblique cages, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and oblique cages similarly reduced ROM in flexibility testing, and the integrated fixation prevented device displacement. Subsidence was minimal during fatigue testing, most of which occurred in the first 2500 cycles.

Kinematic and fatigue biomechanics of an interpositional facet arthroplasty device.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although approximately 30% of chronic lumbar pain can be attributed to the facets, limited surgical options exist for patients. Interpositional facet arthroplasty (IFA) is a novel treatment for lumbar facetogenic pain designed to provide patients who gain insufficient relief from medical interventional treatment options with long-term relief, filling a void in the facet pain treatment continuum. PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the effect of IFA on segmental range of motion (ROM) compared with the intact state, and to observe device position and condition after 10,000 cycles of worst-case loading. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: In situ biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine following implantation of a novel IFA device was carried out. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric functional spinal units (L2-L3 and L5-S1) were tested in 7.5 Nm flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsion while intact and following device implantation. Additionally, specimens underwent 10,000 cycles of worst-case complex loading and were testing in ROM again. Load-displacement and fluoroscopic data were analyzed to determine ROM and to evaluate device position during cyclic testing. Devices and facets were evaluated post testing. Institutional support for implant evaluation was received by Zyga Technology. RESULTS: Range of motion post implantation decreased versus intact, and then was restored post cyclic-testing. Of the tested devices, 6.5% displayed slight movement (0.5-2 mm), all from tight L2-L3 facet joints with misplaced devices or insufficient cartilage. No damage was observed on the devices, and wear patterns were primarily linear. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this in situ cadaveric biomechanics and cyclic fatigue study demonstrate that a low-profile, conformable IFA device can maintain position and facet functionality post implantation and through 10,000 complex loading cycles. In vivo conditions were not accounted for in this model, which may affect implant behavior not predictable via a biomechanical study. However, these data along with published 1-year clinical results suggest that IFA may be a valid treatment option in patients with chronic lumbar zygapophysial pain who have exhausted medical interventional options.

Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model.

STUDY DESIGN: A cadaveric lumbosacral spondylolytic spondylolisthesis model was used to evaluate the biomechanical function of 2 different interbody spacers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the reduction in pedicle screw strain and spine range of motion (ROM) between transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and an axial interbody threaded rod (AxialITR) in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Symptomatic spondylolytic spondylolisthesis is often treated with posterior instrumented fusion augmented by a variety of different interbody devices. Interbody spacers rely primarily on posterior instrumentation to stabilize the spine during fusion, but there may be advantages to the more rigid support offered by an anterior threaded rod. METHODS: Pure-moment flexibility testing was performed on L3-S1 cadaveric specimens in 4 conditions: (1) Intact, (2) L5-S1 pedicle screws (PS) + L5-S1 disc destabilization (DDS), (3) TLIF at L5-S1 + PS + DDS, and (4) AxialITR at L5-S1 + PS + DDS. Specimens were destabilized by performing a complete denucleation at L5-S1 and sectioning two-thirds of the annulus' width from anterior to posterior. The S1 PSs were instrumented with strain gauges to measure screw-bending moments and ROM was quantified with a noncontact camera system. RESULTS: S1 screw strains were highest with PS but were significantly reduced by 73% in flexion and 31% in extension with TLIF (P ≤ 0.004). AxialITR significantly reduced strain by 78% in flexion and 81% in extension (P ≤ 0.001). ROM was smallest with AxialITR in each test direction at 1.7 ± 1.8° in flexion-extension, 1.6 ± 0.9° in lateral bending and 1.3 ± 0.8° in torsion. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ROM and S1 screw-bending moments were reduced with the use of AxialITR and TLIF. Although the TLIF and AxialITR both reduced strains and motion, the AxialITR provided a significant reduction in extension strain when compared with TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Compressive properties of fibrous repair tissue compared to nucleus and annulus.

The wound healing process includes filling the void between implant and tissue edges by collagenous connective repair tissue. This fibrous repair tissue may load share or stabilize implants such as spinal disc replacements. The objective of this study was the biomechanical characterization of human fibrous tissue compared to annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. Human lumbar discs (10 nucleus and annulus) and 10 lumbar deep wound fibrous tissue specimens were sectioned into 12mm diameter×6mm high cylindrical samples. Confined compression testing, after 2h swelling at 0.11MPa, was performed at 5%, 10% and 15% strain over 3.5h. Unconfined dynamic testing (2-0.001Hz) was performed at 5-15% strain. Semi-quantitative histology estimated the proportion of proteoglycan to collagen. Fibrous tissue exhibited a decrease in height during the swelling period whereas annulus and nucleus tissues did not. The aggregate modulus was significantly less for fibrous tissue (p<0.002). Percent stress relaxation was greatest for the fibrous tissue and similar for annulus and nucleus. Dynamic testing found the storage modulus (E') was greater than the loss modulus (E″) for all tissues. Annulus were found to have greater E' and E″ than nucleus, whereas E' and E″ were similar between annulus and fibrous tissue. Fibrous tissue had the greatest increase in both moduli at greater frequencies, but had the lowest hydration and proteoglycan content. Fibrous tissue would not be a substitute for native tissue within the disc space but if adjacent to a disc prosthesis may impart some degree of intersegmental stability during acute loading activities.

Randomized trial of physician alerts for thromboprophylaxis after discharge.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized Medical Service patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism in the months after discharge. We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to test whether a hospital staff member's thromboprophylaxis alert to an Attending Physician before discharge will increase the rate of extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis and, in turn, reduce the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism at 90 days. METHODS: From April 2009 to January 2010, we enrolled hospitalized Medical Service patients using the point score system developed by Kucher et al to identify those at high risk for venous thromboembolism who were not ordered to receive thromboprophylaxis after discharge. There were 2513 eligible patients from 18 study sites randomized by computer in a 1:1 ratio to the alert group or the control group. RESULTS: Patients in the alert group were more than twice as likely to receive thromboprophylaxis at discharge as controls (22.0% vs 9.7%, P <.0001). Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, symptomatic venous thromboembolism at 90 days (99.9% follow-up) occurred in 4.5% of patients in the alert group, compared with 4.0% of controls (hazard ratio 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.69). The rate of major bleeding at 30 days in the alert group was similar to that of the control group (1.2% vs 1.2%, hazard ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Alerting providers to extend thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge in Medical Service patients increased the rate of prophylaxis but did not decrease the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Validation of an improved method to calculate the orientation and magnitude of pedicle screw bending moments.

Previous methods of pedicle screw strain measurement have utilized complex, time consuming methods of strain gauge application, experience high failure rates, do not effectively measure resultant bending moments, and cannot predict moment orientation. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to validate an improved method of quantifying pedicle screw bending moment orientation and magnitude. Pedicle screws were instrumented to measure biplanar screw bending moments by positioning four strain gauges on flat, machined surfaces below the screw head. Screws were calibrated to measure bending moments by hanging certified weights a known distance from the strain gauges. Loads were applied in 30 deg increments at 12 different angles while recording data from two independent strain channels. The data were then analyzed to calculate the predicted orientation and magnitude of the resultant bending moment. Finally, flexibility tests were performed on a cadaveric motion segment implanted with the instrumented screws to demonstrate the implementation of this technique. The difference between the applied and calculated orientation of the bending moments averaged (±standard error of the mean (SEM)) 0.3 ± 0.1 deg across the four screws for all rotations and loading conditions. The calculated resultant bending moments deviated from the actual magnitudes by an average of 0.00 ± 0.00 Nm for all loading conditions. During cadaveric testing, the bending moment orientations were medial/lateral in flexion-extension, variable in lateral bending, and diagonal in axial torsion. The technique developed in this study provides an accurate method of calculating the orientation and magnitude of screw bending moments and can be utilized with any pedicle screw fixation system.

Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.

STUDY DESIGN: A cadaveric biomechanical experiment was conducted to assess the range of motion (ROM) and screw strain at S1 in a long instrumented spinal fusion construct to compare the effects of various surgical strategies for L5-S1 stabilization. OBJECTIVE: To directly quantify and compare S1 screw strains and lumbosacral ROM for 4 different L2-S1 posterior segmental instrumented fusion constructs: an L2-S1 pedicle screw (PS) construct alone and PS with each of 3 different augmentations, anterior lumbar intebody fusion (ALIF), anterior axial interbody threaded rod (AxiaLITR), or iliac screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Iliac screws and anterior interbody devices are commonly used as augmentation to reduce the incidence of S1 screw loosening in long fusion constructs. Alternatives, such as AxiaLITR, may provide similar biomechanical advantages without many of the same long-term limitations and morbidities. METHODS: Pure moment flexibility testing was performed in 6 cadaveric lumbosacral spines. Specimens were tested with 4 instrumentation constructs: (1) PS L2-S1, (2) PS with ALIF, (3) PS with AxiaLITR, and (4) PS with iliac screws. Bilateral S1 PS were instrumented with strain gauges, directly measuring screw loading while simultaneously measuring L5-S1 ROM with a noncontact camera system. RESULTS: Average S1 screw strains were the greatest with the PS group and were reduced by 38% with the ALIF group, 75% with the AxiaLITR group, and 78% with the iliac screw group in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in torsion (P < 0.05). Strains in lateral bending were smaller in magnitude and were similar among all 4 constructs. The AxiaLITR and iliac screw groups demonstrated a similar ROM and significant reduction in ROM at L5-S1 compared with both the PS and ALIF groups (P ≤ 0.02 and P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicated that iliac screws and AxiaLITR provide similar stability at L5-S1, while significantly reducing the strain on the S1 screws.

Inter-laboratory variability in in vitro spinal segment flexibility testing.

In vitro spine flexibility testing has been performed using a variety of laboratory-specific loading apparatuses and conditions, making test results across laboratories difficult to compare. The application of pure moments has been well established for spine flexibility testing, but to our knowledge there have been no attempts to quantify differences in range of motion (ROM) resulting from laboratory-specific loading apparatuses. Seven fresh-frozen lumbar cadaveric motion segments were tested intact at four independent laboratories. Unconstrained pure moments of 7.5 Nm were applied in each anatomic plane without an axial preload. At laboratories A and B, pure moments were applied using hydraulically actuated spinal loading fixtures with either a passive (A) or controlled (B) XY table. At laboratories C and D, pure moments were applied using a sliding (C) or fixed ring (D) cable-pulley system with a servohydraulic test frame. Three sinusoidal load-unload cycles were applied at laboratories A and B while a single quasistatic cycle was applied in 1.5 Nm increments at laboratories C and D. Non-contact motion measurement systems were used to quantify ROM. In all test directions, the ROM variability among donors was greater than single-donor ROM variability among laboratories. The maximum difference in average ROM between any two laboratories was 1.5° in flexion-extension, 1.3° in lateral bending and 1.1° in axial torsion. This was the first study to quantify ROM in a single group of spinal motion segments at four independent laboratories with varying pure moment systems. These data support our hypothesis that given a well-described test method, independent laboratories can produce similar biomechanical outcomes.

Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture: do screw quantity and locked, interlocking screws make a difference?

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the fatigue life of nailed proximal third tibial fractures stabilized with either three or four proximal screws using commercially available nails with both locked (through threaded holes or end caps) and nonlocked proximal interlocking screw configurations. METHODS: Eight paired and two independent tibiae of known bone mineral density were acquired, divided into three groups, and implanted with three different commercially available nails (n = 6/group). Nails were all 10 mm in diameter and individually sized for length. Individual tibiae from a given pair received different nails. Based on nail design, Nail A received four proximal screws (three that lock into the nail), whereas Nails B and C each received three proximal nonlocking screws. Standard end caps were used with all nails. As a result of its design, in Nail B, the most proximal interlocking screw was "locked" by the nail end cap. All nails used two distal screws. After implantation, an unstable proximal third fracture was created and specimens were tested with combined axial and torsional loads of 40 to 400 N and 0.11 to 1.1 Nm for 500,000 cycles or until failure. RESULTS: The fatigue life of Group A was significantly greater than either Groups B or C (P < 0.001 in both cases) with a mean cycle to failure of 392,977 versus 86,476 and 64,595 cycles for Nails B and C, respectively. Fatigue life of Group A was greater or equivalent to all contralateral tibiae; Group B outlasted all contralateral Group C limbs and the Group C constructs did not outlast any contralateral limbs. Bone mineral density correlated positively and significantly with fatigue life across all three groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, proximal segment stability was improved with a greater quantity of screws and with locked interlocking screws.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in obesity.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Where appropriate, evidence-based methods of prophylaxis are implemented and the burden of VTE can be reduced substantially. Obesity, including morbid obesity, is associated with a high risk of VTE and, unfortunately, fixed doses of US FDA-approved anticoagulant regimens, including unfractionated heparins, low-molecular-weight heparins and factor Xa inhibitors, may not provide optimal VTE prophylaxis in these patients. Although the data are still limited, a rapidly growing body of literature and cumulative evidence suggests that anticoagulant dose adjustments in morbidly obese patients may optimize pharmacodynamic activity and reduce VTE risk. With the prevalence of morbid obesity continuing to rise, more high-quality clinical data are needed to better understand the pathobiology of VTE in obesity and provide effective, yet safe, prevention strategies.

In vitro biomechanics of an expandable vertebral body replacement with self-adjusting end plates.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine may be treated surgically. Vertebral body replacements (VBRs) give anterior column support and, when used with supplemental fixation, impart rigidity to the injured segments. Although some VBRs are expandable, device congruity to the vertebral end plates is imprecise and may lead to stress risers and device subsidence. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the rigidity of a VBR that self-adjusts to the adjacent vertebral end plates versus structural bone allograft and with an unsupported anterior column in a traumatic burst fracture reconstruction model. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical flexibility testing with rod strain measurement. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve T11-L3 human spine segments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Range of motion, neutral zone, and posterior fixation rod stress (moments). METHODS: Flexibility testing was performed to ± 6 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation on 12 intact human T11-L3 specimens. Burst fractures were created in L1, and flexibility testing was repeated in three additional states: subtotal corpectomy with posterior instrumentation (PI) only from T12 to L2, reconstruction with a femoral strut allograft and PI, and reconstruction with a VBR (with self-adjusting end plates) and PI. The PI consisted of pedicle screws and strain gage instrumented rods that were calibrated to measure rod stress via flexion-extension bending moments. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in range of motion or neutral zone between the strut graft and VBR constructs, which both had less motion than the PI-only construct in flexion/extension and torsion and were both less than the intact values in flexion/extension and lateral bending (p < .05). Posterior rod moments were significantly greater for the PI-only construct in flexion/extension relative to the strut graft and VBR states (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study, which simulated the immediate postoperative state, suggests that a VBR with self-adjusting end plate components has rigidity similar to the standard strut graft when combined with PI. Posterior rod stress was not significantly increased with this type of VBR compared with the strut graft reconstruction. The benefits of burst fracture stabilization using a self-adjusting VBR ultimately will not be known until long-term clinical studies are performed.

How much do locked screws add to the fixation of "hybrid" plate constructs in osteoporotic bone?

BACKGROUND: Hybrid locked plating has become a commonly used technique for treating complex fractures and nonunions, but information is lacking to direct the specific application of this fixation method. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the number and location of locked screws on the mechanical properties of hybrid plate constructs in an osteoporotic bone model. METHODS: A synthetic commercial composite model of osteoporotic bone with a 5-mm simulated fracture gap was fixed with a 12-hole plate. Seven different constructs (n=5/construct) were tested including 2 unlocked and 5 hybrid configurations. All constructs used bicortical screws tightened to 4 N.m torque. Cyclic (sinusoidal) testing was performed with a peak torsional load of +/-8 N.m for 100,000 cycles. Torsional stiffness of each construct was measured in 10,000 cycle increments, and the maximum removal torque of each screw was measured at the conclusion of torsional testing. RESULTS: Stiffness of the constructs at each testing interval was most affected by the number of screws; stiffness increased at least 33% when 4 screws were used on each side of the fracture versus 3 per side. Among the constructs with 4 screws in each fragment, no difference was observed when 1 or 2 unlocked screws were replaced with locked screws on each side of the simulated fracture. In contrast, replacement of 3 unlocked screws with locked screws increased the torsional stiffness of the construct by another 24% (P<0.001). Compared with baseline (pretesting) values, postcycling screw removal torque was similar for locked screws at all positions (average 50% of peak removal), but removal torque of unlocked screws furthest from the fracture was increased by 274% if they were placed immediately adjacent to a locked screw (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At least 3 bicortical locked screws on each side of a fracture are needed to increase the torsional stiffness in an osteoporotic bone model. Locked screws placed between the fracture and unlocked screws protect the unlocked screws from loosening and may have some clinical utility in improving fatigue life of the construct. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical level 1.