Labral Ossification and Sacroiliac Joint Disease: Could There Be a Link to an Autoimmune Etiology?

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of ipsilateral sacroiliac (SI) joint disease among patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) associated with labral ossification (LO) who underwent hip arthroscopy compared with a matched control group of patients with symptomatic FAI and no LO. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of all patients undergoing arthroscopic correction of FAI were obtained. The inclusion criterion for the study group was a diagnosis of FAI with a secondary diagnosis of LO made by plain radiography, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging or made intraoperatively. The exclusion criterion was the absence of evidence of LO. We reviewed 52 patients (56 hips) with LO to assess the SI joint and compared them with a control group matched by age, sex, and FAI type. The SI joints were graded according to the modified New York criteria. RESULTS: CT scans were available for evaluation of the ipsilateral SI joint in 28 patients (29 hips) with LO: 17 women and 11 men with an average age of 44.6 years (range, 26-56 years). Of the hips, 23 had combined FAI and 6 had pincer-type FAI. The control group consisted of 29 hips, exactly matched for sex and FAI type, with an average age of 44.8 years (range, 21-58 years). Grade 3 SI joint abnormalities were significantly more prevalent in the LO group (28%) than in the control group (7%, P = .037), and grade 0 or 1 changes (relatively normal SI joints) were significantly less common in patients with LO (38%) than in controls (72%, P = .008). Subanalysis showed that 35% of the LO group aged 45 years or younger had ipsilateral grade 3 SI joint abnormalities compared with none of the control patients aged 45 years or younger (P = .041). Grade 3 changes were found in 42% of male patients with LO compared with 8% of male controls (P = .155). Grade 3 changes were noted in 18% of women in the LO group compared with 6% of female controls (P = .601). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic FAI and LO are more likely to show associated SI joint pathology than patients with FAI not involving LO. These differences are greatest among men and among patients aged 45 years or younger. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Surgical Outcome of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement With and Without Labral Ossification.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical findings associated with labral ossification (LO), report the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment, and compare this condition to a control group with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS: A retrospective review of hip arthroscopy patients from 2004 to 2013 was performed to identify patients with a diagnosis of pincer FAI with LO and at least 2 years of follow-up. Diagnosis was made by plain radiograph, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or intraoperatively. The LO cohort was compared to a chronologically matched control group of FAI patients with pincer FAI but no LO. Patients were prospectively assessed with modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) preoperatively and then postoperatively at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 120 months. RESULTS: The LO group included 56 hips in 52 patients whereas the control group included 56 hips in 56 patients. Mean follow-up was 36 months for the LO group and 38 for the control group (P = .28). Patients in the LO group were older than those in the control group, with a mean age of 45 versus 30 years (P < .0001), and had more women: 58% female versus 32% male (P < .0001). The LO group patients were more likely to have pain while sitting (65% v 18%) and restricted activities of daily living (40% v 11%) than the control group (P < .0001), and more likely to have pain during a flexion, abduction, external rotation (FABER) test (67% v 36%) (P = .002). Both groups experienced a similar magnitude of improvement in mHHS, but the LO group had a significantly lower preoperative mHHS (49 v 63, P < .001) and final postoperative mHHS (75 v 87, P < .0001) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LO represent a unique subset of pincer FAI and are more likely to be older, female, and have more severe symptoms. Hip arthroscopy can be used to treat LO with excision of the ossified fragments or rim, with a reasonable expectation of improvement of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective case-control.

Hip preservation surgery: surgical care for femoroacetabular impingement and the possibility of preventing hip osteoarthritis.

Despite its widespread usage, the hip preservation surgery can be most accurately described as a hypothesis that surgery can preserve a hip and prevent the need for arthroplasty. This premise has not been fully investigated to date, and there exist few summaries of the underlying evidence in regard to the basis of this terminology. This study seeks to define the hip preservation surgery, and then examines this premise critically in the context of treatment for its most commonly treated condition-femoroacetabular impingement. Finally, we report the current level of preservation of the hip that can be expected with current techniques.

Hip arthroscopy for Legg-Calvè-Perthes disease: minimum 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the results of arthroscopy for the treatment of adolescents and adults with hip pain cause by sequelae of Legg-Calvè-Perthes disease. METHODS: All patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were prospectively assessed with the modified Harris Hip Score at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60, 120, and 180 months. We identified a cohort of 22 consecutive patients (23 hips) with Legg-Calvè-Perthes disease who had undergone arthroscopy with at least 2-year follow-up; this cohort represents the substance of this report. RESULTS: There was 100% follow-up at 24 months (range, 24 to 180 months). The median age was 27 years (range, 7 to 58 years) with 14 male and 8 female patients. Findings during arthroscopy included 18 labral tears, 17 hypertrophic or torn ligamentum teres, 9 femoral and 8 acetabular chondral lesions, 5 loose bodies, 3 osteochondral defects, and 2 cam lesions. The mean improvement at 24 months was 28 points (56.7 preoperatively and 82 postoperatively). All patients were improved, although this improvement was negligible in 2 patients who underwent repeat arthroscopy. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: This series reports the results of arthroscopy for Legg-Calvè-Perthes disease and reflects that it does have a role in the management of painful sequelae. Successful outcomes can often be expected with minimal morbidity. Reduced symptoms and improved quality of life are reasonable expectations, although these data do not suggest that hip arthroscopy alters the natural history of the disease process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available regarding the results of nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures. The present study was designed to assess the outcomes associated with unrepaired distal biceps tendon ruptures. METHODS: Eighteen patients with twenty unrepaired distal biceps tendon ruptures were assessed retrospectively. The median duration of follow-up was thirty-eight months. Sixteen of the eighteen patients were male, and the median age at the time of the injury was fifty years (range, thirty-five to seventy-four years). Supination strength and elbow flexion strength were measured bilaterally, and patient outcomes were assessed with use of the Broberg and Morrey Functional Rating Index, the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. Data were compared with historical controls compiled from six published series of operatively treated patients. RESULTS: The median supination and elbow flexion strengths for the injured arm were 63% (mean, 74%; range, 33% to 162%) and 93% (mean, 88%; range, 58% to 110%) of those for the contralateral arm, compared with values of 92% (mean, 101%; range, 42% to 297%) and 95% (mean, 97%; range, 53% to 191%) for the historical controls that had been treated surgically. The difference between the mean values was significant for supination strength (p = 0.002) but not for flexion strength (p = 0.164). Patients had satisfactory outcomes overall, with median scores on the Broberg and Morrey Functional Rating Index, the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire of 85, 95, and 9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures can yield acceptable outcomes with modestly reduced strength, especially supination.