The HIV Environmental Riskscape: The Roles of HIV Sexual Risk and Resilience Factors among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: Findings from the Real Talk Project.

Black and African American men who have sex with men (Black MSM) experience the greatest proportion of new HIV infections in the United States. To address this challenge, a better understanding of the HIV environment riskscape including both risk and resilience factors is warranted among Black MSM. Research indicates that stress is associated with increased HIV sexual risk behaviors. Further, behavioral factors such as serosorting and community level factors including social support and community connection are resilience factors that protect against risk behaviors. The present study examines whether everyday stress is associated with HIV sexual risk behavior, as well as the role of risk and resilience factors among 125 Black MSM recruited in the Real Talk study. The Real Talk project examined the relationships between resilience, HIV risk behaviors, and HIV prevention strategy among a sample of Black MSM. Using generalized estimating equations, our results indicate a positive association between everyday stress and engaging in condomless anal intercourse only after adjusting for risk, resilience, and correlate variables. Similarly, having multiple sex partners and using substances during sex also show positive associations with condomless anal intercourse. Resilience factors of engaging in serosorting and being connected to both the Black and gay communities were negatively associated with condomless anal intercourse. Future prevention research and programming should focus on both risk and resilience factors to mitigate new HIV infections among Black MSM.

The Impact of a One-Day Workshop on Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence validating the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in youth, specifically showing persistence of BPD symptoms and morbidity similar to adults, there is reluctance to diagnose this in teens. Further, there is a belief among many trainees and academic child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) that only specialty programs are effective, leading to treatment delays. This study charts the impact of a full-day workshop offered to an entire academic CAP department. METHODS: A Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder in-person workshop was offered to department members. Participants were asked to complete a pre-survey, an immediate post-training survey, and a survey at 6 months post-training. Utilizing a Qualtrics questionnaire, both linear mixed-effect models and paired t-tests were used to estimate the immediate and sustained effects of the training. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants completed the workshop, with 31 answering the pre-survey, 27 the post-training survey, and 23 the 6-month follow-up survey. Immediately after the training and 6 months later, participants demonstrated statistically significant (p < .05) improvements in willingness to disclose the diagnosis of BPD, a reduced negative attitude around BPD, and an enhanced sense of confidence in addressing the needs of adolescents with BPD. CONCLUSIONS: GPM-A training can make a positive impact on groups of clinicians who work with youth who meet criteria for BPD, specifically reducing stigma, encouraging trainees and faculty members to make the diagnosis more readily, and helping them feel more competent in addressing the treatment needs of adolescents with BPD.