The role of post-translational modifications in hearing and deafness.

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are key molecular events that modify proteins after their synthesis and modulate their ultimate functional properties by affecting their stability, localisation, interaction potential or activity. These chemical changes expand the size of the proteome adding diversity to the molecular pathways governing the biological outcome of cells. PTMs are, thus, crucial in regulating a variety of cellular processes such as apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation and have been shown to be instrumental during embryonic development. In addition, alterations in protein PTMs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many human diseases, including deafness. In this review, we summarize the recent progress made in understanding the roles of PTMs during cochlear development, with particular emphasis on the enzymes driving protein phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination and SUMOylation. We also discuss how these enzymes may contribute to hearing impairment and deafness.

Molecular cloning and functional characterisation of chicken Atonal homologue 1: a comparison with human Atoh1.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The vertebrate basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Atoh1 is essential for maturation and survival of mechanosensory hair cells of the inner ear, neurogenesis, differentiation of the intestine, homeostasis of the colon and is implicated in cancer progression. Given that mutations in Atoh1 are detected in malignant tumours, study of functionally different Atoh1 alleles and homologues might yield useful avenues for investigation. The predicted sequence of chicken Atoh1 (cAtoh1) has large regions of dissimilarity to that of mammalian Atoh1 homologues. We hypothesise that cAtoh1 might have intrinsic functional differences to mammalian Atoh1. RESULTS: In this study, we cloned and sequenced the full open reading frame of cAtoh1. In overexpression experiments, we show that this sequence is sufficient to generate a cAtoh1 protein capable of inducing hair cell markers when expressed in nonsensory regions of the developing inner ear, and that morpholino-mediated knock-down using a section of the sequence 5' to the start codon inhibits differentiation of hair cells in the chicken basilar papilla. Furthermore, we compare the behaviour of cAtoh1 and human Atoh1 (hAtoh1) in embryonic mouse cochlear explants, showing that cAtoh1 is a potent inducer of hair cell differentiation and that it can overcome Sox2-mediated repression of hair cell differentiation more effectively than hAtoh1. CONCLUSIONS: cAtoh1 is both necessary and sufficient for avian mechanosensory hair cell differentiation. The non-conserved regions of the cAtoh1 coding region have functional consequences on its behaviour.

Expression of the heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatases, Sulf1 and Sulf2, in the avian and mammalian inner ear suggests a role for sulfation during inner ear development.

BACKGROUND: Inner ear morphogenesis is tightly regulated by the temporally and spatially coordinated action of signaling ligands and their receptors. Ligand-receptor interactions are influenced by heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), cell surface molecules that consist of glycosaminoglycan chains bound to a protein core. Diversity in the sulfation pattern within glycosaminoglycan chains creates binding sites for numerous cell signaling factors, whose activities and distribution are modified by their association with HSPGs. RESULTS: Here we describe the expression patterns of two extracellular 6-O-endosulfatases, Sulf1 and Sulf2, whose activity modifies the 6-O-sulfation pattern of HSPGs. We use in situ hybridization to determine the temporal and spatial distribution of transcripts during the development of the chick and mouse inner ear. We also use immunocytochemistry to determine the cellular localization of Sulf1 and Sulf2 within the sensory epithelia. Furthermore, we analyze the organ of Corti in Sulf1/Sulf2 double knockout mice and describe an increase in the number of mechanosensory hair cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the tuning of intracellular signaling, mediated by Sulf activity, plays an important role in the development of the inner ear.

From placode to labyrinth: culture of the chicken inner ear.

The inner ear transduces the mechanical stimuli that are associated with sound and balance perception. Missteps during its formation often result in deafness, and thus understanding otic development has a profound clinical relevance. The intricate complexity of the inner ear is derived from a simple epithelial sheet during embryogenesis. Study of this process in vitro has provided insight into the mechanisms of otic induction, patterning and differentiation. This article details methods for the culture of otic placode, otocyst, and basilar papilla, providing a toolkit for the investigation of multiple facets of otic organogenesis, for regeneration studies and for setting up small molecule screens to identify possible therapeutic targets.

Artificial induction of Sox21 regulates sensory cell formation in the embryonic chicken inner ear.

During embryonic development, hair cells and support cells in the sensory epithelia of the inner ear derive from progenitors that express Sox2, a member of the SoxB1 family of transcription factors. Sox2 is essential for sensory specification, but high levels of Sox2 expression appear to inhibit hair cell differentiation, suggesting that factors regulating Sox2 activity could be critical for both processes. Antagonistic interactions between SoxB1 and SoxB2 factors are known to regulate cell differentiation in neural tissue, which led us to investigate the potential roles of the SoxB2 member Sox21 during chicken inner ear development. Sox21 is normally expressed by sensory progenitors within vestibular and auditory regions of the early embryonic chicken inner ear. At later stages, Sox21 is differentially expressed in the vestibular and auditory organs. Sox21 is restricted to the support cell layer of the auditory epithelium, while it is enriched in the hair cell layer of the vestibular organs. To test Sox21 function, we used two temporally distinct gain-of-function approaches. Sustained over-expression of Sox21 from early developmental stages prevented prosensory specification, and abolished the formation of both hair cells and support cells. However, later induction of Sox21 expression at the time of hair cell formation in organotypic cultures of vestibular epithelia inhibited endogenous Sox2 expression and Notch activity, and biased progenitor cells towards a hair cell fate. Interestingly, Sox21 did not promote hair cell differentiation in the immature auditory epithelium, which fits with the expression of endogenous Sox21 within mature support cells in this tissue. These results suggest that interactions among endogenous SoxB family transcription factors may regulate sensory cell formation in the inner ear, but in a context-dependent manner.

Extracellular regulation of developmental cell signaling by XtSulf1.

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are synthesised and modified in the Golgi before they are presented at the cell surface. Modifications include the addition of sulfate groups at specific positions on sugar residues along the heparan sulfate (HS) chain which results in a structural heterogeneity that underpins the ability of HSPGs to bind with high affinity to many different proteins, including growth factors and their receptors. Sulf1 codes for a 6-0-endosulfatase that is present and active extracellularly, providing a further mechanism to generate structural diversity through the post-synthetic remodelling of HS. Here we use Xenopus embryos to demonstrate in vivo that Xtsulf1 plays an important role in modulating cell signaling during development. We show that while XtSulf1 can enhance the axis-inducing activity of Wnt11, XtSulf1 acts during embryogenesis to restrict BMP and FGF signaling.

QSulf1, a heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase, inhibits fibroblast growth factor signaling in mesoderm induction and angiogenesis.

The signaling activities of multiple developmental ligands require sulfated heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans as coreceptors. QSulf1 and its mammalian orthologs are cell surface HS 6-O-endosulfatases that are expressed in embryonic mesodermal and neural progenitors and promote Wnt signal transduction. In this study, we have investigated the function of QSulf1 in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling, which requires 6-O-sulfated HS for FGF receptor (FGFR) dimerization and tyrosine kinase activation. Here, we report that QSulf1 inhibits FGF2- and FGF4-induced mesoderm formation in the Xenopus embryo and FGF-dependent angiogenesis in the chicken embryo through 6-O-desulfation of cell surface HS. QSulf1 regulates FGF signaling through inhibition of HS-mediated FGFR1 activation by interfering with FGF-HS-FGFR1 ternary complex formation. Furthermore, QSulf1 can produce enzymatically modified soluble heparin that acts as a potent inhibitor of FGF2-induced angiogenesis in the chicken embryo. QSulf1, therefore, has dual regulatory functions as a negative regulator of FGF signaling and a positive regulator of Wnt signaling. Therefore, QSulf1 provides another reagent to produce enzymatically modified heparin compounds, in vivo and in vitro, to modulate cellular signaling in stem cell-based therapies to promote tissue regeneration and in cancer therapies to control cell growth and block angiogenesis.