Particulate and gaseous air pollutants exceed WHO guideline values and have the potential to damage human health in Faisalabad, Metropolitan, Pakistan.

First-ever measurements of particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10, and TSP) along with gaseous pollutants (CO, NO2, and SO2) were performed from June 2019 to April 2020 in Faisalabad, Metropolitan, Pakistan, to assess their seasonal variations; Summer 2019, Autumn 2019, Winter 2019-2020, and Spring 2020. Pollutant measurements were carried out at 30 locations with a 3-km grid distance from the Sitara Chemical Industry in District Faisalabad to Bhianwala, Sargodha Road, Tehsil Lalian, District Chiniot. ArcGIS 10.8 was used to interpolate pollutant concentrations using the inverse distance weightage method. PM2.5, PM10, and TSP concentrations were highest in summer, and lowest in autumn or winter. CO, NO2, and SO2 concentrations were highest in summer or spring and lowest in winter. Seasonal average NO2 and SO2 concentrations exceeded WHO annual air quality guide values. For all 4 seasons, some sites had better air quality than others. Even in these cleaner sites air quality index (AQI) was unhealthy for sensitive groups and the less good sites showed Very critical AQI (> 500). Dust-bound carbon and sulfur contents were higher in spring (64 mg g-1) and summer (1.17 mg g-1) and lower in autumn (55 mg g-1) and winter (1.08 mg g-1). Venous blood analysis of 20 individuals showed cadmium and lead concentrations higher than WHO permissible limits. Those individuals exposed to direct roadside pollution for longer periods because of their occupation tended to show higher Pb and Cd blood concentrations. It is concluded that air quality along the roadside is extremely poor and potentially damaging to the health of exposed workers.

The land use impacts of forestry and agricultural systems relative to natural vegetation; a fundamental energy dissipation approach.

In agriculture and forestry the land use impacts that occur during production are important; including as necessary inputs for life cycle assessments. There are major differences in land use impacts between different forest management approaches and, in future, those forestry systems which deliver ecosystem services while having lower adverse land use impacts will be of greater value. Here we examine the land use impacts of seven contrasting forest management approaches and agricultural cropping systems at five locations in Europe. Comprehensive management data were used to calculate land use impacts in an evaluation system based on ecosystem thermodynamics. This approach has a number of advantages, including that it is suitable for input to life cycle assessment. This is the first time this approach has been used at a number of agricultural and forestry sites. We show that agriculture tends to have higher land use impacts than forestry. Those forestry systems that are more intensively managed in shorter rotations have larger land use impacts when calculated for the entire rotation, but this is not the case when land use impact is calculated on the basis of production unit. These findings support the use of landscape mosaics with some high production areas and will be of increasingly significance as we seek to achieve economic growth without environmental degradation. That managed forests have relatively low land use impacts has important implications for forestry restoration and climate mitigation programmes, including the forestry components of Nationally Determined Contributions under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The sustainable management and protection of forests: analysis of the current position globally.

The loss of forest area globally due to change of land use, the importance of forests in the conservation of biodiversity and in carbon and other biogeochemical cycles, together with the threat to forests from pollution and from the impacts of climate change, place forestry policy and practice at the center of global environmental and sustainability strategy. Forests provide important economic, environmental, social, and cultural benefits, so that in forestry, as in other areas of environmental policy and management, there are tensions between economic development and environmental protection. In this article we review the current information on global forest cover and condition, examine the international processes that relate to forest protection and to sustainable forest management, and look at the main forest certification schemes. We consider the link between the international processes and certification schemes and also their combined effectiveness. We conclude that in some regions of the world neither mechanism is achieving forest protection, while in others local or regional implementation is occurring and is having a significant impact. Choice of certification scheme and implementation of management standards are often influenced by a consideration of the associated costs, and there are some major issues over the monitoring of agreed actions and of the criteria and indicators of sustainability. There are currently a number of initiatives seeking to improve the operation of the international forestry framework (e.g., The Montreal Process, the Ministerial Convention of the Protection of Forests in Europe and European Union actions in Europe, the African Timber Organisation and International Tropical Timber Organisation initiative for African tropical forest, and the development of a worldwide voluntary agreement on forestry in the United Nations Forum on Forests). We suggest that there is a need to improve the connections between scientific understanding, policy development, and forestry practice, and also the cooperation between the various international initiatives and processes, so that the international framework is more effective and its influence is extended geographically.

Elevated CO2 protects poplar (Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides) from damage induced by O3: identification of mechanisms.

CO2 concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere will rise to between 550 and 700 µL L-1 by 2100 (IPCC 2001). In much of the world, ozone (O3) is the air pollutant most likely to be having adverse effects on the growth of plants. Here we describe the impacts of CO2 and O3 episodes (rising to 100 nL L-1), singly and in mixtures on the growth and physiology of an interamerican hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa L. (Torr. & Gray ex Hook.) × P. deltoids Bartr. ex Marsh). 700 µL L-1 CO2 increased all growth variables relative to values in 350 µL L-1. Mainstem dry weight showed a 38% increase in year 1 and a 32% increase in year 2. Ozone episodes reduced mainstem dry mass by 45% in 350 µL L-1 CO2 and by 34% in 700 µL L-1 CO2. A / Ci analysis showed limited effects on photosynthetic efficiency of 700 µL L-1 CO2 but in contrast, Vcmax was reduced by O3 episodes. CO2 tended to increase leaf expansion but O3 episodes reduced expansion rates generally although a short period of increased leaf expansion in response to O3 was also observed. O3 reduced leaf solute potentials (Ψs) and increased turgor (P) in young leaves. Cell wall properties (elasticity and plasticity) were both stimulated by ozone and this was associated with increased leaf expansion. A new mechanism is proposed which suggests that O3 may act directly on the cell wall, attacking polysaccharides in the wall that result in altered cell wall properties and leaf growth. O3 episodes increased leaf loss, elevated CO2 delayed abscission and O3 was less effective at accelerating leaf loss in elevated CO2. Overall CO2 increased growth, O3 caused decreases and the treatment combination gave intermediate effects. Thus O3 episodes are less likely to be detrimental to P. trichocarpa × P. deltoides in the CO2 concentrations of the future.