Predictors of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in primary-care settings.

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) due to Staphylococcus aureus have become increasingly common in the outpatient setting; however, risk factors for differentiating methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) SSTIs are needed to better inform antibiotic treatment decisions. We performed a case-case-control study within 14 primary-care clinics in South Texas from 2007 to 2015. Overall, 325 patients [S. aureus SSTI cases (case group 1, n = 175); MRSA SSTI cases (case group 2, n = 115); MSSA SSTI cases (case group 3, n = 60); uninfected control group (control, n = 150)] were evaluated. Each case group was compared to the control group, and then qualitatively contrasted to identify unique risk factors associated with S. aureus, MRSA, and MSSA SSTIs. Overall, prior SSTIs [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7·60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3·31-17·45], male gender (aOR 1·74, 95% CI 1·06-2·85), and absence of healthcare occupation status (aOR 0·14, 95% CI 0·03-0·68) were independently associated with S. aureus SSTIs. The only unique risk factor for community-associated (CA)-MRSA SSTIs was a high body weight (⩾110 kg) (aOR 2·03, 95% CI 1·01-4·09).

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection in MRSA-colonized patients discharged from a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Currently, limited studies have quantified the risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) for MRSA-colonized patients on discharge from hospital. Our retrospective, case-control study identified independent risk factors for the development of MRSA SSTIs among such patients detected by active MRSA nasal screening in an acute care hospital by PCR on admission, and bacteriological cultures on discharge. Cases were MRSA-colonized patients aged ⩾18 years who developed a MRSA SSTI post-discharge and controls were those who did not develop a MRSA SSTI post-discharge. Controls were matched to cases by length of follow-up (±10 days) for up to 18 months. Potential demographic and clinical risk factors for MRSA infection were identified using electronic queries and manual chart abstraction; data were compared by standard statistical tests and variables with P values ⩽0·05 in bivariable analysis were entered into a logistic regression model. Multivariable analysis demonstrated prior hospital admission within 12 months (P = 0·02), prior MRSA infection (P = 0·05), and previous myocardial infarction (P = 0·01) were independently predictive of a MRSA SSTI post-discharge. Identification of MRSA colonization upon admission and recognition of risk factors could help identify a high-risk population that could benefit from MRSA SSTI prevention strategies.

Impact of empiric weight-based vancomycin dosing on nephrotoxicity and mortality in geriatric patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated the effect of vancomycin dosing on the health outcomes in geriatric patients. Data are needed to determine whether higher vancomycin dosing strategies are more effective in geriatric patients and/or lead to excessive rates of adverse events. METHODS: This study used a subset of patients aged ≥65 years from a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. Patients received ≥ 48 h of empiric vancomycin between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2008. We compared the incidence of nephrotoxicity and in-hospital mortality in patients who received guideline-recommended dosing (at least 15 mg/kg/dose) to patients who received lower dosing. Multivariable generalized mixed-effect models were constructed to determine independent risk factors for nephrotoxicity and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Half of the cohort (46% of 92 patients) received guideline-recommended dosing. Empiric use of weight-based dosing did increase the percentage of patients achieving a vancomycin trough ≥ 15 mg/L (57% vs. 42%). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 32% of patients and 26% died during their hospitalization. Guideline-recommended dosing was not associated with significant changes in nephrotoxicity (OR 1·13; 95% CI 0·40-3·19) or in-hospital mortality (OR 1·14; 95% CI 0·41-3·18) in the multivariable analysis. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In this study of geriatric patients, guideline-recommended dosing was not associated with significant changes in nephrotoxicity or mortality. As 40% of the patients who received guideline-recommended dosing failed to achieve a target vancomycin trough of ≥ 15 mg/L, future studies should focus on dosing strategies to increase target attainment rate.

Guideline-concordant therapy and outcomes in healthcare-associated pneumonia.

Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) guidelines were first proposed in 2005 but have not yet been validated. The objective of this study was to compare 30-day mortality in HCAP patients treated with either guideline-concordant (GC)-HCAP therapy or GC community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapy. We performed a population-based cohort study of >150 hospitals in the US Veterans Health Administration. Patients were included if they had one or more HCAP risk factors and received antibiotic therapy within 48 h of admission. Critically ill patients were excluded. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were determined in a generalised linear mixed-effect model, with admitting hospital as a random effect. Propensity scores for the probability of receiving GC-HCAP therapy were calculated and incorporated into a second logistic regression model. A total of 15,071 patients met study criteria and received GC-HCAP therapy (8.0%), GC-CAP therapy (75.7%) or non-GC therapy (16.3%). The strongest predictors of 30-day mortality were recent hospital admission (OR 2.49, 95% CI 2.12-2.94) and GC-HCAP therapy (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.86-2.55). GC-HCAP therapy remained an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.82-2.48) in the propensity score analysis. In nonsevere HCAP patients, GC-HCAP therapy is not associated with improved survival compared with GC-CAP therapy.

Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study.

OBJECTIVE: The 2007 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines recommend that community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients admitted to hospital wards initially receive respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy or beta-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy. There is little evidence as to which regimen is preferred, or if differences in medical resource utilization exist between therapies. Thus, the authors compared length of hospital stay (LOS) and length of intravenous antibiotic therapy (LOIV) for patients who received initial levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily ('combination therapy'). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult hospital CAP cases from January 2005 to December 2007 were identified by principal discharge diagnosis code. Patients with a chest infiltrate and medical notes indicative of CAP were included. Direct intensive care unit admits and healthcare-associated cases were excluded. A propensity score technique was used to balance characteristics associated with initial antimicrobial therapy using multivariable regression to derive the scores. Propensity score categories, defined as propensity score quintiles, rather than propensity scores themselves, were used in the least squares regression model to assess the impact of LOS and LOIV. RESULTS: A total of 495 patients from six hospitals met study criteria. Of these, 313 (63%) received levofloxacin and 182 (37%) received combination therapy. Groups were similar with respect to age, sex, most comorbidities, presenting signs and symptoms, and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) risk class. Patients on combination therapy were more likely to have heart failure and receive pre-admission antibiotics. Adjusted least squares mean (+/-SE) LOS and LOIV were shorter with levofloxacin versus combination therapy: LOS, 4.6 +/- 0.17 vs. 5.4 +/- 0.22 days, p < 0.01; and LOIV, 3.6 +/- 0.17 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.21 days, p < 0.01. Results for PSI risk class III or IV patients were: LOS, 5.0 +/- 0.30 vs. 5.9 +/- 0.37 days, p = 0.07; and LOIV, 3.7 +/- 0.33 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.39 days, p < 0.01. Due to the retrospective study design, limited sample size, and scope (single health-network), the authors encourage replication of this study in other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: Given the LOS and LOIV reductions of 0.8 and 1.2 days, respectively, utilization of levofloxacin 750 mg daily for CAP patients admitted to the medical floor has the potential to result in substantial cost savings for US hospitals.

Monotherapy versus combination antibiotic therapy for patients with bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia.

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of antimicrobial monotherapy vs combination therapy on length of stay and mortality for patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Thirty-nine percent of patients received monotherapy, while 61% received combination therapy. Although there was no significant difference in mortality (OR 1.25, 95% CI = 0.25-6.8), there was a significant increase in length of stay for patients who received combination therapy (p = 0.02). Patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia treated with empiric combination therapy had no significant difference in mortality; however, they did have increased length of stay after adjusting for severity of illness. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine what is the optimal empiric antimicrobial regime for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

The contribution of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling with Monte Carlo simulation to the development of susceptibility breakpoints for Neisseria meningitidis.

This study used pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling and MICs of 15 antimicrobial agents, derived from testing a large international culture collection, to assist in the development of interpretative criteria, i.e., breakpoints, for Neisseria meningitidis. PK parameters, protein binding, percentage penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the variability of these values, were extracted from the published literature for the 15 agents. PK-PD parameters have not been developed specifically for N. meningitidis in animal or human studies. Thus, it was necessary to invoke PK-PD targets from other organisms that cause infections at similar sites. The PK-PD targets utilised were: time above the MIC for at least 50% of the dosing interval for all beta-lactams, chloramphenicol, sulphafurazole and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole; an AUC/MIC ratio of >or=25 for the tetracyclines and macrolides; and an AUC/MIC ratio of >or=125 for the fluoroquinolones. A 10 000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was designed with the usual dosing regimens of each antimicrobial agent at MIC values of 0.03-64 mg/L in both serum and CSF. The PK-PD breakpoint was defined as the MIC at which the calculated target attainment was >or=95%. Using these assumptions, the proposed PK-PD breakpoints were: azithromycin, 0.125 mg/L; doxycycline, 0.25 mg/L; cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, 0.5 mg/L; penicillin G, meropenem, rifampicin, tetracycline and minocycline, 1 mg/L; chloramphenicol and sulphafurazole, 2 mg/L; and ampicillin, ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 4 mg/L. Proposed PK-PD breakpoints applicable to CSF were: penicillin and cefotaxime, 0.06 mg/L; rifampicin, 0.125 mg/L; ceftriaxone, meropenem and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 0.25 mg/L; ampicillin, 0.5 mg/L; and chloramphenicol, 1 mg/L.

Continuous infusion beta-lactams for intensive care unit pulmonary infections.

This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion beta-lactams against pulmonary isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients managed in intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA. Multiple 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed by integrating pharmacokinetic data from healthy individuals with 2408 MICs from the 2002 Intensive Care Unit Surveillance System database. These pharmacodynamic simulations suggested that continuous infusion regimens of cefepime, aztreonam, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g have the greatest likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in the ICU. Beta-lactams are unlikely to achieve pharmacodynamic targets against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii when administered as monotherapy.