Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 79(4): 610-5, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25726019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the personal and social resources of children with a cochlear implant from a child's perspective. METHOD: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 19 children with cochlear implants, aged 9-12 years. Data was collected, using the children's sense of coherence (CSOC) scale, the Network map, and the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). The data was analyzed using descriptive and correlation statistics. RESULTS: Most children had a strong sense of coherence. School life was an important arena for their social network. The mental health was comparable to normal hearing children. Still, some of the children with implants had low SOC and poor mental health. High SOC and closeness of the social network, especially in school, were associated with good mental health. CONCLUSION: This study shows that Swedish school-aged children with cochlear implants as a group have access to personal and social resources as strong sense of coherence and social networks. Still, there are individual children with psychosocial problems who need support and treatment.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Mental Health , Sense of Coherence , Social Behavior , Social Support , Child , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hearing Loss/therapy , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden
2.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 76(8): 1107-12, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22613755

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to explore and compare how children with cochlear implants, their parents, and their teachers perceive the children's mental health in terms of emotional and behavioral strengths and difficulties. METHODS: The self-report, parents', and teachers' versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) were used to assess the mental health of 22 children with cochlear implants. The children's assessments were then compared to the parents' and 17 teachers' assessments. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software package. RESULTS: Total difficulties (p=.000), emotional symptoms (p=.000), and conduct problems (p=.007) were greater according to the children than according to parents and teachers. Younger children (9 years, n=12) reported more emotional symptoms than older children (12 and 15 years, n=10). Almost a quarter of the children rated themselves in a way indicating mental ill-health. Parents and teachers each indicated mental ill-health for one child. CONCLUSIONS: Children with cochlear implants express greater concerns about their mental health than their parents and teachers do. This is important knowledge for adults in families, schools, and health care in order to support these children and offer treatment when needed.


Subject(s)
Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Faculty , Hearing Loss/surgery , Parents , Self Report , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 132(2): 179-87, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22074015

ABSTRACT

CONCLUSION: The Harmony processor was found to be reliable, comfortable and offered a substantially increased battery life compared with the previous generation processor. No significant improvement in speech understanding with HiRes was demonstrated from objective measures, but the majority of subjects showed a clear subjective preference for the combination HiRes 120/Harmony processor. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate experience with the Harmony™ sound processor, together with the HiRes 120 strategy. METHODS: Postlingually deafened adults implanted with a CII or HiRes 90K were included and divided into three groups: (1) experienced users using the Platinum body-worn processor; (2) experienced users who had been using other processors; (3) new users with the Harmony processor from first fitting. The latter group entered a randomized crossover protocol where half were initially fitted with HiRes and half with HiRes 120. The initial strategy was used for 3 months and the alternative for a further 3 months. Speech perception tests and questionnaires were performed. RESULTS: The study included 65 subjects. Implementing HiRes 120 was straightforward. The speech test group results did not show significant differences between HiRes and HiRes 120. However, the questionnaires showed significantly higher ratings for HiRes 120 in some instances. Subjects were highly satisfied with the Harmony processor.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Speech Perception , Adult , Auditory Perception , Cross-Over Studies , Electric Power Supplies , Ergonomics , Humans , Middle Aged , Music , Patient Satisfaction , Prosthesis Design , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
5.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 75(6): 844-9, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21514963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to enhance knowledge about the life circumstances of children with cochlear implants or hearing aids, regarding daily functioning and attitude to the impairment. METHODS: Data were obtained from 36 children with cochlear implants and 38 children with hearing aids via study-specific questionnaires with fixed answer alternatives. The questions covered (1) usage of aids and related factors, (2) hearing in different everyday situations, (3) thoughts about the children's own hearing and others' attitudes to it, and (4) choice of language. The data were analyzed using SPSS, and presented via the theoretical frame of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Child and Youth version (ICF-CY). RESULTS: Children with CI and HA functioned equally well in daily life, but there were also certain differences. Symptoms from neck and shoulders were more common among children with hearing aids than among children with cochlear implants (p<.001). Children with hearing aids used their aids significantly less often than those with cochlear implants (p<.001). The participation variables showed that children with hearing aids had significantly more hearing problems in team sports (p=.033) and outdoor activities (p=.019), in comparison to children with cochlear implants. The two groups had similar thoughts regarding their own hearing, mostly considering it not to be a problem. They also did not generally think that other people found their hearing to be a problem. CONCLUSIONS: Children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids have, in some aspects, equally good functioning in everyday life situations. However, certain differences were found in dimensions of functioning, regarding neck and shoulder pain, usage of aids and sign language, and hearing problems in some activities.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/therapy , Adolescent , Auditory Threshold , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hearing Loss/complications , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Language , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Speech Perception
6.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 131(5): 504-11, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21426275

ABSTRACT

CONCLUSIONS: Data from 50 patients suggest that the SONATATI(100) cochlear implant (CI) is a safe and effective device. OBJECTIVE: MED-EL has developed and tested a CI with titanium housing (the SONATATI(100)), which has the same internal components as the PULSARCI(100). Implant surgery should be less traumatic, as with these CIs smaller incisions and less drilling are involved. The study aimed to assess surgical issues pertaining to the implantation of the device, patient compatibility with the titanium of the implant housing, and other patient-related issues. METHODS: Fifty patients were recruited into this multicenter study. In phase 1, 30 adults and in phase 2, 20 children received a SONATATI(100) cochlear implant. An intraoperative survey was completed by the surgeons for all patients. A postoperative survey was completed by the audiologists/fitting engineers at first fitting and 3 and 6 months after the first fitting to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of the device. RESULTS: The device was proven to be effective in that it was stable in the implant bed and that minimally invasive surgery could be carried out. The device was proven to be safe after medium-term use and no unexpected adverse events were reported.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Titanium
8.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 20(5): 315-9, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19585962

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While several studies have investigated the presence and annoyance of tinnitus in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, few studies have probed the handicap experienced in association with tinnitus in this population. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use validated self-report measures in a consecutive sample of CI patients who reported tinnitus in order to determine the extent of tinnitus handicap. RESEARCH DESIGN: In a retrospective design, a total of 151 patients (80% response rate) responded to a postal questionnaire, and of these, 111 (74%) reported that they currently experienced tinnitus and were asked to complete the full questionnaire. Sampling was performed at a point of a mean 2.9 years postsurgery (SD = 1.8 years). Three established self-report questionnaires were included measuring tinnitus handicap (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI]), hearing problems (Gothenburg Profile), and finally, a measure of anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). We analyzed the data by means of Pearson product moment correlations, t-tests, ANOVAs, and chi-square. RESULTS: Data from the validated questionnaires showed relatively low levels of tinnitus distress, moderate levels of hearing problems, and low scores on the anxiety and depression scales. Using the criteria proposed for the THI (which was completed by 107 patients), 35% (N = 38) had a score indicating "no handicap," 30% (N = 32) "mild handicap" 18% (N = 19) "moderate handicap", and 17% (N = 18) "severe handicap." Thus 37 individuals from the total series of 151 reported moderate to severe tinnitus handicap (24.5%). Tinnitus distress was associated with increased hearing problems, anxiety, and depression. CONCLUSION: Tinnitus can be a significant problem following CI, but that the experienced distress is often moderate. However, a quarter of CI recipients do demonstrate moderate/severe tinnitus handicap, and thus are candidates for tinnitus specific therapy. The level of tinnitus handicap is associated with hearing problems and psychological distress.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Cochlear Implants , Depression/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Tinnitus/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/physiopathology , Depression/physiopathology , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tinnitus/physiopathology , Tinnitus/rehabilitation , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...