Effect of belimumab treatment on renal outcomes: results from the phase 3 belimumab clinical trials in patients with SLE.

A pooled post-hoc analysis of the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled BLISS trials (1684 patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)) was performed to evaluate the effect of belimumab on renal parameters in patients with renal involvement at baseline, and to explore whether belimumab offered additional renal benefit to patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil at baseline. In addition to belimumab or placebo, all patients received standard SLE therapy. Patients with severe active lupus nephritis were excluded from the trials. Over 52 weeks, rates of renal flare, renal remission, renal organ disease improvement (assessed by Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group), proteinuria reduction, grade 3/4 proteinuria, and serologic activity favored belimumab, although the between-group differences in most renal outcomes were not significant. Among the 267 patients with renal involvement at baseline, those receiving mycophenolate mofetil or with serologic activity at baseline had greater renal organ disease improvement with belimumab than with placebo. Limitations of this analysis included the small patient numbers and the post-hoc nature of this pooled analysis. The results suggest that belimumab may offer renal benefit in patients with SLE. Further study is warranted in patients with severe active lupus nephritis.

Safety profile of belimumab: pooled data from placebo-controlled phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Safety data were pooled and analyzed from one phase 2 and two phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat-dose systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) trials of belimumab 1, 4 (phase 2 only), and 10 mg/kg. Types and rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar across treatment groups. Rates of patients experiencing any serious AE were 16.6%, 19.5%, 13.5%, and 18.0% with placebo, and belimumab 1, 4, and 10 mg/kg, respectively; rates of serious infusion reactions (including hypersensitivity reactions) occurring on the same days as infusions were 0.4%, 0.9%, 0%, and 0.9%, and rates of serious infections were 5.5%, 7.1%, 6.3%, and 5.3%. Malignancy rates/100 patient-years (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) were 0.29 with placebo vs. 0.20 with all belimumab doses combined; mortality rates/100 patient-years were 0.43 vs. 0.73. These data support the conclusion that belimumab in combination with standard SLE therapy was generally well tolerated in a predominantly autoantibody-positive population with active SLE.

Randomized study of saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virologic failure on indinavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 359.

This study compared antiretroviral activity among 6 "salvage" therapy regimens. The study was a prospective, randomized, 2x3 factorial, multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. The study enrolled 277 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients naive to nonnucleoside analogues who had taken indinavir >6 months. The patients had 2000-200,000 HIV RNA copies/mL. Patients received saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine and/or adefovir and were followed for safety and antiretroviral response between baseline and week 16. At week 16, 30% (77/254) of patients had

Delavirdine in combination with zidovudine in treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: evaluation of efficacy and emergence of viral resistance in a randomized, comparative phase III trial. The M/3331/0013B Study Group.

We compared the activity of delavirdine (DLV) plus zidovudine (AZT) (n = 300) with that of AZT (n = 297) against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. DLV exerted a transient antiviral effect, and mutations for resistance to DLV were found in more than 90% of subjects at week 12. The K103N mutation, which confers nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance, was found in 85% of the patients.

Tipranavir inhibits broadly protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 clinical samples.

OBJECTIVE: Although the use of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PI) has substantially benefited HIV-1-infected individuals, new PI are urgently needed, as broad PI resistance and therapy failure is common. METHODS: The antiviral activity of tipranavir (TPV), a non-peptidic PI, was assessed in in vitro culture for 134 clinical isolates with a wide range of resistance to currently available peptidomimetic PI. The susceptibility of all 134 variants was then re-tested with the four PI simultaneously with TPV, using the Antivirogram assay. RESULTS: Of 105 viruses with more than tenfold resistance to three or four PI and an average of 6.1 PI mutations per sample, 95 (90%) were susceptible to TPV; eight (8%) had four- to tenfold resistance to TPV and only two (2%) had more than tenfold resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial lack of PI cross-resistance to TPV shown by highly PI-resistant clinical isolates makes TPV an attractive new-generation HIV inhibitor.

Delavirdine susceptibilities and associated reverse transcriptase mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients in a phase I/II trial of delavirdine monotherapy (ACTG 260).

The development of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to delavirdine (DLV) was studied in subjects receiving DLV monotherapy. Phenotypic resistance developed in 28 of 30 subjects within 8 weeks. K103N and Y181C, which confer nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) cross-resistance, were the predominant reverse transcriptase mutations. P236L, which confers DLV resistance but hypersensitivity to other NNRTIs, developed in <10% of isolates.

Relationship between CD4 count, viral burden, and quality of life over time in HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Although surrogate markers such as CD4 counts and viral burden (HIV-1 RNA) are predictive of AIDS-related disease progression, little is known about the relationship between changes in surrogate markers and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes. This study investigated how changes in CD4/mm3 and viral burden (RNA copies/mL) are related to changes in HRQOL as indexed by the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV-30). METHODS: Subjects were HIV-1-infected patients with CD4 counts <300/mm3 enrolled in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of delavirdine. As part of the clinical protocol, patients completed the MOS-HIV-30, from which the Physical Health (PHS) and Mental Health (MHS) summary scores were used for analyses. HRQOL and surrogate marker data assessed up to 2 years after randomization were analyzed for a total of 1,112 patients. RESULTS: Individual patients' initial status (intercepts) and rates of change (slopes) over time for log CD4, log RNA, PHS, and MHS were estimated with the use of empirical Bayes. Early response to treatment correlated with HRQOL better for RNA than for CD4. However, the relationship between weekly change and HRQOL was stronger for CD4 than for RNA. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate markers are significantly associated with HRQOL outcomes. Improvements in HRQOL over time are associated with lower initial viral load and with increases in CD4 counts. Limitations concerning the restricted variability of the change scores are addressed.

Efficacy and safety of delavirdine mesylate with zidovudine and didanosine compared with two-drug combinations of these agents in persons with HIV disease with CD4 counts of 100 to 500 cells/mm3 (ACTG 261). ACTG 261 Team.

To evaluate the antiretroviral activity of delavirdine mesylate, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1, we performed a phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing the three-drug combination of delavirdine with zidovudine and didanosine to two-drug combinations of these drugs. Patients with CD4 cell counts between 100 and 500 cells/mm3 without prior or <6 months of monotherapy with zidovudine or didanosine were randomized to one of four arms and observed on a follow-up basis for 48 weeks. In total, 544 patients were evaluated. In those assigned to the three-drug regimen, mean short-term (weeks 4-12) and long-term (weeks 40-48) change in CD4 cells from baseline were 49.3+/-8.1 and 65.4+/-13.4 cells/mm3, respectively; mean short-term and long-term HIV-1 RNA changes from baseline were -1.13 log10+/-0.12 and -0.73+/-0.12 copies/ml, respectively. These responses in CD4 cell counts and HIV-1 RNA levels were better in comparisons with each of the two-drug arms at all study points; however, differences were not consistently significant. Gastrointestinal side effects were experienced by 33% of patients (178 of 544), and 30% (121 of 407) receiving delavirdine experienced rash, only one case of which was severe. In this study, therapy with delavirdine + zidovudine + didanosine was safe and showed modest, but not always significant, antiviral activity and CD4 cell count benefit compared with two-drug regimens with these agents. Key

ACTG 260: a randomized, phase I-II, dose-ranging trial of the anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity of delavirdine monotherapy. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 260 Team.

ACTG 260 was an open-label, four-arm trial designed to study the safety and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) activity of delavirdine monotherapy at three ranges of concentrations in plasma compared to those of control therapy with zidovudine or didanosine. Delavirdine doses were adjusted weekly until subjects were within their target trough concentration range (3 to 10, 11 to 30, or 31 to 50 microM). A total of 113 subjects were analyzed. At week 2, the mean HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level declines among the subjects in the three delavirdine arms were similar (0.87, 1.08, and 1.02 log10 for the low, middle, and high target arms, respectively), but by week 8, the subjects in the pooled delavirdine arms showed only a 0.10 log10 reduction. In the subjects in the nucleoside arm, mean HIV-1 RNA level reductions at weeks 2 and 8 were 0.67 and 0.55 log10, respectively. Because viral suppression by delavirdine was not maintained, the trial was stopped early. Rash, which was usually self-limited, developed in 36% of subjects who received delavirdine. Delavirdine monotherapy has potent anti-HIV activity at 2 weeks, but its activity is time limited due to the rapid emergence of drug resistance.

Effect of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients.

Fluconazole, an inhibitor of certain human cytochrome P-450 isozymes, is used for the prevention and treatment of a broad range of fungal infections that predominantly affect immunocompromised individuals. This study evaluated the influence of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine, a nonnucleoside inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, in 13 HIV-1-infected patients with CD4 counts ranging from 186 to 480/mm3. Both the control group (n = 5) and the fluconazole group (n = 8) received 300 mg of delavirdine mesylate every 8 h for 30 days; subjects in the fluconazole group took a 400-mg, once-daily dose of fluconazole on study days 16 to 30. Harvested plasma from serial blood samples collected on days 15, 16, and 30 were assayed for concentrations of delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite by a reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Blood samples obtained on days 16 and 30 were also assayed for fluconazole by HPLC. Delavirdine mesylate alone and in combination with fluconazole was well tolerated. There were no significant differences (P > 0.16) in delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters between treatment groups on day 15 or day 30. After coadministration of fluconazole and delavirdine mesylate for 2 weeks (day 30), no significant differences (P > 0.058) were observed in any delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters relative to those after receiving delavirdine mesylate alone (day 15) after in the fluconazole group. Fluconazole pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those previously reported for healthy volunteers and HIV-positive patients. On the basis of these findings, fluconazole and delavirdine mesylate may be taken concurrently without adjustment of the dose of either drug.

Pharmacokinetic study of the interaction between rifabutin and delavirdine mesylate in HIV-1 infected patients.

The oxidative metabolism of delavirdine, a non-nucleoside inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, is mediated in part by cytochrome P450 3A. The influence of rifabutin, an inducer of certain human cytochrome P450 isozymes, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine was investigated in 12 HIV-positive patients with CD4 counts ranging from 75 to 671/mm3. Both the control group (n = 5) and the rifabutin group (n = 7) received 400 mg delavirdine mesylate every 8 h for 30 days; subjects in the rifabutin group took a 300 mg, once-daily dose of rifabutin on study days 16-30. Harvested plasma from serial blood samples collected after dosing on days 15, 16, and 30 was assayed for delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite concentrations using a reversed-phase HPLC method. Blood samples obtained on days 16 and 30 were also assayed for rifabutin by HPLC. Delavirdine mesylate alone or in combination with rifabutin was well-tolerated. On day 30, statistically significant differences between groups were observed for all delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters (P < 0.046). After coadministration of rifabutin and delavirdine mesylate for 2 weeks, oral clearance of delavirdine increased five-fold, resulting in lower steady-state plasma delavirdine concentrations. Rifabutin pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those previously reported. Concomitant use of delavirdine and rifabutin at the recommended dose for each drug is discouraged. Maintaining therapeutic concentrations of delavirdine in patients on both medications may require dose modification.

Pharmacokinetic study of the interaction between rifampin and delavirdine mesylate.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of rifampin (INN, rifampicin), a potent inducer of cytochrome P450, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine. METHODS: Twelve patients who were positive for human immunodeficiency virus, with CD4 counts ranging from 110 to 483/mm3, were randomized to two groups and studied in parallel. Both the control group (n = 5) and the rifampin group (n = 7) received 400 mg delavirdine mesylate every 8 hours for 30 days; subjects in the rifampin group took a 600 mg once-daily dose of rifampin on days 16 through 30. Harvested plasma from serial blood samples collected after dosing on days 15, 16, and 30 was assayed for delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite concentrations with a reversed-phase HPLC method. Blood samples obtained on days 16 and 30 were also assayed for rifampin by HPLC. RESULTS: Delavirdine mesylate alone and in combination with rifampin was well tolerated. On day 30, statistically significant differences between groups were observed for all delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters (p < 0.049). In the rifampin group, delavirdine oral clearance increased by about 27-fold (p = 0.022), resulting in virtually negligible (< 0.09 mumol/L) steady-state through drug concentrations in all patients after 2 weeks of concurrent dosing of delavirdine mesylate and rifampin. The ratio of metabolite formation to elimination clearance for desalkyldelavirdine was significantly higher (3.9 +/- 1.2 versus 0.23 +/- 0.10) and delavirdine elimination half-life was significantly shorter (1.7 +/- 1.4 versus 4.3 +/- 1.3 hours) when delavirdine mesylate was taken with rifampin. Rifampin pharmacokinetic parameters on days 16 and 30 were similar to those previously reported for normal volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that rifampin induces the metabolism of delavirdine. Therefore therapy with rifampin is contraindicated in patients receiving delavirdine mesylate.

Effects of reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy on the HIV-1 viral burden in semen.

HIV-1 infection continues to spread worldwide, primarily through sexual intercourse. Because semen is a major vehicle for transmission of HIV-1, we evaluated the effects of reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy on the amount of HIV-1 in semen. The semen and blood of 11 HIV-1-infected men (i.e. treatment group) were collected before the initiation of reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy and then 8 to 18 weeks after initiation of therapy. The semen and blood of another 11 HIV-1-infected men (i.e., longitudinal group), who were not on or had no change in antiretroviral therapy for at least 2 months before study entry, were collected at approximately 2-week intervals for 10 to 26 weeks. In the treatment group, 82% of the seminal plasma HIV-1 RNA levels decreased from baseline after 8 to 18 weeks of therapy (median reduction of 1.01 log10, p = 0.01), and 100% of the blood plasma RNA levels decreased from baseline over the same period (median reduction of 0.92 log10, p = 0.003). Five of these patients were followed for at least 52 weeks and had a median seminal plasma HIV-1 RNA level of 0.66 log10 below baseline at 1 year. All subjects in the treatment group with positive cultures at baseline (50%) had negative cultures or a lower infectious units per ejaculate at the 8- to 18-week follow-up examinations. The HIV-1 RNA levels in blood and semen of the longitudinal group did not change significantly over 10 to 26 weeks. Initiation of reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy effectively reduces shedding of HIV-1 in semen and may therefore reduce the spread of infection within populations.

HIV-1 drug susceptibilities and reverse transcriptase mutations in patients receiving combination therapy with didanosine and delavirdine.

Previous studies have shown that the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase mutation Y181C, which confers high-level resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), develops rarely during therapy with NNRTIs plus zidovudine. To determine whether didanosine (ddI) is also effective in preventing the emergence of Y181C, we analyzed delavirdine (DLV) susceptibilties and reverse transcriptase sequences of isolates obtained from patients enrolled in a pharmacokinetic study of DLV and ddI. Nine NNRTI-naive patients were evaluated. Seven received DLV/ddI and two received DLV/ddI/zidovudine. Median durations of prior zidovudine and ddI were 26 and 15 months, respectively. Isolates from eight of nine patients had a mutation(s) associated with nucleoside resistance at entry. After treatment with DLV and ddI alone, isolates from five of seven patients developed Y181C, four in combination with K103N. Thus, in this group of nucleoside-experienced patients, combination therapy with DLV/ddI did not prevent the emergence of Y181C.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of delavirdine mesylate and didanosine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Delavirdine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with in vitro activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that is currently being evaluated in combination regimens with various nucleoside analogs, including didanosine. Due to the pH-dependent solubility of delavirdine, the buffering agents in didanosine formulations may reduce delavirdine absorption. To evaluate the potential interaction between these agents, 12 HIV-infected patients (mean [+/- standard deviation] CD4+ cell count, 304 +/- 213/mm3) were enrolled in a three-way crossover single-dose study. Didanosine (125 to 200 mg given as buffered tablets) and delavirdine mesylate (400 mg) pharmacokinetics were evaluated when each drug was given alone (treatments A and B, respectively), when the two drugs were given concurrently (treatment C), and when didanosine was given 1 h after delavirdine (treatment D). Delavirdine exposure was reduced by concurrent administration of didanosine. The maximum drug concentration in serum (Cmax) was reduced from 7.22 +/- 4.0 to 3.51 +/- 1.9 microM, and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-->infinity) was reduced from 22.5 +/- 14 to 14 +/- 5.7 microM.h. The extent of N-dealkylation, as indicated by the ratio of the N-dealkylated delavirdine AUC0-->infinity to the delavirdine AUC0-->infinity, was unchanged across study treatments (P = 0.708). Reductions in didanosine exposure were observed during concurrent administration with delavirdine with a Cmax reduction from 4.65 +/- 2.0 to 3.22 +/- 0.59 microM and an AUC0-->infinity reduction from 7.93 +/- 3.9 to 6.54 +/- 2.3 microM.h. Thus, concurrent administration of delavirdine and didanosine may reduce the AUC0-->infinity of both drugs, although the clinical significance of this reduction is unknown. Administration of delavirdine 1 h before didanosine avoided the interaction. Due to the single-dose nature of this study, these findings require further evaluation at steady state.

Randomized, controlled phase I/II, trial of combination therapy with delavirdine (U-90152S) and conventional nucleosides in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

Delavirdine mesylate (DLV) is a potent nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with activity specific for human immunodeficiency virus type 1. In the present phase I/II study we evaluated the safety, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activities of two-drug and three-drug combinations of DLV and conventional doses of nucleoside analogs compared with those of both DLV monotherapy and two-drug nucleoside analog therapy. A total of 85 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infected patients with CD4 counts of 100 to 300 cells per mm3 were enrolled in two periods: in the first period patients were randomized to receive either zidovudine (ZDV) plus didanosine (group 1) or ZDV plus didanosine plus escalating doses (400 to 1,200 mg/day) of DLV (group 2). In the second period, patients were randomized to receive either 1,200 mg of DLV alone per day (group 3) or ZDV plus 1,200 mg of DLV per day (group 4). DLV demonstrated good oral bioavailability at all five doses tested. The major toxicity was a transient mild rash which appeared in 44% of all DLV recipients. Overall, group 2 patients demonstrated more sustained improvements in CD4 counts, percent CD4 cells, branched DNA levels, p24 antigen levels, and virus titers in plasma than group 1, 3, or 4 patients. The magnitude of the response correlated with the intensity of prior nucleoside analog treatment, the non-syncytium-inducing or syncytium-inducing viral phenotype at baseline, and the presence of a wild-type codon at amino acid position 215 in the baseline reverse transcriptase genotype. Despite a transient rash, DLV therapy was well tolerated. Combination therapy with DLV and nucleoside analogs appears promising, with the three-drug combination appearing to be more potent that either two-drug combinations or monotherapy.

Delavirdine mesylate, a potent non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor.

In summary, DLV has been well-tolerated in > 1,000 HIV-1 infected patients. Skin rash is the most prevalent medical event associated with DLV therapy. The rash can be successfully dosed through or rechallenged in > 85% of patients. The pharmacokinetics are non-linear as DLV is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P4503A in the liver. Serum levels of DLV +/- 10 microM can easily be achieved in most HIV-1 patients, which are 100 fold above the in vitro IC90 activity. In clinical trials, DLV inhibits viral replication as demonstrated by positive surrogate marker responses (CD4 counts, P24 antigen concentration, PMBC and plasma virus titers, and plasma HIV RNA concentration). Susceptibility of HIV-1 strains to DLV decrease over time in a majority of subjects in which virus can be cultured. However, HIV strains from about 80% of subjects had a DLV IC50 < 10 microM (the trough DLV concentration in plasma) throughout the Upjohn trial. In HIV strains from about 20% of subjects, susceptibility to DLV remained unchanged in the first 8 months of DLV combination therapy, or HIV-1 was not recovered at all or most timepoints. In contrast, development of resistance to nevirapine or L-697,661 monotherapy or combination therapy with ZDV has occurred in the first eight weeks of therapy. The most common genotypic mutations seen to date are K103N and P236L. The clinical significance of the phenotypic, genotypic and surrogate marker changes associated with DLV remain to be elucidated. The surrogate marker responses in clinical trials suggest that DLV has clinical synergy with ZDV +/- ddI as evidenced by a better and more sustained surrogate marker response when a subject is sensitive to or naive to the nucleoside RTI combined with DLV. Future therapy with DLV will likely be in combination with one or more nucleoside or non-nucleoside RTIs, protease inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory agents.

Stable expression of transdominant Rev protein in human T cells inhibits human immunodeficiency virus replication.

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Rev protein is essential for viral structural protein expression (Gag, Pol, and Env) and, hence, for viral replication. In transient transfection assays, mutant forms of Rev have been identified that inhibit wild-type Rev activity and therefore suppress viral replication. To determine whether such transdominant Rev proteins could provide long-term protection against HIV infection without affecting T cell function, T leukemia cell lines were stably transduced with a retroviral vector encoding a transdominant mutant of the Rev protein, M10. While all the M10-expressing cell lines remained infectable by HIV-1, these same cells failed to support a productive replication cycle when infected with a cloned isolate of HIV-1. In addition, two out of three M10-expressing CEM clones were also resistant to highly productive infection by a heterogeneous HIV-1 pool. Expression of M10 did not affect induction of HIV transcription mediated by the kappa B regulatory element or Tat. Importantly, constitutive expression of Rev M10 did not alter the secretion of interleukin 2 in response to mitogen stimulation of EL-4 and Jurkat cells. The inhibition of HIV infection in cells stably expressing a transdominant Rev protein, in the absence of any deleterious effect on T cell function, suggests that such a strategy could provide a therapeutic effect in the T lymphocytes of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients.

Regulation of the IL-2 receptor alpha-gene. Interaction of a kappa B binding protein with cell-specific transcription factors.

The IL-2R alpha enhancer contains an 11 bp sequence that resembles kappa B, a regulatory element associated with several genes, including Ig kappa-L chain and human immunodeficiency virus. Although nuclear factor of the kappa-enhancer in B cells (NF-kappa B) binding is activated by PMA, TNF-alpha, and IL-1, activation of the IL-2R alpha enhancer does not consistently correlate with NF-kappa B induction. In this report, we show that TNF-alpha activates NF-kappa B and the human immunodeficiency virus enhancer in the Jurkat T leukemia but does not stimulate the IL-2R alpha enhancer. In contrast, this cytokine, and IL-1, increased IL-2R alpha gene expression in YT-1 cells. Comparing YT-1 and Jurkat T leukemias, we find that the IL-2R kappa B site is required for TNF-alpha and IL-1 stimulation in YT-1 cells, but that plasmids containing this site linked to a heterologous promoter do not respond to these cytokines. These data suggest that upstream regulatory elements in addition to IL-2R kappa B are needed to mediate this cytokine effect. TNF-alpha also synergized with PMA and other cytokines in the stimulation of the IL-2R alpha enhancer in YT-1. Because these effects are not observed in Jurkat cells, the function of the IL-2R kappa B site is cell-specific and likely mediated by different associated transcription factors present in each cell type.

Requirement of adherent/phagocytic cells for the induction of F1 anti-parent cell-mediated lympholysis. I. Parental adherent splenocytes serve as stimulators.

Primary F1 hybrid anti-parent T cell-mediated lympholysis (F1 alpha P CML), induced in mixed spleen cell cultures, is an immune response specific for self H-2 antigens. The cellular requirements for induction were investigated by depleting or enriching stimulator splenocytes of adherent/phagocytic cells. Relatively large numbers of parental cells that are adherent to Sephadex G-10 particles or to plastic surfaces, and phagocytic for carbonyl iron, were required for stimulation (approximately 10(5) purified stimulators for 3.5 X 10(6) responders). Such parental cells are resistant to gamma radiation (in vivo and in vitro) and hydrocortisone (in vivo), negative for Thy-1, and positive for I-A and I-E/C surface antigens. This subpopulation of macrophages includes the predominant or sole immunogenic parental cell type of the spleen for the F1 alpha P response. Whereas removal of adherent/phagocytic cells from parental splenocytes entailed loss of stimulatory activity for F1 responder T lymphocytes, this was not the case for allogeneic responders. The ability to induce allogeneic CML was, in fact, fully retained by depleted parental cells. Adherent/phagocytic cells of F1 responder origin were available for cellular interactions in all mixed spleen cultures, yet they were competent for presentation of alloantigens, but not of self antigens borne by parental cells other than macrophages. In conclusion, the cellular requirements for stimulation differ quantitatively and qualitatively in F1 alpha P CML as compared to allogeneic and other CML systems. The distinct requirements presumably relate to the generation of specific effectors that are autoreactive as opposed to reactive with foreign antigens.