Avaliação e comparação entre métodos de mensuração de pressão arterial sistólica em gatos hígidos anestesiados / Evaluation and comparison between methods of measurement of systolic blood pressure in healthy anesthetized cats

Foram avaliados e comparados, para fins de validação, dois diferentes métodos de mensuração de pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), não invasivos ou indiretos (oscilométrico e Doppler vascular) com o invasivo ou direto (cateterização arterial - padrão ouro), em 12 gatos hígidos anestesiados de idade variando entre sete meses e dois anos. Em cada animal, procedeu-se à mensuração simultânea da pressão não invasiva e da invasiva. O método oscilométrico foi comparado, por meio de sete medidas consecutivas, com intervalo de 30 segundos entre elas, com o método invasivo, e, logo em seguida, o método Doppler foi comparado ao método invasivo da mesma maneira. Concluiu-se que o método oscilométrico é estatisticamente igual ao método invasivo, enquanto o Doppler difere de ambos. Entretanto, pela forte correlação positiva entre os métodos Doppler e invasivo, foi possível criar um fator de correção (equação de regressão linear) para se determinar o valor da pressão invasiva, a partir do valor obtido pelo método Doppler. Para obtenção de valores mais fidedignos, recomenda-se a utilização desse fator de correção quando o método Doppler for utilizado para mensuração de PAS em gatos anestesiados.

For validation purposes, two different methods of measurement of systolic blood pressure (SBP), noninvasive or indirect (oscillometric and vascular doppler), direct or invasive (arterial catheterization - the gold standard) were evaluated and compared in 12 healthy anesthetized cats, varying between seven months to two years old. In each animal, we proceeded to the simultaneous noninvasive and invasive measurement of pressure. The oscillometric method was compared by means of seven consecutive measurements with an interval of 30 seconds between them, with the invasive method, and soon after, the doppler method was compared to the invasive method in the same way. It was concluded that the oscillometric method is statistically equal to the invasive method, whereas doppler differs from both. However, due to the strong positive correlation between doppler and invasive methods, it was possible to create a correction factor (linear regression) to determine the value of invasive pressure from the value obtained by the doppler method. To obtain more reliable figures, it is recommended to use this correction factor when the doppler method is used to measure SBP in anesthetized cats.

A phytopathogenic cysteine peptidase from latex of wild rubber vine Cryptostegia grandiflora.

A 24,118 Da (MALDI-TOF) cysteine peptidase (EC 3.4.22.16) was purified from the latex extract of Cryptostegia grandiflora by two chromatographic steps involving ion exchange and Reverse-phase HPLC. The purified protein (Cg24-I) exhibits a single band profile following reduced SDS-PAGE and a unique amino terminal sequence, 1VPASIDWREKGTVL14, that is similar to other plant cysteine peptidases. Cg24-I displayed optimal proteolytic activity at pH 8.0 with 25 mM phosphate buffer. The proteolytic activity was inhibited with 0.2 mM E-64 and 1 mM iodoacetamide and was stimulated with 1 mM DTT. Cg24-I fully inhibited spore germination of phytopathogenic fungi Fusarium solani at a dose of 28.1 µg/mL. Its toxicity involves the membrane permeabilization of spores as probed by propidium iodide uptake. These results show that latex peptidases are part of the plant's defensive strategy against phytopathogens and that they most likely act synergistically with other recognized defensive proteins.

Pro- and anti-inflammatory activities of the latex from Calotropis procera (Ait.) R.Br. are triggered by compounds fractionated by dialysis.

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Previous studies have described pro- and anti-inflammatory activities displayed by the latex from Calotropis procera. This report aims to clarify these observations and shows that such activities can be segregated from the whole latex. METHODS: The latex was divided into water-soluble fractions devoid of poly-isoprene by centrifugation and dialysis and both the activities were assayed by the peritonitis model in rats. The drugs dexamethasone, thalidomide, meclizine, indomethacin and celecoxib were used to modulate the inflammatory stimuli. RESULTS: Inflammation in rats was observed 2 h after intraperitoneal administration of the stimulus (DL fraction) in a dose dependent manner. This activity was inhibited by previous intravenous injection of dexamethasone, thalidomide and meclizine. Indomethacin and celecoxib did not reverse inflammation. These results suggest the involvement of histamine release and TNF-alpha mediated inflammation while prostaglandins seem not to be required. The anti-inflammatory fraction (NDL) inhibited inflammation triggered by proinflammatory fraction (DL) suggesting that NDL ought to follow a similar pathway of action to that of the anti-inflammatory drugs that were able to inhibit inflammation triggered by DL. CONCLUSIONS: Pro- and anti-inflammatory activities of the latex are displayed by compounds suitable to be fractionated on the basis of their molecular size.