Association of development quotient with nutritional status of vitamins B6, B12, and folate in 6-59-month-old children: Results from the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019).

BACKGROUND: Vitamins B6, B12, and folate are essential for the formation and maintenance of the human brain, but studies evaluating these vitamins with early childhood development (ECD) in children under 5 y are limited and controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between vitamins B6, B12, and folate concentrations/status and ECD. METHODS: Data regarding 6520 children aged 6-59 mo from the ENANI-2019 (the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition) were analyzed. ECD was assessed using the Survey of Well-being of Young Children's milestones questionnaire. Vitamin B6 concentration (nmol/L) was classified according to the tertile of the distribution and with the cutoff <20 nmol/L. Folate concentrations >45.3 nmol/L were classified as high, and vitamin B12 <150 pmol/L was deficient. The graded response model was used to estimate developmental age, and the developmental quotient (DQ) was calculated as the developmental age divided by chronological age. Multiple linear regression models were adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: The DQ mean (95% confidence interval) for Brazilian children was 0.99 (0.97-1.01). Children aged 6-23 mo [1.13 (1.10-1.16)] had a higher DQ mean than those aged 24-35 [0.99 (0.95-1.03)] and 36-59 mo [0.89 (0.86-0.92)]. Child age was inversely associated with DQ (ß = -0.007; P < 0.001). An interaction between child age and vitamin B12 deficiency in the DQ (ß = -0.005; P < 0.001) indicated that, in children aged 36-59 mo, the DQ was markedly lower in children with vitamin B12 deficiency than in those without vitamin B12 deficiency. Vitamin B6 concentrations were directly associated with the DQ (ß = 0.0004; P = 0.031) among children aged 24-59 mo in the adjusted model. No association was observed between folate status and DQ. CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, the DQ is lower among older children and those with vitamin B12 deficiency. Vitamin B6 status was directly associated with the DQ in children aged 24-59 mo.

Gestational weight gain according to the Brazilian charts and its association with maternal and infant adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The lack of gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for low- and middle-income countries is a significant concern. OBJECTIVES: To identify the ranges on the Brazilian GWG charts associated with lowest risks of selected adverse maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Data from 3 large Brazilian datasets were used. Pregnant individuals aged ≥18, without hypertensive disorders or gestational diabetes were included. Total GWG was standardized to gestational age-specific z-scores according to Brazilian GWG charts. A composite infant outcome was defined as the occurrence of any of small-for-gestationa lage (SGA), large-forgestationa lage (LGA), or preterm birth. In a separate sample, postpartum weight retention (PPWR) was measured at 6 and/or 12 mo postpartum. Multiple logistic and Poisson regressions were performed with GWG z-scores as the exposure and individual and composite outcomes. GWG ranges associated with the lowest risk of the composite infant outcome were identified using noninferiority margins. RESULTS: For the neonatal outcomes, 9500 individuals were included in the sample. For PPWR, 2602 and 7859 individuals were included at 6 and 12 mo postpartum, respectively. Overall, 7.5% of the neonates were SGA, 17.6% LGA, and 10.5% were preterm. Higher GWG z-scores were positively associated with LGA birth, whereas lower z-scores were positively associated with SGA births. The risk of the selected adverse neonatal outcomes were lowest (within 10% of lowest observed risk) when individuals with underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity gained between 8.8-12.6; 8.7-12.4; 7.0-8.9; and 5.0-7.2 kg, respectively. These gains correspond to probabilities of PPWR ≥5 kg at 12 mo of 30% for individuals with under and normal weight, and <20% for overweight and obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence to inform new GWG recommendations in Brazil.

Prevalence and temporal trends in prepregnancy nutritional status and gestational weight gain of adult women followed in the Brazilian Food and Nutrition Surveillance System from 2008 to 2018.

Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are the most investigated indicators of maternal nutritional status, which is a modifiable factor that plays a vital role in maternal and infant health. This study describes prepregnancy BMI and GWG of 840,243 women with 2,087,765 weight observations in the Brazilian Food and Nutrition Surveillance System from 2008 to 2018. Prepregnancy BMI was classified according to the World Health Organization cut-offs. Total GWG was calculated from weight measurements taken after 36 weeks of pregnancy and classified according to the Institute of Medicine guidelines. Temporal trends in prepregnancy BMI status were examined, and maps were used to evaluate changes in excessive GWG in each Brazilian federation unit. On overall, prepregnancy overweight and obesity increased from 22.6% to 28.8% and from 9.8% to 19.8%, respectively, between 2008 and 2018. The prevalence of excessive GWG rose from 34.2% to 38.7% during the same period and in 11 of the 27 Brazilian federation units between 2008 and 2016. Women with underweight showed the highest values for mean total GWG for all the compared years (overall variation from 12.3 to 13.1 kg), followed by those with normal weight (11.9 to 12.5 kg), overweight (10.1 to 10.9 kg) and obesity (from 8.2 to 8.9 kg). Within each BMI group, values remained fairly stable throughout the studied period for first- and second-trimester GWG and total GWG. These results help to fill a significant gap in understanding the distribution of prepregnancy BMI and GWG in Brazilian women.

Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured in the first trimester are both used to estimate pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) but there is limited information on how they compare, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where access to a weight scale can be limited. Thus, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured during the first trimester of pregnancy among Brazilian women so as to assess whether self-reported pre-pregnancy weight is reliable and can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG. METHODS: Data from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium (BMCNC, n = 5563) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN, n = 393,095) were used to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weights measured in three overlapping intervals (30-94, 30-60 and 30-45 days of pregnancy) and their impact in BMI classification. We calculated intraclass correlation and Lin's concordance coefficients, constructed Bland and Altman plots, and determined Kappa coefficient for the categories of BMI. RESULTS: The mean of the differences between self-reported and measured weights was < 2 kg during the three intervals examined for BMCNC (1.42, 1.39 and 1.56 kg) and about 1 kg for SISVAN (1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 kg). Intraclass correlation and Lin's coefficient were > 0.90 for both datasets in all time intervals. Bland and Altman plots showed that the majority of the difference laid in the ±2 kg interval and that the differences did not vary according to measured first-trimester BMI. Kappa coefficient values were > 0.80 for both datasets at all intervals. Using self-reported pre-pregnancy or measured weight would change, in total, the classification of BMI in 15.9, 13.5, and 12.2% of women in the BMCNC and 12.1, 10.7, and 10.2% in the SISVAN, at 30-94, 30-60 and 30-45 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Brazil, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG when an early measurement of weight during pregnancy is not available. These results are especially important in a country where the majority of woman do not initiate prenatal care early in pregnancy.