Biomarkers of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an unpredictable event, and there are no specific biomarkers that can distinguish DILI from alternative explanations or predict its clinical outcomes. AREAS COVERED: This systematic review summarizes the available evidence for all biomarkers proposed to have a role in the diagnosis or prognosis of DILI. Following a comprehensive search, we included all types of studies in humans. We included DILI cases based on any threshold criteria but excluded intrinsic DILI, commonly caused by paracetamol overdose. We classified studies into diagnostic and prognostic categories and assessed their methodological quality. After reviewing the literature, 14 studies were eligible. EXPERT OPINION: Diagnostic studies were heterogeneous with regard to the study population and outcomes measured. Prognostic models were developed by integrating novel biomarkers, risk scores, and traditional biomarkers, which increased their prognostic ability to predict death or transplantation by 6 months. This systematic review highlights the case of need for non-genetic biomarkers that distinguish DILI from acute liver injury related to alternative etiology. Biomarkers with the potential to identify serious adverse outcomes from acute DILI should be validated in independent prospective cohorts with a substantial number of cases.

Oxidative Stress in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI): From Mechanisms to Biomarkers for Use in Clinical Practice.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a type of hepatic injury caused by an uncommon drug adverse reaction that can develop to conditions spanning from asymptomatic liver laboratory abnormalities to acute liver failure (ALF) and death. The cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in DILI are poorly understood. Hepatocyte damage can be caused by the metabolic activation of chemically active intermediate metabolites that covalently bind to macromolecules (e.g., proteins, DNA), forming protein adducts-neoantigens-that lead to the generation of oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which can eventually lead to cell death. In parallel, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) stimulate the immune response, whereby inflammasomes play a pivotal role, and neoantigen presentation on specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules trigger the adaptive immune response. A wide array of antioxidant mechanisms exists to counterbalance the effect of oxidants, including glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), which are pivotal in detoxification. These get compromised during DILI, triggering an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants defense systems, generating oxidative stress. As a result of exacerbated oxidative stress, several danger signals, including mitochondrial damage, cell death, and inflammatory markers, and microRNAs (miRNAs) related to extracellular vesicles (EVs) have already been reported as mechanistic biomarkers. Here, the status quo and the future directions in DILI are thoroughly discussed, with a special focus on the role of oxidative stress and the development of new biomarkers.

Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in the treatment of vascular anomalies: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The management of vascular anomalies is complex and requires a multidisciplinary team with a combination of medical, surgical, and intervention treatments. Medical treatment is limited and has conflicting results. Off-label use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors shows promising results. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the literature published about the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in the treatment of vascular anomalies. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was conducted using the PubMed database and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: There were 73 articles included: 2 randomized controlled studies, 2 nonrandomized prospective studies, and 69 retrospective case reports and case series. In total, 373 patients were included. Sirolimus was administered topically to 56 patients and orally to 317 patients. Sirolimus was highly effective in the treatment of vascular tumors associated with Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon (95.5% of the patients clinically improved and 93% had normalization of coagulopathy), venous malformations (size reduction was observed in 88.9% of patients), and lymphatic malformations (clinical improvement in 94.9% of patients). Topical sirolimus results were conflicting. Arteriovenous malformations were not improved by sirolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level evidence suggests that sirolimus can improve the prognosis of vascular anomalies, most notably vascular tumors associated with life-threatening coagulopathy and venous and lymphatic malformations. Further research is needed to establish the benefits of sirolimus in the management of vascular anomalies.

HAS-BLED Score Predicts the Risk of Major Bleeding in Chronic Anticoagulation after Lower Limb Surgical Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant drugs are sometimes used after lower limb surgical bypass to improve patency. There are no bleeding risk scores validated specifically for patients with peripheral arterial disease. The HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, history of or predisposition to bleeding, labile international normalized ratio (INR), elderly age [>65 years], and drugs or alcohol) score is a validated and frequently used tool to estimate the risk of major bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to access the efficacy of the HAS-BLED score in predicting bleeding risk after lower limb bypass revascularization. METHODS: This study involved "secondary analysis of a retrospective database that includes patients with lower limb revascularization that was anticoagulated with acenocoumarol after hospital discharge." Consecutive patients treated between January 2014 and May 2016 were included. Patients previously on anticoagulants and patients on hemodialysis were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included, 73.9% were males, with a mean age of 65 years. At 1-year follow-up, major bleeding occurred in 18.8% of patients. In this study, 52.1% of patients had HAS-BLED score ≥3. This subgroup had increased incidence of major bleeding: 33.3% compared to 0 risk factor (0%), 1 risk factor (0%), and 2 risk factors (4.2%) (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, HAS-BLED score presented good association with major bleeding risk. It can be used as a tool for decision-making for the prescription of anticoagulants after lower limb revascularization. The prevalence of high scores is substantial, presuming high bleeding risk in this high-risk population.

Epstein-Barr Virus and Astrocytoma.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is an established pathogen linked to a wide range of lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumors. Astrocytoma is one of the most frequent brain tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Astrocyte proliferation usually occurs after brain tissue aggression, which may be of different types, including viral infection. In particular, it has been suggested that EBV may play a role in astrocytoma pathogenesis. This article presents the summarized results of a systematic review of the literature on the relationship between EBV infection and astrocytoma pathophysiology. Although most studies detect the presence of EBV DNA in subsets of astrocytoma tumors, our conclusion is that currently, except for rare cases, there is no clear evidence that EBV plays a role in the development of astrocytoma.

Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban Compared to Acenocumarol after Infrainguinal Surgical Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Optimal antithrombotic therapy after lower limb infrainguinal revascularization remains a controversial topic. The use of anticoagulants, alone or in combination with antiplatelet drugs, can potentially improve patency rate and limb salvage, particularly in patients with risk factors for early thrombosis. Bleeding is the main complication of long-term anticoagulant use. New oral anticoagulants can represent an attractive alternative to the standard vitamin K antagonists. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness (bypass occlusion and major amputation) and safety (major bleeding and all-cause mortality) of rivaroxaban compared to acenocumarol after infrainguinal lower limb surgical revascularization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with peripheral arterial disease submitted to lower limb infrainguinal bypass revascularization with vein or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduit, who were anticoagulated with acenocumarol or rivaroxaban after hospital discharge. Patients with proximal revascularization, revascularization due to any pathology other than peripheral arterial disease, coagulation disorder, stroke or acute myocardial infarction in less than 30 days, glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min, or on hemodialysis were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were included (78.9% male), with a mean age of 64.8 years. After hospital discharge, 40 patients (36.7%) were medicated with rivaroxaban and 69 patients (63.3%) with acenocumarol. At 1 year of follow-up, patients under rivaroxaban and acenocumarol presented comparable major amputation rates (12.5 % vs. 10.1%, P = 0.756), bypass occlusion (22.5% vs. 24.6 %, P = 0.769), and mortality rate (10% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.756). Major bleeding occurred in 13.8% of patients. Patients with renal dysfunction had significantly higher bleeding risk with acenocumarol (45.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.028) compared to rivaroxaban, while patients with normal renal function presented similar bleeding rates with both anticoagulants (6.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.953). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban has equivalent effectiveness to acenocumarol after infrainguinal bypass revascularization, with similar occlusion, major amputation, and mortality rates. Rivaroxaban has an improved safety profile in patients with moderate renal dysfunction due to a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding. In patients with normal renal function, rivaroxaban and acenocumarol present equivalent major bleeding rates.