Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 73(1): 94-6, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22424900

ABSTRACT

We compared the performance of 8 Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassays to cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and toxigenic culture. The effect of strain type on assay performance was also examined. There were a total of 71 (14.4%) samples in which C. difficile was recovered; 58 (81.7%) of 71 were toxigenic. Compared to a composite reference standard of either C. difficile cytotoxin assay positive or toxigenic C. difficile culture positive, the sensitivities of these assays varied from 31.7% to 55.2%, while the specificities were excellent, ranging from 98.1% to 100%. Among the 57 C. difficile isolates, 30 (51.7%) were of the NAP1 genotype. Stool samples positive for the C. difficile NAP1 strain had a higher positivity rate for the toxin assays.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Bacterial Toxins/toxicity , Cell Culture Techniques/methods , Cell Survival , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Feces/chemistry , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...