Risk factors for elective and urgent open conversion after EVAR-a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the standard procedure for treating infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Various associated complications can lead to open conversion (OC). Thorough follow-up after the procedure is mandatory for the early detection of complications. Persisting perfusion of the aneurysm, a so-called endoleak (EL), paired with structural instability because of aortic wall atrophy and impaired cell functionality induced by EVAR, results in a high risk for aortic rupture. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to detect the risk factors for elective and urgent OC as a result of EVAR-induced pathophysiological changes inside the aortic wall. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis was performed on all open aortic repairs from January 2016 to December 2020. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Fifty patients were identified as treated by OC for failure of an infrarenal EVAR. The patients were divided into two subgroups, here depending on the urgency of surgery. Statistical analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes was performed. RESULTS: The most common indications for OC were various types of EL (74%), resulting in an aortic rupture in 15 patients. Patients with insufficient or absent follow-up were treated more frequently in an emergency setting (16% vs. 63%). The mortality rate was higher in cases of emergency OC (3% vs. 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Particularly in cases of insufficient or absent follow-up, complications such as EL pose an enormous risk for fatal aortic rupture.

Inflammation of the rectal remnant endangers the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation of the rectal remnant may affect the postoperative outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to determine the extent of inflammation in the anastomotic area during IPAA and to investigate the impact of proctitis on postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-four UC patients with primary IPAA were included in this retrospective case-control study. The histopathologic degree of inflammation in the anastomotic area was graded into three stages of no proctitis ("NOP"), mild to medium proctitis ("MIP"), and severe proctitis ("SEP"). Preoperative risk factors, 30-day morbidity, and follow-up data were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed in the event of pouch failure. RESULTS: The prevalence of proctitis was high (MIP 40.4%, and SEP 42.8%). During follow-up, the incidence of complications was highest among SEP: resulting in re-intervention (n = 40; 28.2%, p = 0.017), pouchitis (n = 36; 25.2%, p < 0.01), and pouch failure (n = 32; 22.4%, p = 0.032). The time interval to pouch failure was 5.0 (4.0-6.9) years among NOP, and 1.2 (0.5-2.3) years in SEP (p = 0.036). ASA 3, pouchitis, and pouch fistula were independent risk factors for pouch failure. CONCLUSION: Proctitis at the time of IPAA is common. A high degree of inflammation is associated with poor long-term outcomes, an effect that declines over time. In addition, a higher degree of proctitis leads to earlier pouch failure.

Risk factors for failure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the standard surgical procedure for ulcerative colitis refractory to medical treatment. In a few cases, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis cannot be completed due to intraoperative technical problems. The aim of this single-center study was to identify risk factors for a technically failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: In total, 391 patients with ulcerative colitis who received ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were identified. Clinical and perioperative data from patients with successful ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA+) were compared to data from failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA-). Definition of failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was intraoperative failure to perform ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Risk factors for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were assessed by logistic regression. Cut-off values were calculated on the basis of receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden Index. RESULTS: The rate of failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was 26 of 391 (6.6%). In 22 of 26 cases (84.6%), there was an insufficient length of the small intestinal mesentery. Patients with failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were more often male (80.8% vs 54.5%, P = .009), older (47.1 ± 14.1 vs 39.2 ± 12.8 years, P = .007), had a higher body mass index 27.2 ± 4.5 vs 23.7 ± 4.3 kg/m2, P < .001), and had extraintestinal manifestations more frequently (65.4% vs 26.3%, P < .001). Further risk factors for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were hypertension and Cushing's syndrome. CONCLUSION: Technical failure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is elevated in patients with higher body mass index, with refractory ulcerative colitis, and/or extended immunosuppressive medication. Three-staged ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and optimizing preoperative conditions may help to elevate the rate of successful ileoanal pouch construction in these patients.

Aortic Foreign Body Caused by Rupture of Endobag after EVAS Using the Nellix Aneurysm Sealing System-A Case Report.

The Nellix aneurysm sealing system aims at sealing the cavity of the sac of the aneurysm, to reduce typical complications such as migration or endoleak. We report on a case of a unique device-associated complication: rupture and displacement of the filling material into the aortic lumen, causing peripheral ischemia and imminent renal and visceral occlusion, in a patient with anastomotic ulcer after an open aortobiiliac bypass and calcified and tortuous iliac arteries. The material was removed by open surgery. The patient recovered completely. The device should be handled with great caution in cases with hostile access routes, and in secondary interventions.