ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aims to review and compare the clinical presentation, management, and outcome in patients with tumor-related (TR) and nontumor-related (NTR) aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) and aorto-bronchial fistula (ABF) with particular focus on the thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 16 consecutive patients with TR (n = 8) and NTR (n = 8), ABF (n = 6), and AEF (n = 10) admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2019. RESULTS: The median age was 62 years (range 46-81), with 11 men. The most common predisposing factor was esophageal or gastric cardia cancer (n = 6), followed by open repair of the thoracic aorta (n = 5). Endoluminal vacuum therapy (Endo-SPONGE®) accounted for 3 cases of AEFs. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was applied in 13 patients (4 with ABFs and 9 with AEFs). The primary technical success of the TEVARs was 100%. One patient (8%) was complicated with postoperative middle cerebral artery syndrome and left-sided hemiparesis. The respective in-hospital, 6-month, and 1-year mortality rates were 0% (n = 0), 25% (n = 2), and 25% (n = 2) for the NTR group and 63% (n = 5), 88% (n = 7), and 100% (n = 8) for the TR group. After a mean period of 13 months, 5 (31%) patients were still alive, and one patient lost to follow-up after 11 months. The survivors (n = 5) had all nontumor-related ABF. Progression of underlying cancer and hemodynamic shock were the most common causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR represents a reliable option in the treatment of NTR ABFs. In the cases of TR fistulas and NTR AEFs, TEVAR should be applied more selectively. The associated mortality remains very high.
Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Bronchial Fistula/surgery , Endovascular Procedures , Esophageal Fistula/surgery , Thoracic Neoplasms/complications , Vascular Fistula/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/etiology , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Bronchial Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Bronchial Fistula/etiology , Bronchial Fistula/mortality , Clinical Decision-Making , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Esophageal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Fistula/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Thoracic Neoplasms/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Fistula/etiology , Vascular Fistula/mortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report and analyze the indications and results of endovascular and open surgical treatment for uretero-arterial fistula. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 25 consecutive patients with uretero-arterial fistulas admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2020. Endpoints were technical success, freedom from open conversion, stent-graft/graft-related complications, and 30-day and one-year mortality. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients (68% female, n = 17) with 27 uretero-arterial fistulas by bilateral pathologies in two patients. The mean age was 61 ± 11 years (range 35-80). The most common predisposing factors for uretero-arterial fistula were history of pelvic operations for malignancy in 21 patients (84%), radiotherapy in 21 patients (84%), previous pelvic vascular bypass in 2 patients (8%), and iliac aneurysms in 2 patients (8%). On average, the period between the primary pelvic surgery and the diagnosis of uretero-arterial fistulas was 46 months (range 7-255). Twenty patients (80%) underwent endovascular treatment of the uretero-arterial fistulas. The primary technical success of the endovascular treatment was 95%, and the freedom from open conversion was 40% at six months and 30% at one year. Thirteen uretero-arterial fistulas (48%) underwent delayed open conversion due to recurrent bleeding in six cases (46%), stent-graft infection in three cases (23%), or pelvic abscess in four cases (31%). Primary open surgery was applied for five (20%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, early (<30 days) mortality was 8% (2/25), one-year mortality 16% (4/25), and overall mortality was 24% (6/25). CONCLUSIONS: Uretero-arterial fistula is a late complication of prior pelvic surgery, radiation, and indwelling ureteral stents. Endovascular treatment remains an effective and less invasive modality in controlling the related life-threatening arterial bleeding of the uretero-arterial fistula. Open surgical treatment is still required for patients with local sepsis, previously failed endovascular treatment or infected stent-grafts.
