ABSTRACT
Purpose: The Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids (CHECK) project targets publically insured children and young adults with chronic diseases. The CHECK oral health program intervenes at individual, family, and community levels. This paper describes the baseline oral health status of CHECK patients. Methods: CHECK patients older than 18 years of age and caretakers of younger patients were asked about their oral health. Medicaid claims data were used to determine diagnoses and level of risk. Attendance data from the Chicago Public Schools was obtained to assess absenteeism. Results: Of the 5,509 CHECK patients, 1,122 (20.4%) reported some type of oral health problem in the last six months. The most common issue was a history of dental caries (N=753, 13.7%). The odds of oral health problems increased significantly in adolescents (odds ratio [OR]=1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.02 to 1.40) and young adults (OR=1.55; 95% CI=1.31 to 1.85) compared with children. Males were less likely than females to have oral health problems (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.73 to 0.95). Worse general health was significantly associated with oral health problems. Conclusion: CHECK is implementing a multilevel comprehensive approach to address oral health problems.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Chicago , Child , Child, Preschool , Community Health Workers , Dental Care for Children , Dental Caries/diagnosis , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Schools , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A panel of experts convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs presents evidence-based clinical recommendations regarding professionally applied and prescription-strength, home-use topical fluoride agents for caries prevention. These recommendations are an update of the 2006 ADA recommendations regarding professionally applied topical fluoride and were developed by using a new process that includes conducting a systematic review of primary studies. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors conducted a search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for clinical trials of professionally applied and prescription-strength topical fluoride agents--including mouthrinses, varnishes, gels, foams and pastes--with caries increment outcomes published in English through October 2012. RESULTS: The panel included 71 trials from 82 articles in its review and assessed the efficacy of various topical fluoride caries-preventive agents. The panel makes recommendations for further research. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The panel recommends the following for people at risk of developing dental caries: 2.26 percent fluoride varnish or 1.23 percent fluoride (acidulated phosphate fluoride) gel, or a prescription-strength, home-use 0.05 percent fluoride gel or paste or 0.09 percent fluoride mouthrinse for patients 6 years or older. Only 2.26 percent fluoride varnish is recommended for children younger than 6 years. The strengths of the recommendations for the recommended products varied from "in favor" to "expert opinion for." As part of the evidence-based approach to care, these clinical recommendations should be integrated with the practitioner's professional judgment and the patient's needs and preferences.
