Factors associated with delayed screening of contacts of tuberculosis cases in the Somme, France.

AIM: To analyze the factors associated with the time to initiating tuberculosis contact investigations in the Somme department, France. METHODS: All reported tuberculosis cases and all their contacts screened between 2007 and 2011 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with a "system delay"≤1 month and a "contact delay"≤0 days. RESULTS: The mean time between the mandatory notification of a case of tuberculosis and the date set for the contact's screening (system delay) was 35.3 days and the average time between that date and when the contact was actually screened (contact delay) was 12.5 days. In multivariate analysis, a smear-positive sputum sample (OR: 3.68; 95% CI: 1.63-8.30) and a diagnosis at the university hospital (OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.14-5.96) were significantly associated with a system delay≤1 month. A smear-positive sputum sample (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.08-1.69), male gender (OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01-1.49), being born in a foreign country (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.02-1.69), being a family member (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05-1.77), or being another type of close contact of the case (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.81-3.36) were significantly associated with a contact delay≤0 days. CONCLUSION: System and contact delays were longer than recommended, and the factors associated with the lengthening of these delays need to be taken into account.

Factors associated with time to mandatory tuberculosis notification in the Somme department, France.

BACKGROUND: The associated factors contributing to a delay in mandatory tuberculosis notification in the Somme department, France, are not yet known. The objective of this study was to analyze these factors. METHODS: All reported cases of tuberculosis between 2007 and 2011 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the factors associated with a short time to notification, i.e., ≤48h. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2011, a total of 175 cases of tuberculosis were reported to the Somme Regional Health Agency. Of the 145 (83.8%) cases of tuberculosis with at least one pulmonary location, 57.7% had a positive sputum smear. The mean time between the diagnosis of tuberculosis and mandatory notification was 6.1 days. It was 2.6 days for tuberculosis cases with a positive sputum smear versus 8.3 days for cases with a negative sputum smear; 2.0 days for severe cases and 6.3 days for simpler forms. In multivariate analysis, only a positive sputum smear was significantly associated with a short time to mandatory notification (OR 2.44; 95%CI 1.18-5.00; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: The time to mandatory notification is longer than recommended. Better collaboration between the parties involved in tuberculosis control and their continuing medical education could reduce this delay in the Somme department.

Diagnosis and follow-up of genital chlamydial infection by direct methods and by detection of serum IgG, IgA and secretory IgA.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-risk population by direct and indirect methods and to evaluate the diagnosis of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Urethral or endocervical specimens from 78 patients (48 females and 30 males) were examined by cell culture, direct fluorescence assay, PCR Cobas Amplicor (Roche Molecular Diagnostics), and sIgA was detected by the recombinant lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-enzyme-linked immunoassay (rELISA). Serum from each patient was also obtained and analysed for the presence of IgG and IgA antibody by in-house microimmunofluorescence (MIF) and by the rELISA method (Medac, Hamburg, Germany). RESULTS: The overall C. trachomatis prevalence determined by direct methods was 28%. The detection of sIgA antibodies was significantly higher in the group of patients with a positive direct detection (50%) than in the group of negative direct detection (10.7%). The Chlamydia-specific IgA antibodies were detected by the rELISA in 40.9 and 53.6% of group I (positive direct detection) and group II patients (negative direct detection), respectively. The species-specific IgA antibodies were detected by the MIF method in 18.2 and 16.1% of group I and II patients, respectively. Chlamydia genus-specific IgG antibodies were detected by the rELISA in 86.4 and 83.9% of group I and group II patients and, C. trachomatis specific IgG were present in 81.8 and 73.2% of group I and group II patients, respectively, as assessed by the MIF test. CONCLUSION: Combining the positive direct methods and/or positive sIgA antibody results from cervical or urethral specimens had an indication of current C. trachomatis infection.