Effects of bispectral index monitoring on recovery from surgical anesthesia in 1,580 inpatients from an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether monitoring Bispectral Index (BIS) would affect recovery parameters in patients undergoing inpatient surgery. METHODS: Anesthesia providers (n = 69) were randomly assigned to one of two groups, a BIS or non-BIS control group. A randomized crossover design was used, with reassignment at monthly intervals for 7 months. Duration of time in the postanesthesia care unit, time from the end of surgery to leaving the operating room, and incidence of delayed recovery (> 50 min in recovery) were compared in patients treated intraoperatively with or without BIS monitoring. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance, unpaired t test, or chi-square test as appropriate. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred eighty patients in an academic medical center were studied. The mean BIS in the monitored group was 47. No differences were found in recovery parameters between the BIS-monitored group and the control group when comparisons were made using all subjects or when data were analyzed within anesthetic subgroups stratified by anesthetic agent or duration of anesthesia. There were some small reductions in the intraoperative concentration of sevoflurane (but not isoflurane). CONCLUSIONS: The use of BIS monitoring for inpatients undergoing a wide variety of surgical procedures in an academic medical center had some minor effects on intraoperative anesthetic use but had no impact on recovery parameters.

Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain.

OBJECTIVE: This research was designed to test the hypothesis that presurgery "catastrophizing" would predict postsurgical pain and postsurgical analgesic consumption. METHODS: A sample of 48 individuals who underwent anterior cruciate ligament repair participated in the study. All participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (described by Sullivan et al in 1995) prior to surgery. Measures of pain (pain scores on a scale of 0-10) were obtained in the postanesthetic care unit, as well as 1, 2, and 7 days after surgery. Opioid and nonopioid analgesic consumption was tabulated while patients were in the hospital and after discharge. RESULTS: Results showed that the Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of acute postsurgical pain in the postanesthetic care unit (r = 0.48, P = 0.004 for maximum pain in the postanesthetic care unit). Maximum pain ratings in patients with high Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores (> median of 13) were 33% to 74% higher numerically than in patients with low Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores (< or = median), and the duration of moderate-severe pain (>3/10) was more prolonged (45 minutes versus 28 minutes in patients with high and low Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores, respectively; P < 0.05). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was also predictive of pain with activity at 24 hours (r = 0.65 for pain on walking, P < or = 0.0001). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale did not predict postoperative analgesic use. CONCLUSION: The pattern of findings suggests that high catastrophizing scores may be a risk factor for heightened pain following surgery. Clinical and theoretical implications of the findings are addressed.

Resident training level and quality of anesthesia care in a university hospital.

UNLABELLED: In this study, we analyzed the relationship between resident training and patient safety in anesthesia. A retrospective quality improvement database review was used to calculate the relative risk of any quality problem and specific types of quality problems (injury, escalation of care, or operational inefficiency) between anesthesia teams with CA1, CA2, and CA3 residents. It was expected that teams with less experienced residents (CA1) would have more frequent quality problems than teams with more experienced residents (CA2 and CA3 teams). Data showed that risk of injury did not differ between CA1, CA2, and CA3 teams. CA2 teams had higher rates of critical incidents and escalation of care than CA1 and CA3 teams and higher rates of operational inefficiency than CA3 teams. The CA2 yr is when residents move into specialty training, requiring more advanced skills and a larger knowledge base. Their higher relative risk for critical incidents, escalation of care, and operational inefficiencies may reflect lack of experience, uncertainty, and less skill mastery compared with CA3 residents. The higher inefficiency and escalation of care rates associated with CA2 teams may translate into larger costs for the institution. IMPLICATIONS: Appropriate supervision of anesthesia residents helps to ensure patient safety. Anesthesia management problems are most common during the CA2 yr and result in higher costs for the institution.

Unexpected surgical difficulties leading to hemorrhage and gas embolus during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a case report.

PURPOSE: To report the case of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in which the preoperative evaluation of the patient gave no indication of the surgical difficulties that were encountered intraoperatively, resulting in substantial bleeding, a suspected gas embolism, and emergency conversion of the procedure from laparoscopic to open donor nephrectomy. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 59-yr-old man - height: 175 cm, weight: 85.5 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I - presented as kidney donor for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. He was healthy, on no medication, and had no previous abdominal surgery or diseases of the urinary tract. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan evaluation of his kidneys confirmed this by reporting a normal bilateral renal and renal vascular anatomy. In contradiction to the preoperative CT scan findings, the surgeon discovered abnormalities in the operative field. This included extensive scarring surrounding the left kidney, adenopathy near the right hilum, and a large branch lumbar vein entering the renal vein. The large branch lumbar vein was clipped but the clips dislodged, causing significant blood loss, and a suspected gas embolus. The procedure was converted to an emergency open donor nephrectomy. Postoperatively the patient made a full recovery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomies, though usually performed on healthy individuals, have their pitfalls, and complications during this procedure can be sudden and serious. As shown in this case, although CT scan results are regarded as reliable, they can be misleading. As an anesthetic precaution for possible gas emboli during laparoscopic procedures, nitrous oxide should be avoided and the patient be ventilated with 100% oxygen.

Sustained increases in productivity with maintenance of quality in an academic anesthesia practice.

UNLABELLED: Previously, the authors reported trends in anesthesia quality and productivity in a university-based anesthesia practice as it responded to increasing service demands with shortages of qualified staff and decreasing reimbursement. From 1992 to 1997, productivity increased, with a significant decrease in patient injury. In this study, we analyzed whether previous productivity and quality gains were sustained from 1998 to 2000 despite continued staff shortages. Productivity, caseload, and outcome data were abstracted from departmental administrative and quality-improvement reports. Retrospective cohort analysis compared trends during 3 yr of moderate productivity (1994-1996) with those during 3 yr of high productivity (1998-2000). The mean monthly productivity in 1998-2000 (15 +/- 0.6 billed hours per attending per clinical day) was larger than levels from 1994 to 1996 (mean, 14 +/- 0.7 h; P < 0.01). The overall continuous quality improvement report rate was slower at larger productivity levels, as were rates of patient injuries. When adjusted for declining report rates, patient injury rates showed no change between smaller- and larger-productivity years. Adjusted rates of operational inefficiencies and human errors were more frequent at larger productivity levels. Although the pressures of increased demands, shrinking resources, and shortages of qualified academic anesthesiologists have not abated, productivity and quality have been sustained. Future management must be directed toward reductions in operational inefficiencies and human error. IMPLICATIONS: Our academic anesthesia service sustained increases in productivity with maintenance of quality. During a 3-yr period of high productivity, patient injury rates did not increase compared with prior years with lower productivity.