Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 3276, 2023 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37280242

ABSTRACT

Lumbar central pattern generators (CPGs) control the basic rhythm and coordinate muscle activation underlying hindlimb locomotion in quadrupedal mammals. The existence and function of CPGs in humans have remained controversial. Here, we investigated a case of a male individual with complete thoracic spinal cord injury who presented with a rare form of self-sustained rhythmic spinal myoclonus in the legs and rhythmic activities induced by epidural electrical stimulation (EES). Analysis of muscle activation patterns suggested that the myoclonus tapped into spinal circuits that generate muscle spasms, rather than reflecting locomotor CPG activity as previously thought. The EES-induced patterns were fundamentally different in that they included flexor-extensor and left-right alternations, hallmarks of locomotor CPGs, and showed spontaneous errors in rhythmicity. These motor deletions, with preserved cycle frequency and period when rhythmic activity resumed, were previously reported only in animal studies and suggest a separation between rhythm generation and pattern formation. Spinal myoclonus and the EES-induced activity demonstrate that the human lumbar spinal cord contains distinct mechanisms for generating rhythmic multi-muscle patterns.


Subject(s)
Central Pattern Generators , Myoclonus , Spinal Cord Injuries , Animals , Male , Humans , Spinal Cord/physiology , Locomotion/physiology , Hindlimb , Central Pattern Generators/physiology , Mammals
2.
Brain Sci ; 11(4)2021 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33917893

ABSTRACT

Gait dysfunction and spasticity are common debilitating consequences of multiple sclerosis (MS). Improvements of these motor impairments by lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) have been demonstrated in spinal cord injury. Here, we explored for the first time the motor effects of lumbar tSCS applied at 50 Hz for 30 min in 16 individuals with MS and investigated their temporal persistence post-intervention. We used a comprehensive protocol assessing walking ability, different presentations of spasticity, standing ability, manual dexterity, and trunk control. Walking ability, including walking speed and endurance, was significantly improved for two hours beyond the intervention and returned to baseline after 24 h. Muscle spasms, clonus duration, and exaggerated stretch reflexes were reduced for two hours, and clinically assessed lower-extremity muscle hypertonia remained at improved levels for 24 h post-intervention. Further, postural sway during normal standing with eyes open was decreased for two hours. No changes were detected in manual dexterity and trunk control. Our results suggest that transcutaneous lumbar SCS can serve as a clinically accessible method without known side effects that holds the potential for substantial clinical benefit across the disability spectrum of MS.

3.
iScience ; 24(1): 101930, 2021 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409476

ABSTRACT

Epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord is an emergent strategy for the neurological recovery of lower-extremity motor function. Motoneuron pools are thought to be recruited by stimulation of posterior roots. Here, we linked electromyographic data of epidurally evoked lower-extremity responses of 34 individuals with upper motoneuron disorders to a population model of the spinal cord constructed using anatomical parameters of thousands of individuals. We identified a relationship between segmental stimulation sites and activated spinal cord segments, which made spinal motor mapping from epidural space possible despite the complex anatomical interface imposed by the posterior roots. Our statistical approach provided evidence for low-threshold sites of posterior roots and effects of monopolar and bipolar stimulation previously predicted by computer modeling and allowed us to test the impact of different upper motoneuron disorders on the evoked responses. Finally, we revealed a statistical association between intraoperative and postoperative mapping of the spinal cord.

4.
Brain Sci ; 11(1)2021 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33467053

ABSTRACT

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) applied over the human lumbosacral spinal cord provides access to afferent fibers from virtually all lower-extremity nerves. These afferents connect to spinal networks that play a pivotal role in the control of locomotion. Studying EES-evoked responses mediated through these networks can identify some of their functional components. We here analyzed electromyographic (EMG) responses evoked by low-frequency (2-6 Hz) EES derived from eight individuals with chronic, motor complete spinal cord injury. We identified and separately analyzed three previously undescribed response types: first, crossed reflexes with onset latencies of ~55 ms evoked in the hamstrings; second, oligosynaptic reflexes within 50 ms post-stimulus superimposed on the monosynaptic posterior root-muscle reflexes in the flexor muscle tibialis anterior, but with higher thresholds and no rate-sensitive depression; third, polysynaptic responses with variable EMG shapes within 50-450 ms post-stimulus evoked in the tibialis anterior and triceps surae, some of which demonstrated consistent changes in latencies with graded EES. Our observations suggest the activation of commissural neurons, lumbar propriospinal interneurons, and components of the late flexion reflex circuits through group I and II proprioceptive afferent inputs. These potential neural underpinnings have all been related to spinal locomotion in experimental studies.

5.
J Neurotrauma ; 37(3): 481-493, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31333064

ABSTRACT

Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is currently regarded as a breakthrough procedure for enabling movement after spinal cord injury (SCI), yet one of its original applications was for spinal spasticity. An emergent method that activates similar target neural structures non-invasively is transcutaneous SCS. Its clinical value for spasticity control would depend on inducing carry-over effects, because the surface-electrode-based approach cannot be applied chronically. We evaluated single-session effects of transcutaneous lumbar SCS in 12 individuals with SCI by a test-battery approach, before, immediately after and 2 h after intervention. Stimulation was applied for 30 min at 50 Hz with an intensity sub-threshold for eliciting reflexes in lower extremity muscles. The tests included evaluations of stretch-induced spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS] sum score, pendulum test, electromyography-based evaluation of tonic stretch reflexes), clonus, cutaneous-input-evoked spasms, and the timed 10 m walk test. Across participants, the MAS sum score, clonus, and spasms were significantly reduced immediately after SCS, and all spasticity measures were improved 2 h post-intervention, with large effect sizes and including clinically meaningful improvements. The effect on walking speed varied across individuals. We further conducted a single-case multi-session study over 6 weeks to explore the applicability of transcutaneous SCS as a home-based therapy. Self-application of the intervention was successful; weekly evaluations suggested progressively improving therapeutic effects during the active period and carry-over effects for 7 days. Our results suggest that transcutaneous SCS can be a viable non-pharmacological option for managing spasticity, likely working through enhancing pre- and post-synaptic spinal inhibitory mechanisms, and may additionally serve to identify responders to treatments with epidural SCS.


Subject(s)
Muscle Spasticity/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Spasticity/diagnosis , Muscle Spasticity/etiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
6.
PLoS One ; 14(12): e0227057, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31877192

ABSTRACT

Posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes are short-latency spinal reflexes evoked by epidural or transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in clinical and physiological studies. PRM reflexes share key physiological characteristics with the H reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of large-diameter muscle spindle afferents in the tibial nerve. Here, we compared the H reflex and the PRM reflex of soleus in response to transcutaneous stimulation by studying their recovery cycles in ten neurologically intact volunteers and ten individuals with traumatic, chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The recovery cycles of the reflexes, i.e., the time course of their excitability changes, were assessed by paired pulses with conditioning-test intervals of 20-5000 ms. Between the subject groups, no statistical difference was found for the recovery cycles of the H reflexes, yet those of the PRM reflexes differed significantly, with a striking suppression in the intact group. When comparing the reflex types, they did not differ in the SCI group, while the PRM reflexes were more strongly depressed in the intact group for durations characteristic for presynaptic inhibition. These differences may arise from the concomitant stimulation of several posterior roots containing afferent fibers of various lower extremity nerves by transcutaneous SCS, producing multi-source heteronymous presynaptic inhibition, and the collective dysfunction of inhibitory mechanisms after SCI contributing to spasticity. PRM-reflex recovery cycles additionally obtained for bilateral rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus all demonstrated a stronger suppression in the intact group. Within both subject groups, the thigh muscles showed a stronger recovery than the lower leg muscles, which may reflect a characteristic difference in motor control of diverse muscles. Based on the substantial difference between intact and SCI individuals, PRM-reflex depression tested with paired pulses could become a sensitive measure for spasticity and motor recovery.


Subject(s)
H-Reflex , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Reflex , Spinal Cord/physiology , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
7.
PLoS One ; 13(1): e0192013, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29381748

ABSTRACT

Epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord is currently regaining momentum as a neuromodulation intervention in spinal cord injury (SCI) to modify dysregulated sensorimotor functions and augment residual motor capacity. There is ample evidence that it engages spinal circuits through the electrical stimulation of large-to-medium diameter afferent fibers within lumbar and upper sacral posterior roots. Recent pilot studies suggested that the surface electrode-based method of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may produce similar neuromodulatory effects as caused by epidural SCS. Neurophysiological and computer modeling studies proposed that this noninvasive technique stimulates posterior-root fibers as well, likely activating similar input structures to the spinal cord as epidural stimulation. Here, we add a yet missing piece of evidence substantiating this assumption. We conducted in-depth analyses and direct comparisons of the electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of short-latency responses in multiple leg muscles to both stimulation techniques derived from ten individuals with SCI each. Post-activation depression of responses evoked by paired pulses applied either epidurally or transcutaneously confirmed the reflex nature of the responses. The muscle responses to both techniques had the same latencies, EMG peak-to-peak amplitudes, and waveforms, except for smaller responses with shorter onset latencies in the triceps surae muscle group and shorter offsets of the responses in the biceps femoris muscle during epidural stimulation. Responses obtained in three subjects tested with both methods at different time points had near-identical waveforms per muscle group as well as same onset latencies. The present results strongly corroborate the activation of common neural input structures to the lumbar spinal cord-predominantly primary afferent fibers within multiple posterior roots-by both techniques and add to unraveling the basic mechanisms underlying electrical SCS.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Reflex , Spinal Cord/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
8.
J Neurophysiol ; 114(1): 400-10, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25904708

ABSTRACT

In individuals with motor-complete spinal cord injury, epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord at 2 Hz evokes unmodulated reflexes in the lower limbs, while stimulation at 22-60 Hz can generate rhythmic burstlike activity. Here we elaborated on an output pattern emerging at transitional stimulation frequencies with consecutively elicited reflexes alternating between large and small. We analyzed responses concomitantly elicited in thigh and leg muscle groups bilaterally by epidural stimulation in eight motor-complete spinal cord-injured individuals. Periodic amplitude modulation of at least 20 successive responses occurred in 31.4% of all available data sets with stimulation frequency set at 5-26 Hz, with highest prevalence at 16 Hz. It could be evoked in a single muscle group only but was more strongly expressed and consistent when occurring in pairs of antagonists or in the same muscle group bilaterally. Latencies and waveforms of the modulated reflexes corresponded to those of the unmodulated, monosynaptic responses to 2-Hz stimulation. We suggest that the cyclical changes of reflex excitability resulted from the interaction of facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms emerging after specific delays and with distinct durations, including postactivation depression, recurrent inhibition and facilitation, as well as reafferent feedback activation. The emergence of large responses within the patterns at a rate of 5.5/s or 8/s may further suggest the entrainment of spinal mechanisms as involved in clonus. The study demonstrates that the human lumbosacral spinal cord can organize a simple form of rhythmicity through the repetitive activation of spinal reflex circuits.


Subject(s)
Reflex/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Leg/physiopathology , Lumbosacral Region , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Young Adult
9.
Brain ; 138(Pt 3): 577-88, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25582580

ABSTRACT

Constant drive provided to the human lumbar spinal cord by epidural electrical stimulation can cause local neural circuits to generate rhythmic motor outputs to lower limb muscles in people paralysed by spinal cord injury. Epidural spinal cord stimulation thus allows the study of spinal rhythm and pattern generating circuits without their configuration by volitional motor tasks or task-specific peripheral feedback. To reveal spinal locomotor control principles, we studied the repertoire of rhythmic patterns that can be generated by the functionally isolated human lumbar spinal cord, detected as electromyographic activity from the legs, and investigated basic temporal components shared across these patterns. Ten subjects with chronic, motor-complete spinal cord injury were studied. Surface electromyographic responses to lumbar spinal cord stimulation were collected from quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and triceps surae in the supine position. From these data, 10-s segments of rhythmic activity present in the four muscle groups of one limb were extracted. Such samples were found in seven subjects. Physiologically adequate cycle durations and relative extension- and flexion-phase durations similar to those needed for locomotion were generated. The multi-muscle activation patterns exhibited a variety of coactivation, mixed-synergy and locomotor-like configurations. Statistical decomposition of the electromyographic data across subjects, muscles and samples of rhythmic patterns identified three common temporal components, i.e. basic or shared activation patterns. Two of these basic patterns controlled muscles to contract either synchronously or alternatingly during extension- and flexion-like phases. The third basic pattern contributed to the observed muscle activities independently from these extensor- and flexor-related basic patterns. Each bifunctional muscle group was able to express both extensor- and flexor-patterns, with variable ratios across the samples of rhythmic patterns. The basic activation patterns can be interpreted as central drives implemented by spinal burst generators that impose specific spatiotemporally organized activation on the lumbosacral motor neuron pools. Our data thus imply that the human lumbar spinal cord circuits can form burst-generating elements that flexibly combine to obtain a wide range of locomotor outputs from a constant, repetitive input. It may be possible to use this flexibility to incorporate specific adaptations to gait and stance to improve locomotor control, even after severe central nervous system damage.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Movement Disorders/etiology , Movement Disorders/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Biophysics , Chi-Square Distribution , Electromyography , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Periodicity , Spinal Cord/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Young Adult
10.
Neuromodulation ; 17(2): 180-7, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24320718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) for chronic low back pain (cLBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter observational study, 118 patients were admitted to 11 centers throughout Austria and Switzerland. After a screening visit, all patients underwent a trial stimulation period of at least seven days before implantation of the permanent system. Leads were placed in the subcutaneous tissues of the lower back directly in the region of greatest pain. One hundred five patients were implanted with a permanent stimulating system. Patients' evaluation of pain and functional levels were completed before implantation and one, three, and six months after implantation. Adverse events, medication usage, and coverage of the painful area and predictive value of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) were monitored. RESULTS: All pain and quality-of-life measures showed statistically significant improvement during the treatment period. These included the average pain visual analog scale, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Becks Depression Inventory, and the Short Form-12 item Health survey. Additionally, medication usage with opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anti-convulsants showed a highly significant reduction. Complications requiring surgical intervention were reported in 9.6% of the patients. The degree of coverage of painful areas seems to be an important criterion for efficacy of PNFS, whereas TENS is presumably no predictor. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter study confirms that PNFS is an effective therapy for the management of cLBP. Significant improvements in many aspects of the pain condition were measured, and complications were minimal.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/therapy , Pain Measurement/methods , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL