Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Confl Health ; 12: 2, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29387145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Provision of Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care (EmONC) reduces maternal mortality and should include three components: Basic Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care (BEmONC) offered at primary care level, Comprehensive EmONC (CEmONC) at secondary level and a good referral system in-between. In a conflict-affected province of Afghanistan (Khost), we assessed the performance of an Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) run CEmONC hospital without a primary care and referral system. Performance was assessed in terms of hospital utilisation for obstetric emergencies and quality of obstetric care. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using routine programme data (2013-2014). RESULTS: Of 29,876 admissions, 99% were self-referred, 0.4% referred by traditional birth attendants and 0.3% by health facilities. Geographic origins involved clustering around the hospital vicinity and the provincial road axis. While there was a steady increase in hospital caseload, the number and proportion of women with Direct Obstetric Complications (DOC) progressively dropped from 21% to 8% over 2 years. Admissions for normal deliveries continuously increased. In-hospital maternal deaths were 0.03%, neonatal deaths 1% and DOC case-fatality rate 0.2% (all within acceptable limits). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high and ever increasing caseload, good quality Comprehensive EmONC could be offered in a conflict-affected setting in rural Afghanistan. However, the primary emergency role of the hospital is challenged by diversion of resources to normal deliveries that should happen at primary level. Strengthening Basic EmONC facilities and establishing an efficient referral system are essential to improve access for emergency cases and increase the potential impact on maternal mortality.

2.
Int Health ; 7(3): 169-75, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25492948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Afghan population suffers from a long standing armed conflict. We investigated patients' experiences of their access to and use of the health services. METHODS: Data were collected in four clinics from different provinces. Mixed methods were applied. The questions focused on access obstacles during the current health problem and health seeking behaviour during a previous illness episode of a household member. RESULTS: To access the health facilities 71.8% (545/759) of patients experienced obstacles. The combination of long distances, high costs and the conflict deprived people of life-saving healthcare. The closest public clinics were underused due to perceptions regarding their lack of availability or quality of staff, services or medicines. For one in five people, a lack of access to health care had resulted in death among family members or close friends within the last year. CONCLUSIONS: Violence continues to affect daily life and access to healthcare in Afghanistan. Moreover, healthcare provision is not adequately geared to meet medical and emergency needs. Impartial healthcare tailored to the context will be vital to increase access to basic and life-saving healthcare.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Armed Conflicts , Costs and Cost Analysis , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Violence , Adolescent , Adult , Afghanistan , Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Female , Health Personnel/standards , Health Services/standards , Humans , Male , Young Adult
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 19(2): 202-9, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23343504

ABSTRACT

Despite high reported coverage for routine and supplementary immunization, in 2010 in Malawi, a large measles outbreak occurred that comprised 134,000 cases and 304 deaths. Although the highest attack rates were for young children (2.3%, 7.6%, and 4.5% for children <6, 6-8, and 9-11 months, respectively), persons >15 years of age were highly affected (1.0% and 0.4% for persons 15-19 and >19 years, respectively; 28% of all cases). A survey in 8 districts showed routine coverage of 95.0% for children 12-23 months; 57.9% for children 9-11 months; and 60.7% for children covered during the last supplementary immunization activities in 2008. Vaccine effectiveness was 83.9% for 1 dose and 90.5% for 2 doses. A continuous accumulation of susceptible persons during the past decade probably accounts for this outbreak. Countries en route to measles elimination, such as Malawi, should improve outbreak preparedness. Timeliness and the population chosen are crucial elements for reactive campaigns.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Measles/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Humans , Immunity , Incidence , Infant , Malawi/epidemiology , Male , Mass Vaccination , Measles/immunology , Measles/mortality , Measles Vaccine , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...