Proof-of-concept trial of an amniotic fluid-derived extracellular vesicle biologic for treating high risk patients with mild-to-moderate acute COVID-19 infection.

A pandemic brought on by COVID-19 has created a scalable health crisis. The search to help alleviate COVID-19-related complications through therapeutics has become a necessity. Zofin is an investigational, acellular biologic derived from full-term perinatal amniotic fluid that contains extracellular vesicles. Extracellular nanoparticles as such have been studied for their immunomodulatory benefits via cellular therapeutics and, if applied to COVID-19-related inflammation, could benefit patient outcome. Subjects (n = 8) experiencing mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms were treated with the experimental intervention. Complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, inflammatory biomarkers, and absolute lymphocyte counts were recorded prior to and on days 4, 8, 14, 21, and 30 as markers of disease progression. Additionally, chest x-rays were taken of the patients prior to and on days 8 and 30. Patients experienced no serious adverse events. All COVID-19-associated symptoms resolved or became stable with no indication of disease worsening as found by patient and chest x-ray reports. Inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-6, TNF- α ) and absolute lymphocyte counts improved throughout the study period. Findings from a proof-of-concept, expanded access trial for COVID-19 patients prove the acellular biologic is safe and potentially effective to prevent disease progression in a high-risk COVID-19 population with mild-to-moderate symptoms.

Association between biologic therapies for chronic plaque psoriasis and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

CONTEXT: Ustekinumab and briakinumab, monoclonal antibodies to the shared p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, have shown efficacy in treating chronic plaque psoriasis (CPP). Preliminary reports of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in psoriasis patients receiving anti-IL-12/23 agents have prompted concern. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a possible association between biologic therapies for CPP and MACEs via meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-IL-12/23 (ustekinumab and briakinumab) agents and anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) agents (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab) used in treating CPP were reviewed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Ovid MEDLINE from database inception to May 2011. The results of registered nonpublished completed studies were procured through abstract publications or poster presentations. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, monotherapy studies (with safety outcome data for MACE) of IL-12/23 antibodies and anti-TNF-α agents in adults. Studies of psoriatic arthritis were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently searched data while 6 investigators reviewed the abstracted data. RESULTS: A total of 22 RCTs comprising 10 183 patients met the predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measure was MACE, a composite end point of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or cardiovascular death during the placebo-controlled phase of treatment in patients receiving at least 1 dose of study agent or placebo. Absolute risk differences were used as an effect measure. There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity across the studies using the I(2) statistic (I(2) = 0), allowing for combination of trial results using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects method. During the placebo-controlled phases of the anti-IL-12/23 studies, 10 of 3179 patients receiving anti-IL-12/23 therapies experienced MACEs compared with zero events in 1474 patients receiving placebo (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 0.012 events/person-year; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.001 to 0.026; P =.12). In the anti-TNF-α trials, only 1 of 3858 patients receiving anti-TNF-α agents experienced a MACE compared with 1 of 1812 patients receiving placebo (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, -0.0005 events/person-year; 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.009; P = .94). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in the rate of MACEs observed in patients receiving anti-IL-12/IL-23 antibodies or anti-TNF-α treatments. This study may have been underpowered to identify a significant difference.